LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004456.4:c.1966G>A
EZH2
· NP_004447.2:p.(Ala656Thr)
· NM_004456.4
GRCh37: chr7:148507488 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr7:148810396 C>T
Gene:
EZH2
Transcript:
NM_004456.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
EZH2
Transcript
NM_004456.4
Protein
NP_004447.2:p.(Ala656Thr)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_004456.4:c.1966G>A (p.Ala656Thr) is a missense variant in EZH2 that is absent from all population databases including gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada (PM2_Supporting).
2
No additional pathogenic or benign criteria are met. The variant has not been reported in ClinVar, has no functional studies, no segregation data, no de novo observations, and in silico predictors are discordant (REVEL 0.753 damaging; BayesDel 0.311 benign).
3
With a single supporting criterion (PM2) and no conflicting benign evidence, the variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines (PMID:25741868).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (p.Ala656Thr) and does not fall into any PVS1 null-variant category (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The generic PVS1 decision framework (PMC6185798) confirms this variant is not eligible for PVS1. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No prior report of a different nucleotide change at codon 656 resulting in the same p.Ala656Thr missense alteration with a pathogenic classification. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No publications identified through the literature pipeline. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect have been reported for this variant. OncoKB lists the variant as Unknown Oncogenic Effect and no PMIDs with functional data were identified. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control studies or statistical evidence of enrichment in affected individuals versus controls. The variant is absent from ClinVar, so no disease association data exist. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variants have been reported at codon 656 (Ala656) in ClinVar. No comparators exist to satisfy the PS5 requirement of a different pathogenic missense at the same residue. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot as assessed by Cancer Hotspots. No domain-specific enrichment data are available. Codon 656 is in the C-terminal region of EZH2 but has not been established as a critical functional domain for germline disease. |
|
| PM2 | Met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, with an allele frequency of 0. This meets the PM2 threshold for absence from population databases (allele frequency <0.1% for non-VCEP). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No pathogenic missense variants have been identified at the same residue (Ala656) to enable PM5 comparison. Automated ClinVar candidate harvesting for codon 656 returned zero candidates. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No publications describing de novo occurrence were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data are available for this variant. No family studies have been reported. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior score is unavailable for EZH2 (gene not supported by the HCI prior database). Without quantitative data on the gene's benign missense variation rate, PP2 cannot be reliably assessed. Note that EZH2 Weaver syndrome is primarily driven by missense variants (dominant-negative mechanism), but the rate of benign missense variation cannot be determined without HCI prior. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Insufficient consensus among multiple in silico predictors. REVEL score of 0.753 is above the pathogenicity threshold (≥0.5), but BayesDel score of 0.311 is below the damaging threshold (<0.5), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score 0.02). PP3 requires multiple lines of computational support, which are not met here. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No clinical phenotype or family history data are available to assess whether the patient's presentation is highly specific for EZH2-associated Weaver syndrome. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar with zero submissions. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD (allele frequency = 0). Does not meet the BA1 threshold of >1% population frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD (allele frequency = 0). Does not meet the BS1 threshold of >0.3% for rare disease (non-VCEP cutoff). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | The variant has not been observed in any healthy adult individuals in population databases. No evidence of occurrence with full penetrance expected but absent disease. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect have been reported for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data are available to assess lack of segregation with disease in affected families. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | EZH2 Weaver syndrome is primarily caused by missense variants through a dominant-negative mechanism, not by truncating mutations. The literature (PMID:40846643) explicitly notes the lack of early truncating mutations in EZH2 and supports a dominant-negative mechanism for missense variants. BP1 requires that the gene's primary disease mechanism is truncating, which does not apply to EZH2. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic dominant variant in EZH2. No data available. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Insufficient consensus among multiple in silico predictors for a benign effect. REVEL score of 0.753 indicates a damaging prediction, contradicting the requirement for multiple lines of benign computational evidence. Only BayesDel (0.311) supports a benign interpretation, and SpliceAI (max delta 0.02) is neutral. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No case has been reported in which this variant is found in an individual with an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (p.Ala656Thr), not a synonymous or intronic variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.02), but the criterion is fundamentally inapplicable to missense variants. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.