LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004448.3:c.2506C>A
ERBB2
· NP_004439.2:p.(Leu836Met)
· NM_004448.3
GRCh37: chr17:37881314 C>A
·
GRCh38: chr17:39725061 C>A
Gene:
ERBB2
Transcript:
NM_004448.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ERBB2
Transcript
NM_004448.3
Protein
NP_004439.2:p.(Leu836Met)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_004448.3:c.2506C>A (p.Leu836Met) is a missense variant in exon 21 of ERBB2.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada population databases (PM2_Supporting).
3
The variant is absent from ClinVar with no submissions or classifications reported.
4
In silico predictions are conflicting: REVEL (0.74) supports a deleterious effect, while BayesDel (0.21) does not and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). Neither PP3 nor BP4 is met.
5
OncoKB reports no variant-specific functional evidence (Unknown Oncogenic Effect) and no publications were identified that mention this variant.
6
No CSPEC/VCEP framework exists for ERBB2; generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria were applied per Richards et al. (PMID:25741868). With only one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and no benign criteria met, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_004448.3:c.2506C>A is a missense variant (p.Leu836Met) and does not fall into the default PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 requires a different nucleotide change at the same codon resulting in the same predicted amino acid change that is already established as pathogenic. This variant is absent from ClinVar and no pathogenic comparators at codon 836 were identified. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data are available for this variant. No publications or case-level data report de novo inheritance. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies were identified. OncoKB classifies this variant as 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no reviewed functional evidence. No publications or curated sources provide functional data for this variant. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or prevalence data are available to demonstrate enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls. The variant is absent from all queried population and clinical databases. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No other missense variant at codon 836 has been established as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no literature reports a pathogenic comparator at this residue. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PM1 | Not met | The p.Leu836Met substitution lies within the ERBB2 kinase domain, but residue 836 has not been identified as a statistically significant mutational hotspot (cancerhotspots.org) and no VCEP-approved critical domain specification exists for germline ERBB2 interpretation. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, consistent with a rare variant (allele frequency <0.1%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variant at codon 836 has been identified as a comparator. Automated PM5 candidate harvesting found zero same-residue candidates in ClinVar. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo occurrence has been reported for this variant. No publications or database submissions document a de novo observation. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data are available. No family studies have been reported for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI gene-level prior is not available for ERBB2, precluding assessment of missense constraint (z-score) and the proportion of benign missense variation in this gene. PP2 cannot be applied without these metrics. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence is conflicting: REVEL score (0.74) supports a deleterious effect, but BayesDel (0.209718) is below the typical pathogenic threshold and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00). Under ACMG/AMP 2015, multiple concordant lines of computational evidence are required, which is not satisfied here. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data are available to assess phenotypic specificity for an ERBB2-related disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant. The variant is absent from ClinVar with zero submissions, and no expert panel or clinical laboratory has rendered a classification. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada. Allele frequency does not exceed the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from population databases. Allele frequency does not exceed the 0.3% BS1 threshold for a rare disease. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in healthy adult controls has been documented. The variant is absent from all population databases. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No functional studies demonstrating a neutral or benign effect have been identified for this variant. OncoKB reports no variant-specific functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data are available to assess lack of co-segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | ERBB2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase in which both truncating and missense variants are implicated in disease. The germline disease spectrum is not established as exclusively truncation-mediated, and ERBB2 is well-known for activating missense mutations in somatic cancer. BP1 cannot be applied without evidence that only truncating variants cause the relevant germline disorder. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observations of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic variant have been reported. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence is conflicting and does not provide multiple concordant lines supporting a benign effect. While SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00) and BayesDel (0.21) leans benign, REVEL (0.74) supports a deleterious effect, precluding a BP4 determination. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No case has been identified in which this variant is found alongside an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar, and no expert panel or clinical laboratory has rendered a benign classification. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_004448.3:c.2506C>A (p.Leu836Met) is a missense variant, not synonymous or intronic; BP7 applies only to silent variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.