LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002878.3:c.641C>T
RAD51D
· NP_002869.3:p.(Pro214Leu)
· NM_002878.3
GRCh37: chr17:33430499 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr17:35103480 G>A
Gene:
RAD51D
Transcript:
NM_002878.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
RAD51D
Transcript
NM_002878.3
Protein
NP_002869.3:p.(Pro214Leu)
gnomAD AF
1.2390928848808365e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and present at extremely low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (AF=0.000124%, 2/1,614,084 alleles, 0 homozygotes), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
Multiple in silico tools predict no damaging effect: REVEL score 0.266, BayesDel score 0.181, and SpliceAI max delta 0.00, meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
3
The variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance by five clinical laboratories (Variation ID: 574602). No expert panel review or pathogenic/benign classification has been rendered.
4
No variant-specific functional studies, cosegregation data, de novo observations, or case-control enrichment data are available. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no curated functional evidence.
5
The opposing PM2 (supporting) and BP4 (supporting benign) criteria effectively cancel each other, yielding an evidence framework consistent with Uncertain significance.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.641C>T, p.Pro214Leu), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The ClinGen SVI PVS1 decision tree does not apply to missense substitutions. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No data available to determine whether a different nucleotide change at the same amino acid residue (Pro214) has been established as pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo observation with confirmed maternity and paternity is available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies were identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no curated functional evidence for this variant. No publication with functional experimental data for NM_002878.3:c.641C>T was found. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or cohort data comparing variant prevalence in affected individuals versus controls is available. The ClinVar submissions do not include case counts or odds ratios. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. ClinVar classification is Uncertain significance from all 5 clinical laboratories; no expert panel review has been performed. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per CancerHotspots.org, and no domain-level constraint or functional domain data specific to RAD51D missense constraint is available to support PM1 application. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and present at an extremely low allele frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (AF=0.000124%, 2/1,614,084 alleles, 0 homozygotes). Well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold for dominant disorders. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No established pathogenic missense variant at the same residue (Pro214) with a different amino acid change is available. PM5 candidate harvesting returned no comparators. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observation (maternity/paternity unconfirmed) has been reported for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data with disease in families is available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No HCI prior or other gene-level constraint metric is available for RAD51D (gene_not_supported in HCI prior lookup). Cannot assess whether RAD51D has a low rate of benign missense variation. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico tools do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.266 (below the 0.5 damaging threshold). BayesDel score is 0.181 (below common 0.2–0.3 damaging thresholds). SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no splice impact). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No detailed clinical phenotype or family history data are available for the probands carrying this variant. ClinVar submissions lack specific phenotype descriptions. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. All five ClinVar submitters classify it as Uncertain significance. No expert panel classification exists. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The maximum allele frequency (gnomAD v4.1 NFE: 0.00017%) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The maximum allele frequency (gnomAD v4.1 NFE: 0.00017%) is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in healthy adult controls for a fully penetrant early-onset disorder. The 2 gnomAD alleles lack phenotype data to confirm healthy status or exclude late-onset disease. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect on protein function or splicing are available. OncoKB reports no variant-specific functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data demonstrating absence of cosegregation with disease is available. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | RAD51D loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but missense variants can also be pathogenic via dominant-negative or hypomorphic effects. Without gene-specific data on the proportion of pathogenic variants that are truncating versus missense, BP1 cannot be reliably applied. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in trans with a known pathogenic variant in RAD51D. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel in a non-repeat region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene product. REVEL score is 0.266 (below the 0.5 damaging threshold), BayesDel score is 0.181 (below common 0.2–0.3 damaging thresholds), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice impact). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on observation of this variant in cases with an alternative molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as benign. ClinVar classification is Uncertain significance; no benign classification exists from any clinical laboratory. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.641C>T, p.Pro214Leu), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.