LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C
EZH2
· NP_004447.2:p.?
· NM_004456.4
GRCh37: chr7:148508821 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr7:148811729 T>G
Gene:
EZH2
Transcript:
NM_004456.4
Final call
Likely Benign
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
BP6 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
EZH2
Transcript
NM_004456.4
Protein
NP_004447.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
4.539072710970504e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C is an intronic variant in EZH2 located 9 bases upstream of exon 15, outside canonical splice consensus sites.
2
This variant is present in gnomAD at very low frequency (v2.1: 11/246,568 alleles, AF=0.0045%; v4.1: 73/1,608,258 alleles, AF=0.0045%) with no homozygotes observed. The allele frequency falls well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold (PM2_supporting).
3
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score = 0.02), providing computational evidence that the variant does not disrupt normal splicing (BP4_supporting).
4
ClinVar classifies this variant as Likely benign (VariationID 416828) based on a submission from Labcorp Genetics with ACMG criteria provided. This constitutes supporting benign evidence from a reputable clinical source (BP6_supporting).
5
PVS1 is not applicable as the variant lies outside canonical splice ±1,2 consensus sites and does not fall into null-variant buckets per ClinGen SVI recommendations (PMC6185798). PM5, PP2, BP1, BP7 are not applicable as the variant is intronic, not missense or synonymous. BP3, PM3, PM4 were skipped per instruction as trivially not applicable.
6
Applying generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final classification combination rules: two supporting benign criteria (BP4, BP6) are met, which reaches the threshold for Likely benign. One supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) is also met but does not alter the Likely benign classification under the standard combination rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Intronic variant (c.1852-9A>C) located outside canonical splice donor/acceptor ±1,2 consensus sites. Does not fall into PVS1 null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice) per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | Intronic variant produces no amino acid change; cannot compare to a pathogenic missense change at the same residue. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo observation for NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C was identified in the reviewed literature or ClinVar submissions. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies evaluating the impact of this intronic variant on splicing or protein function were identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | The variant has been observed in ClinVar as Likely benign (single submitter) and is present in gnomAD at low frequency (AF ~0.0045%). No case series or cohort study demonstrating enrichment in affected individuals was identified. Neither reviewed paper provides variant-specific case observations. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has recently reported this variant as pathogenic with unavailable supporting evidence. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant is not located in a well-established mutational hotspot or critical functional domain. Hotspot assessment found no significant residue-level clustering and the exact variant is not listed in known hotspot catalogs. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present in gnomAD at very low frequency (v2.1: AF=4.46e-05, 11/246,568 alleles; v4.1: AF=4.54e-05, 73/1,608,258 alleles; grpmax FAF=5.41e-05). The allele frequency is well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 in non-VCEP adjudication. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | Intronic variant; no missense residue to compare. pm5_candidates.json confirms no classic same-residue PM5 semantics applicable. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observation (with or without maternity/paternity confirmation) for NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C was identified in the reviewed literature. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation. NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C is an intronic variant, not a missense change. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score = 0.02). No other computational evidence (REVEL, BayesDel unavailable for intronic variant) supports a deleterious effect. Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support pathogenicity. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No detailed patient phenotype or family history data are available to assess specificity for EZH2-related Weaver syndrome. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar classification for this variant is Likely benign (single submitter, Labcorp Genetics). No reputable source reports this variant as pathogenic. The GeneReviews article on EZH2-Related Overgrowth (PMID:23865096) does not mention this specific variant in available sources. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency (0.0045%) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency (0.0045%) is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No documented observation of this variant in a healthy adult individual with full penetrance expected at an early age is available beyond population database frequencies. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect of this variant on splicing or protein function. SpliceAI in silico prediction is addressed under BP4 and does not alone constitute BS3-level evidence. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available to assess lack of segregation with disease in affected families. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where truncating variants are a known mechanism of disease. NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C is an intronic variant, not a missense change. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic dominant EZH2 variant is available. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Skipped per instruction: trivially not_applicable. BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions; this is a single-nucleotide intronic substitution. |
|
| BP4 | Met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this intronic variant (max delta score = 0.02), providing computational evidence that the variant does not disrupt normal splicing. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No observation of this variant in an individual with an alternate molecular basis for Weaver syndrome or EZH2-related overgrowth is available. |
|
| BP6 | Met | This variant has been classified as Likely benign by Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), a reputable clinical diagnostic laboratory, with ACMG criteria provided (ClinVar VariationID: 416828, SCV000562813). |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) coding variants with no predicted splice impact. NM_004456.4:c.1852-9A>C is an intronic variant, not a synonymous coding change. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.