LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.6531+4C>T
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.?
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133202699 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr12:132626113 G>A
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
VUS
BP6 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
1.761828475930277e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_006231.4:c.6531+4C>T is an intronic variant at position +4 of intron 46 in POLE. SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta score 0.13).
2
This variant is present in gnomAD at extremely low frequency (v2.1: 8/245,768 alleles, AF=3.26e-05; v4.1: 28/1,589,258 alleles, AF=1.76e-05). The frequency does not reach BA1 (>1%) or BS1 (>0.3%) thresholds.
3
Invitae (Labcorp Genetics) reports this variant as Likely benign with criteria provided in ClinVar (SCV000772749). Ambry Genetics reports it as Uncertain significance (SCV000671346). Both are single-submitter clinical testing classifications without expert panel review.
4
The only criterion met is BP6 (Supporting benign) based on the Invitae ClinVar submission reporting Likely benign. No pathogenic criteria are met. Under ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules, a single Supporting benign criterion is insufficient for a Likely benign classification (requires ≥2 Supporting benign or 1 Strong benign + 1 Supporting benign). The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Under the custom POLE framework (León-Castillo et al. 2020, mirroring ACMG/AMP 2015), Likely Benign requires ≥2 Supporting benign criteria or 1 Strong benign + 1 Supporting benign; a single Supporting benign criterion defaults to VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | Intronic variant at c.6531+4 (intron 46), outside the canonical ±1,2 splice consensus. SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta score 0.13). Does not meet ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant criteria (PMC6185798). |
spliceai
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | Intronic variant with no amino acid change; PS1 requires a different nucleotide change at the same codon producing the same missense as an established pathogenic variant. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | N/A | Intronic variant with no predicted protein change (NP_006222.2:p.?); SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact. No functional studies are relevant for a variant with no predicted molecular consequence. |
spliceai
|
| PS4 | Not met | Two single-submitter ClinVar entries (Likely benign from Invitae, Uncertain significance from Ambry) do not constitute significantly increased prevalence in affected individuals. The custom POLE PS4 rule (León-Castillo et al. 2020) applies only to recurrent exonuclease-domain missense variants; this intronic variant does not qualify. No published case-control data are available. |
clinvar
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No validated de novo data available for this variant. |
|
| PM1 | N/A | The custom POLE PM1 rules (León-Castillo et al. 2020) apply only to exonuclease-domain missense variants. This intronic variant at c.6531+4 is not located in the exonuclease domain (residues 268–471) and is not a missense change. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PM2 | Not met | Variant is present in gnomAD at extremely low frequency (v2.1: 8/245,768 alleles, AF=3.26e-05; v4.1: 28/1,589,258 alleles, AF=1.76e-05) and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact. The presence in population databases, combined with absence of predicted functional consequence, does not support PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
spliceai
|
| PM5 | N/A | Intronic variant with no amino acid change; PM5 requires a different missense change at the same residue as a known pathogenic missense variant. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | Intronic variant, not a missense change. PP2 is specific to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta 0.13). REVEL and BayesDel scores are not available for this intronic variant. The custom POLE PP3 rule (León-Castillo et al. 2020) applies only to missense variants in Supplementary Tables S2/S3; this variant is not present in those tables. No computational tools predict a deleterious effect. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data are available to assess whether the phenotype is highly specific for a POLE-related disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as Likely benign (Invitae, 1 submitter) and Uncertain significance (Ambry, 1 submitter). No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. The cited PMID 25394175 (Hampel et al. 2015) is a general guideline for cancer predisposition referral and does not mention this variant. |
clinvar
PMID:25394175
|
| BA1 | Not met | gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency = 3.26e-05 (0.003%) and gnomAD v4.1 = 1.76e-05 (0.002%), both well below the 1% BA1 threshold for a dominant disorder. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant frequency (gnomAD v2.1 AF=3.26e-05, 0.003%; v4.1 AF=1.76e-05, 0.002%) is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. The frequency is not greater than expected for a POLE-related disorder. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data on observation of this variant in healthy adult individuals for a disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies are available for this variant. SpliceAI prediction alone does not constitute a functional study. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available to evaluate lack of segregation in affected family members. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | Intronic variant, not a missense change. BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta 0.13), but this constitutes only a single line of computational evidence. REVEL and BayesDel scores are not available for this intronic variant. The custom POLE BP4 rule applies only to missense variants in Supplementary Tables S2/S3; this variant is not present in those tables. Multiple lines of computational evidence are not available to meet BP4. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on observation of this variant in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Met | Invitae (Labcorp Genetics), a reputable clinical testing laboratory, reports this variant as Likely benign with criteria provided in ClinVar (SCV000772749, review status: criteria provided, single submitter). Under generic ACMG/AMP, a reputable source reporting the variant as benign supports BP6 at the Supporting level. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is specific to synonymous (silent) exonic variants for which splicing algorithms predict no impact and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. This variant is an intronic substitution at c.6531+4, not a synonymous coding variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Variant is a substitution, not an in-frame deletion or insertion. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | POLE is not associated with a recessive disorder; PM3 requires recessive disease context. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Variant is a substitution, not a protein-length altering change (in-frame deletion/insertion, stop-loss, or initiation codon). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.