LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A
TET2
· NP_001120680.1:p.(Thr1884Asn)
· NM_001127208.2
GRCh37: chr4:106197318 C>A
·
GRCh38: chr4:105276161 C>A
Gene:
TET2
Transcript:
NM_001127208.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2
Protein
NP_001120680.1:p.(Thr1884Asn)
gnomAD AF
0.0 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A (p.Thr1884Asn) is a missense variant in TET2, a gene with emerging germline disease association involving autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like phenotypes and hematologic malignancy.
2
The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 (0/1,551,598 alleles) and gnomAD-Canada, meeting PM2 at moderate strength.
3
Multiple in silico tools predict a neutral or benign effect: BayesDel score is -0.27313 (benign), REVEL score is 0.302 (neutral), and SpliceAI delta is 0.00 (no splice impact), meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
4
The variant is absent from ClinVar and has not been classified by any expert panel. OncoKB reports an 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific functional evidence.
5
One somatic observation exists in COSMIC (COSV54403709, n=1), but this does not independently support germline pathogenicity.
6
No functional studies, family segregation data, de novo observations, or case-control data are available. Literature search returned zero variant-specific PMIDs.
7
With one moderate pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), this variant does not meet the threshold for Likely Pathogenic (requires ≥2 moderate or ≥1 moderate + ≥4 supporting) or Likely Benign (requires ≥1 strong benign + ≥1 supporting benign, or ≥2 supporting benign). The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A is a missense variant (p.Thr1884Asn) and does not fall into any null-variant bucket (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The generic PVS1 decision tree (PMC6185798) is not applicable to missense substitutions. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | No pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Thr1884Asn) has been established in ClinVar or the literature. The variant is absent from ClinVar entirely. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | N/A | No de novo testing data (with confirmed paternity and maternity) are available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies are available for NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A. Literature search returned zero PMIDs, and OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no variant-specific curated functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or prevalence data are available to assess whether this variant is statistically enriched in affected individuals. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified this missense variant as pathogenic, and no same-residue pathogenic comparator variants were identified to support PS5 application. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not reside in a statistically significant mutational hotspot as determined by Cancer Hotspots analysis. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,551,598 alleles; AF=0%), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, meeting the PM2 threshold of <0.1% under the generic ACMG/AMP framework. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No pathogenic missense variant has been identified at amino acid residue Thr1884 to serve as a PM5 comparator. The automated PM5 candidate search found zero same-residue candidates. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observation data are available for this variant. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no publications report a de novo occurrence. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No family segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Insufficient data are available to determine whether TET2 has a low rate of benign missense variation and whether missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. TET2 germline disease context is recognized, but gene-level missense constraint metrics (e.g., Z-score) are not available for this assessment. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico tools do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.302 (below the typical pathogenicity threshold of 0.5), BayesDel score is -0.27313 (predicting benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history data are available to determine whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a TET2-related disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar, and OncoKB reports an 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect.' |
clinvar
oncokb
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,551,598 alleles; AF=0%), well below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,551,598 alleles; AF=0%), well below the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data are available regarding observation of this variant in healthy adults where full penetrance would be expected at an early age. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies are available to demonstrate a lack of damaging effect for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family segregation data are available to assess lack of segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Insufficient evidence to determine whether TET2-associated germline disease is primarily caused by truncating variants. While TET2 loss-of-function is a supported disease mechanism, the relative contribution of missense versus truncating variants has not been established. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data (cis or trans) are available for this variant with respect to any other variant in TET2. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no damaging effect. BayesDel score is -0.27313 (benign prediction), REVEL score is 0.302 (neutral, below pathogenicity threshold), and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data are available indicating that this variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies only to synonymous variants. NM_001127208.2:c.5651C>A is a missense substitution (p.Thr1884Asn). |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies only to in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region. This is a missense substitution. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 requires detection in trans with a known pathogenic variant. No phase data or trans observations are available. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants. This is a missense substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.