LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_003925.3:c.89C>T
MBD4
· NP_003916.1:p.(Pro30Leu)
· NM_003925.3
GRCh37: chr3:129158588 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr3:129439745 G>A
Gene:
MBD4
Transcript:
NM_003925.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
MBD4
Transcript
NM_003925.3
Protein
NP_003916.1:p.(Pro30Leu)
gnomAD AF
6.276344957961042e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_003925.3:c.89C>T (p.Pro30Leu) in MBD4 is a missense variant with no ClinVar classification and no variant-specific functional data.
2
The variant is extremely rare in population databases (gnomAD v4.1: 1/1,593,284 alleles, AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷), satisfying PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple concordant computational predictors (REVEL 0.016, BayesDel −0.65999, SpliceAI 0.00) predict a benign effect, satisfying BP4 at supporting_benign strength.
4
PM2 (supporting pathogenic) and BP4 (supporting benign) represent equal-weight opposing evidence; under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules (PMID:25741868), this results in a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
5
No variant-specific publications, functional studies, de novo reports, segregation data, or external classifications were identified to further inform interpretation.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_003925.3:c.89C>T is a missense variant (p.Pro30Leu), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice site). The PVS1 variant assessment confirms no eligibility under the ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence of a different nucleotide change at codon 30 resulting in the same amino acid change (Pro30Leu) classified as pathogenic in ClinVar or the literature. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo reports with confirmed paternity and maternity identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies identified for this variant. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected individuals to controls available for this variant. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No alternative reputable source (ClinVar, VCEP, or clinical laboratory) has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant (p.Pro30Leu) is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot. Cancer Hotspots analysis found no significant hotspot at residue Pro30. The residue is in the N-terminal region of MBD4, upstream of the methyl-CpG binding domain (residues ~82-147), and there is no evidence it lies within a critical, well-established functional domain. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases. gnomAD v4.1 reports a single heterozygous allele among 1,593,284 total alleles (allele frequency = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷, or 0.000063%), which is well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No pathogenic missense variants identified at the same amino acid residue (Pro30) for comparison. PM5 candidate harvesting found no eligible comparators. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo reports without confirmation of paternity and maternity identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No co-segregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Insufficient data to assess whether MBD4 has a low rate of benign missense variation. No gene-level missense constraint metrics (Z-score, gnomAD missense o/e) are available in the evidence packet. HCI prior is not available for MBD4. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence support a benign effect. REVEL score is 0.016 (well below the 0.5 threshold, predicting benign), BayesDel score is −0.65999 (negative, consistent with benign), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice impact). All available in silico predictors agree on a benign interpretation. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history data specific to this case are available for review. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Allele frequency is far below the 1% BA1 threshold (non-VCEP). gnomAD v4.1 reports a single allele (AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷). |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Allele frequency is far below the 0.3% BS1 threshold (non-VCEP). gnomAD v4.1 reports a single allele (AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷). |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data available regarding observation of this variant in healthy adults for a disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Although truncating MBD4 variants have been reported as pathogenic (e.g., c.217C>T/p.Gln73* in PMID:31322271), there is insufficient evidence that missense variants in MBD4 are not a disease mechanism. The gene-level evidence suggests a multi-tumor predisposition syndrome with LoF as a mechanism, but missense variants have not been systematically excluded. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant (recessive disorders) or in cis with a pathogenic variant (any inheritance). |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no impact on the gene product. REVEL score is 0.016 (strongly benign-predicting), BayesDel score is −0.65999 (negative, consistent with benign), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice alteration). All three independent in silico tools concordantly predict a benign effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_003925.3:c.89C>T is a missense variant (p.Pro30Leu), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions; this is a single nucleotide substitution. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders; MBD4-associated disease (multi-tumor predisposition) is not established as a recessive condition, and no recessive context exists for this variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions and stop-loss variants; this is a missense substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.