LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004448.3:c.256A>G
ERBB2
· NP_004439.2:p.(Ile86Val)
· NM_004448.3
GRCh37: chr17:37864604 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr17:39708351 A>G
Gene:
ERBB2
Transcript:
NM_004448.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ERBB2
Transcript
NM_004448.3
Protein
NP_004439.2:p.(Ile86Val)
gnomAD AF
3.531519743054058e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_004448.3:c.256A>G (p.Ile86Val) in ERBB2 is absent from ClinVar and is present at very low frequency in population databases (gnomAD v2.1 AF=0.0068%, v4.1 AF=0.0035%), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
Multiple in silico predictors do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL score is 0.249, BayesDel score is -0.268, and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.01), meeting BP4 at supporting strength.
3
No variant-specific functional studies (PS3/BS3), de novo observations (PS2/PM6), co-segregation data (PP1/BS4), case-control data (PS4), or clinical phenotype data (PP4) were identified. The variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot (PM1 not met).
4
With one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), the evidence for pathogenicity and benign impact are balanced. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_004448.3:c.256A>G is a missense variant (p.Ile86Val) and does not fall into any default PVS1 null-variant bucket (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The generic PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) does not apply to missense variants. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No alternative nucleotide change at c.256 resulting in the same p.Ile86Val amino acid change has been identified in ClinVar or the literature. Insufficient data to assess PS1. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. No family studies or trio sequencing data were identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific functional studies were identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence. No publications with functional data for NM_004448.3:c.256A>G were found. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control studies comparing variant prevalence in affected versus unaffected individuals were identified. The variant is absent from ClinVar, providing no case-level observational data. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | PS5 is assessed only when PM5 criteria are met and the comparator variant is classified as pathogenic. No same-residue comparator variants were identified; PM5 is not applicable, precluding PS5 assessment. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 86 lies in the extracellular domain of ERBB2, not in a statistically significant mutational hotspot. The hotspots analysis confirmed this variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. No evidence that p.Ile86 is a critical functional domain residue. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases. In gnomAD v2.1, the allele frequency is 0.00676% (17/251,362 alleles, 0 homozygotes) with a grpmax filtering allele frequency of 0.0302%. In gnomAD v4.1, the allele frequency is 0.00353% (57/1,614,036 alleles) with a grpmax FAF of 0.0437%. Both are well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 supporting. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | Unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics — no same-residue comparator variants (different amino acid change at p.Ile86) identified in ClinVar or literature. PM5 candidate harvesting returned zero candidates. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available. No publications reporting de novo occurrence of NM_004448.3:c.256A>G with confirmed maternity/paternity were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No co-segregation data available. No family studies demonstrating segregation of NM_004448.3:c.256A>G with disease were identified. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | While ERBB2 has a loss-of-function disease mechanism supported by germline literature, specific gene-level constraint metrics (e.g., missense Z-score) were not retrieved for this case. ERBB2 is a well-characterized oncogene in which activating missense variants are a known somatic mechanism, complicating the straightforward application of PP2 in a germline context without dedicated constraint data. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico tools do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.249 (below the 0.5 threshold for pathogenic prediction). BayesDel score is -0.268 (below 0.0, consistent with a benign prediction). SpliceAI max delta score is 0.01 (no predicted splicing impact). The consensus of in silico predictors does not support pathogenicity. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or clinical data specific to this variant were available for review. The variant is absent from ClinVar, providing no phenotype-level case data. |
clinvar
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source (clinical laboratory, expert panel, or published report) has classified this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant does not meet the BA1 allele frequency threshold (>1%). In gnomAD v2.1, the overall AF is 0.00676% and in gnomAD v4.1, the overall AF is 0.00353%. The highest subpopulation frequency is 0.056% in gnomAD v4.1 South Asian. All frequencies are well below 1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant does not meet the BS1 allele frequency threshold (>0.3%). In gnomAD v2.1, the overall AF is 0.00676% with grpmax FAF of 0.0302%. In gnomAD v4.1, the overall AF is 0.00353% with grpmax FAF of 0.0437%. All frequencies are well below 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | One homozygous individual is observed in gnomAD v4.1 (South Asian population, 1 homozygote out of 91,080 alleles). However, BS2 requires confirmed observation in a healthy adult individual. gnomAD is a population database that does not provide individual-level phenotype confirmation. The homozygous observation is noted but does not independently satisfy BS2 without clinical confirmation of unaffected status. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect on protein function or splicing were identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no variant-specific functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available. No family studies demonstrating lack of segregation of NM_004448.3:c.256A>G with disease in affected family members were identified. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | BP1 applies to genes where primarily truncating variants cause disease. ERBB2 is a well-established oncogene in which missense activating variants (particularly in the kinase domain) are a well-recognized pathogenic mechanism. Missense variants are a known mechanism of disease in ERBB2; the gene is not limited to a truncation-only disease mechanism. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data available regarding observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic variant. No phase information or family studies are available. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple in silico tools predict no significant impact. REVEL score is 0.249 (below 0.5, not consistent with pathogenicity). BayesDel score is -0.268 (below 0.0, consistent with a benign prediction). SpliceAI max delta score is 0.01 (no predicted splicing alteration). The consensus of computational predictors supports a benign interpretation. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No case reports identifying an alternate molecular basis for disease in an individual harboring this variant were identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source has classified this variant as benign or likely benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_004448.3:c.256A>G is a missense variant (p.Ile86Val), not a synonymous or intronic variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous/non-coding variants for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This is a single-nucleotide substitution, not an in-frame deletion or insertion. BP3 applies only to in-frame indels in repeat regions without a known function. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders requiring biallelic observations. The current germline disease context for ERBB2 does not indicate a clearly established biallelic/recessive inheritance pattern; dominant or de novo models are more consistent with available literature. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a single-nucleotide missense variant. PM4 applies to protein length-altering variants (in-frame deletions/insertions, stop-loss). No protein length change results from this substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.