LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_018062.3:c.524C>T
FANCL
· NP_060532.2:p.(Ala175Val)
· NM_018062.3
GRCh37: chr2:58425745 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr2:58198610 G>A
Gene:
FANCL
Transcript:
NM_018062.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
FANCL
Transcript
NM_018062.3
Protein
NP_060532.2:p.(Ala175Val)
gnomAD AF
2.2930293148304458e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
This variant is absent or extremely rare in large population cohorts: gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency 0.00389% (11/282,764 alleles) and v4.1 allele frequency 0.00229% (37/1,613,586 alleles), meeting PM2 at supporting level.
2
Multiple in silico predictors do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.089, BayesDel score -0.494, and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.04), meeting BP4 at supporting level.
3
The variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance by 4 clinical laboratories and Likely benign by 1 clinical laboratory (ClinVar Variation ID: 898372). No expert panel classification is available.
4
The variant is a missense substitution (p.Ala175Val) and does not qualify for PVS1. No functional studies, segregation data, case-control comparisons, or de novo observations were identified for this variant.
5
Applying generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final combination rules (PMID:25741868): PM2_supporting and BP4_supporting provide conflicting lines of evidence with no other criteria met. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (p.Ala175Val); it does not fall into a null-variant bucket (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). PVS1 is not applicable per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence of a different nucleotide change at codon 175 resulting in the same Ala175Val amino acid substitution that has been established as pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data with confirmed maternity and paternity available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect for NM_018062.3:c.524C>T were identified. No reviewed publication contained variant-specific functional data. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control data or sufficient patient observations to assess whether the variant prevalence differs significantly between affected individuals and controls. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No alternative pathogenic missense variant at codon 175 identified for comparison via ClinVar. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant is not located in a known mutational hotspot or well-established critical functional domain. Hotspot analysis confirmed residue 175 is not statistically significant. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency 0.00389% (11/282,764 alleles) and v4.1 allele frequency 0.00229% (37/1,613,586 alleles), both well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. No homozygotes observed. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue comparator missense variants at Ala175 with established pathogenicity were identified. PM5 candidate search returned no qualified comparators. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observations (with or without confirmed parentage) available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No co-segregation data available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Insufficient data to determine whether FANCL has a low rate of benign missense variation and a preponderance of pathogenic missense variants, which would be required for PP2 application. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico predictors do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.089 (well below the 0.5 threshold for pathogenicity), BayesDel score -0.494 (negative, favoring benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.04). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient-specific phenotype or family history data available for review. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. ClinVar classification is Uncertain significance (4 clinical laboratories) and Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory); no expert panel classification available. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency (gnomAD v2.1 European non-Finnish: 0.00697%) is far below the 1% threshold required for BA1. |
gnomad_v2
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency (0.00697%) is below the 0.3% threshold required for BS1. |
gnomad_v2
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygous observations in gnomAD (v2.1: 0 homozygotes; v4.1: 0 homozygotes). The variant has not been observed in a healthy adult homozygous state. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect for this specific variant were identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | While FANCL is a gene in which biallelic loss-of-function variants cause Fanconi anemia, insufficient data are available to determine that primarily truncating (rather than missense) variants are the established cause of disease, which is required to apply BP1 to this missense variant. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | FANCL is associated with disease through biallelic loss-of-function variants, not exclusively through missense changes. BP2 applies only to genes where disease is exclusively caused by missense variants. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no damaging effect: REVEL score 0.089 (benign), BayesDel score -0.494 (benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.04). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternative missense variant at codon 175 with a benign classification was identified in ClinVar. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | One ClinVar submitter (Ambry Genetics) classifies this variant as Likely benign, but four other clinical laboratories classify it as Uncertain significance. The single-submitter Likely benign classification does not meet the BP6 threshold for a reputable source with strong evidence of benign impact. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.524C>T, p.Ala175Val), not a silent/synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants without predicted splicing impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Substitution variant; BP3 applies to in-frame indels only. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | Pre-marked as skip; PM3 assessment deferred. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Substitution variant; PM4 applies to non-repeat in-frame deletions/insertions and stop-loss variants only. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.