LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-06-23
Case ID: NM_003925.3_c.89C_T_20260623_174628
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_003925.3:c.89C>T

MBD4  · NP_003916.1:p.(Pro30Leu)  · NM_003925.3
GRCh37: chr3:129158588 G>A  ·  GRCh38: chr3:129439745 G>A
Gene: MBD4 Transcript: NM_003925.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting BP4 supporting benign
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
MBD4
Transcript
NM_003925.3
Protein
NP_003916.1:p.(Pro30Leu)
gnomAD AF
6.276344957961042e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_003925.3:c.89C>T (p.Pro30Leu) in MBD4 is a missense variant with no ClinVar classification and no variant-specific functional data.
2
The variant is extremely rare in population databases (gnomAD v4.1: 1/1,593,284 alleles, AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷), satisfying PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple concordant computational predictors (REVEL 0.016, BayesDel −0.65999, SpliceAI 0.00) predict a benign effect, satisfying BP4 at supporting_benign strength.
4
PM2 (supporting pathogenic) and BP4 (supporting benign) represent equal-weight opposing evidence; under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules (PMID:25741868), this results in a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
5
No variant-specific publications, functional studies, de novo reports, segregation data, or external classifications were identified to further inform interpretation.
Final determination: Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A NM_003925.3:c.89C>T is a missense variant (p.Pro30Leu), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice site). The PVS1 variant assessment confirms no eligibility under the ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework (PMC6185798).
pvs1_generic_framework pvs1_variant_assessment
PS1 Not assessed No evidence of a different nucleotide change at codon 30 resulting in the same amino acid change (Pro30Leu) classified as pathogenic in ClinVar or the literature.
PS2 Not assessed No de novo reports with confirmed paternity and maternity identified for this variant.
PS3 Not assessed No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies identified for this variant. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific functional evidence.
oncokb
PS4 Not assessed No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected individuals to controls available for this variant.
PS5 Not assessed No alternative reputable source (ClinVar, VCEP, or clinical laboratory) has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar.
clinvar
PM1 Not met This variant (p.Pro30Leu) is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot. Cancer Hotspots analysis found no significant hotspot at residue Pro30. The residue is in the N-terminal region of MBD4, upstream of the methyl-CpG binding domain (residues ~82-147), and there is no evidence it lies within a critical, well-established functional domain.
PM2 Met This variant is extremely rare in population databases. gnomAD v4.1 reports a single heterozygous allele among 1,593,284 total alleles (allele frequency = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷, or 0.000063%), which is well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada.
gnomad_v4 gnomad_v2 gnomad_canada
PM5 Not assessed No pathogenic missense variants identified at the same amino acid residue (Pro30) for comparison. PM5 candidate harvesting found no eligible comparators.
pm5_candidates
PM6 Not assessed No assumed de novo reports without confirmation of paternity and maternity identified for this variant.
PP1 Not assessed No co-segregation data available for this variant in affected families.
PP2 Not assessed Insufficient data to assess whether MBD4 has a low rate of benign missense variation. No gene-level missense constraint metrics (Z-score, gnomAD missense o/e) are available in the evidence packet. HCI prior is not available for MBD4.
PP3 Not met Multiple lines of computational evidence support a benign effect. REVEL score is 0.016 (well below the 0.5 threshold, predicting benign), BayesDel score is −0.65999 (negative, consistent with benign), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice impact). All available in silico predictors agree on a benign interpretation.
revel bayesdel spliceai
PP4 Not assessed No patient phenotype or family history data specific to this case are available for review.
PP5 Not assessed No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar.
clinvar
BA1 Not met Allele frequency is far below the 1% BA1 threshold (non-VCEP). gnomAD v4.1 reports a single allele (AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷).
gnomad_v4
BS1 Not met Allele frequency is far below the 0.3% BS1 threshold (non-VCEP). gnomAD v4.1 reports a single allele (AF = 6.28 × 10⁻⁷).
gnomad_v4
BS2 Not assessed No data available regarding observation of this variant in healthy adults for a disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age.
BS3 Not assessed No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect for this variant.
BS4 Not assessed No non-segregation data available for this variant in affected families.
BP1 Not assessed Although truncating MBD4 variants have been reported as pathogenic (e.g., c.217C>T/p.Gln73* in PMID:31322271), there is insufficient evidence that missense variants in MBD4 are not a disease mechanism. The gene-level evidence suggests a multi-tumor predisposition syndrome with LoF as a mechanism, but missense variants have not been systematically excluded.
BP2 Not assessed No data on observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant (recessive disorders) or in cis with a pathogenic variant (any inheritance).
BP4 Met Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no impact on the gene product. REVEL score is 0.016 (strongly benign-predicting), BayesDel score is −0.65999 (negative, consistent with benign), and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice alteration). All three independent in silico tools concordantly predict a benign effect.
revel bayesdel spliceai
BP5 Not assessed No data on an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant.
BP6 Not assessed No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar.
clinvar
BP7 N/A NM_003925.3:c.89C>T is a missense variant (p.Pro30Leu), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact.
BP3 N/A BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions; this is a single nucleotide substitution.
PM3 N/A PM3 applies to recessive disorders; MBD4-associated disease (multi-tumor predisposition) is not established as a recessive condition, and no recessive context exists for this variant.
PM4 N/A PM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions and stop-loss variants; this is a missense substitution.
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.