LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001274.5:c.157A>G
CHEK1
· NP_001265.2:p.(Lys53Glu)
· NM_001274.5
GRCh37: chr11:125497593 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr11:125627698 A>G
Gene:
CHEK1
Transcript:
NM_001274.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CHEK1
Transcript
NM_001274.5
Protein
NP_001265.2:p.(Lys53Glu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001274.5:c.157A>G (p.Lys53Glu) in CHEK1 is a missense variant absent from all gnomAD population databases (v2.1, v4.1, Canada), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant has been reported at the same amino acid residue (Lys53) in ClinVar; PS1 and PM5 are not applicable.
3
Multiple lines of in silico evidence do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL 0.271, BayesDel -0.154, SpliceAI max delta 0.00. PP3 is not met.
4
PVS1 is not applicable as this is a missense variant not falling into null-variant buckets defined by ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798).
5
No functional studies (PS3/BS3), segregation data (PP1/BS4), de novo observations (PS2/PM6), case-control data (PS4), phenotype data (PP4), or ClinVar classifications (PS5/PP5/BP6) are available for this variant.
6
With PM2_supporting as the sole met criterion, the variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under ACMG/AMP 2015 rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_001274.5:c.157A>G is a missense variant (p.Lys53Glu) and does not fall into the null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1,2 splice) required for generic PVS1 application under PMC6185798. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | No pathogenic variant with a different amino acid substitution at the same residue (Lys53) has been identified. PM5 candidate search returned zero same-residue comparator variants in ClinVar. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | N/A | No de novo observation data available. No ClinVar submissions, no literature reports, and no family studies documenting de novo occurrence of this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies evaluate the specific variant NM_001274.5:c.157A>G. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific curated functional evidence. No COSMIC data. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or cohort studies include this variant. Absent from ClinVar and COSMIC. The variant has not been reported in affected individuals relative to controls. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No ClinVar submissions exist for this variant. No alternative-source pathogenic classification is available for evaluation. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | Position 53 lies within the CHEK1 kinase domain (residues ~1-265), but no VCEP/CSPEC defines this residue as a mutational hotspot or critical functional domain position. Cancer Hotspots analysis found no statistically significant hotspot at this residue. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_001274.5:c.157A>G is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, with an allele frequency of 0 in all populations (<0.1% threshold). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue comparator variants with alternative pathogenic substitutions identified at Lys53. PM5 candidate search returned zero candidates. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | N/A | No de novo observation reported. No family data or trio testing results available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data available. No family studies or co-segregation analyses include this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior data not available for CHEK1. Cannot determine whether the gene has a low rate of benign missense variation. Without HCI prior or CSPEC specification, PP2 cannot be applied. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score 0.271 (<0.5 threshold), BayesDel score -0.154 (<0.27 threshold), and SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splice impact) all indicate a neutral or benign in silico profile. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype data available. The variant has not been identified in patients with CHEK1-related disease phenotypes in ClinVar or published literature. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. No ClinVar submissions exist, and no expert panel has evaluated this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Variant is absent from all gnomAD populations (AF=0). Does not meet the BA1 threshold of >1% allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Variant is absent from all gnomAD populations (AF=0). Does not meet the BS1 threshold of >0.3% allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No observations in healthy adult controls or homozygous state available. No individual-level data to evaluate BS2. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies have evaluated the specific effect of p.Lys53Glu on CHEK1 protein function. In silico predictors suggest neutral effect but do not constitute BS3-level functional evidence. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available to assess lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Although CHEK1 loss-of-function is a supported disease mechanism with truncating variants implicated (PMID:38686193), insufficient evidence exists to determine that primarily truncating variants cause CHEK1-related disease such that a missense change should be downgraded. No CSPEC/VCEP specification available. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information available. No observations in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence is mixed and does not meet the 'multiple lines suggesting no impact' threshold. REVEL 0.271 and SpliceAI 0.00 suggest no impact, but BayesDel -0.154 is intermediate and does not provide a clear benign prediction. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | N/A | No observations of this variant in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | No reputable source has reported this variant as benign. No ClinVar submissions or literature classifications exist. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants. NM_001274.5:c.157A>G is a missense variant (p.Lys53Glu), not synonymous. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.