LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A
EZHIP
· NP_981952.1:p.(Glu502Lys)
· NM_203407.3
GRCh37: chrX:51151372 G>A
·
GRCh38: chrX:51408520 G>A
Gene:
EZHIP
Transcript:
NM_203407.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
EZHIP
Transcript
NM_203407.3
Protein
NP_981952.1:p.(Glu502Lys)
gnomAD AF
5.80593401643959e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PM2 was met at supporting strength: NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A is present in gnomAD at very low overall frequency (v2.1 AF=0.00724%, v4.1 AF=0.00581%), below the 0.1% threshold.
2
BP4 was met at supporting benign strength: BayesDel score of -0.855 predicts a benign effect and SpliceAI max delta of 0.01 indicates no splicing impact.
3
With one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), the evidence is conflicting and neither the pathogenic nor benign thresholds are reached. This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per generic ACMG/AMP 2015 classification rules (PMID:25741868).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A is a missense variant (p.Glu502Lys). The generic PVS1 decision framework (PMC6185798) applies only to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, and canonical ±1,2 splice consensus changes); this variant falls into the 'other' bucket and is not eligible for PVS1. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No ClinVar or literature data are available to determine whether a different nucleotide change producing the same p.Glu502Lys amino acid substitution has been previously established as pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo observations with confirmed maternity and paternity were identified for this variant in the literature or ClinVar. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies for NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A (p.Glu502Lys) were identified. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific curated evidence. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or case series data comparing variant prevalence in affected versus unaffected individuals are available. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from ClinVar; no expert panel or reputable source classification is available. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie within a statistically significant mutational hotspot (Hotspots analysis: residue not significant, exact variant not listed). No evidence of a critical functional domain with established pathogenic missense clustering was identified. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A is present in gnomAD at very low overall frequency (v2.1: AF=0.00724%, 13/179,567 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.00581%, 33/568,384 alleles), below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. However, the variant has been observed in multiple alleles across gnomAD releases with one homozygous (or hemizygous on X) individual, and the East Asian subpopulation frequency is at the threshold borderline (v2.1 EAS AF=0.094%; v4.1 EAS AF=0.104%). PM2 is applied at supporting rather than moderate strength given the presence of multiple population alleles. This variant is absent from gnomAD-Canada. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | Automated PM5 candidate harvesting was unable to identify same-residue (Glu502) comparator pathogenic variants in ClinVar; PM5 semantics could not be confirmed. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observations (with or without confirmed maternity and paternity) were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No missense constraint metrics (e.g., gnomAD Z-score, o/e ratio) are available for EZHIP to determine whether the gene has a low rate of benign missense variation. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a deleterious effect. BayesDel score is -0.855, strongly predicting a benign effect. SpliceAI max delta is 0.01, indicating no splicing impact. REVEL and HCI prior are unavailable for this variant. |
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or clinical information was provided for this case. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic; it is absent from ClinVar and no expert panel review is available. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The overall gnomAD allele frequency (v2.1: 0.00724%; v4.1: 0.00581%) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold for a stand-alone benign classification. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest subpopulation allele frequency (gnomAD v4.1 EAS: 0.104%) is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. The grpmax filtering allele frequency (v2.1: 0.056%; v4.1: 0.076%) is also below 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Although the variant is observed in gnomAD, no clinical information is available to determine whether any carriers are healthy adults with a disorder for which full penetrance is expected at an early age. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect are available for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available to evaluate lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | While EZHIP loss-of-function is supported as a disease mechanism (PVS1 gene context: LOF eligible), there is insufficient evidence to conclude that truncating variants are the only pathogenic variant type to the exclusion of missense changes. BP1 cannot be applied without gene-specific data showing that missense variants are not disease-causing. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data are available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in a gene associated with a recessive disorder. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no damaging effect. BayesDel score of -0.855 strongly predicts a benign effect, and SpliceAI max delta of 0.01 indicates no splicing impact. These in silico predictions support a benign interpretation at the supporting level. |
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No case data are available identifying an alternate molecular cause for disease in an individual carrying this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable source classifies this variant as benign; it is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_203407.3:c.1504G>A is a missense variant (p.Glu502Lys), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants without predicted splicing impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Variant is a substitution, not an in-frame deletion or insertion; BP3 applies only to in-frame indels. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders; no recessive disease association has been established for EZHIP in the context of this assessment. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Variant is a missense substitution, not a protein-length-altering variant (stop-loss, start-loss, or in-frame indel); PM4 does not apply. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.