LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_203407.3:c.860_892delGCCCTGCCCGCCGAGGCCGCGATTCTGCGCCAG
EZHIP
· NP_981952.1:p.(Gly287_Pro297del)
· NM_203407.3
GRCh37: chrX:51150712 TGCGATTCTGCGCCAGGCCCTGCCCGCCGAGGCC>T
·
GRCh38: chrX:51407860 TGCGATTCTGCGCCAGGCCCTGCCCGCCGAGGCC>T
Gene:
EZHIP
Transcript:
NM_203407.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PM4 moderate
Variant details
Gene
EZHIP
Transcript
NM_203407.3
Protein
NP_981952.1:p.(Gly287_Pro297del)
gnomAD AF
2.3885774551360847e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_203407.3:c.860_892del (p.Gly287_Pro297del) is an in-frame deletion of 11 amino acids within exon 1 of EZHIP, a gene for which loss-of-function is a supported germline disease mechanism.
2
This variant is extremely rare in population databases, with an allele frequency of 0.00135% in gnomAD v2.1 (2/147,648 alleles) and 0.00239% in gnomAD v4.1 (13/544,257 alleles), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
As an in-frame deletion in a non-repeat region, the variant meets PM4 at moderate strength per generic ACMG/AMP criteria.
4
PVS1 is not applicable as this in-frame deletion does not fall into the null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice) defined by the ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework.
5
No computational evidence supports pathogenicity (SpliceAI max delta = 0.04; REVEL/BayesDel not applicable to deletions), so PP3 is not met.
6
The variant is absent from ClinVar, and no functional studies, cosegregation data, or de novo reports were identified. Multiple criteria (PS2, PS3, PS4, PS5, PM6, PP1, PP4, BS2, BS3, BS4, BP2, BP5) remain unassessed due to lack of evidence.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_203407.3:c.860_892del is an in-frame deletion (p.Gly287_Pro297del) removing 11 amino acids. This variant does not fall into any ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant bucket (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). Generic PVS1 framework is not applicable to in-frame deletions. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | Variant is absent from ClinVar with no prior pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification by any submitter. No same-variant classification exists to apply PS1. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data available. No publications reporting de novo occurrence of this variant were identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific functional studies identified. OncoKB classifies this variant as 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' and no literature with functional evidence for this variant was found. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or prevalence data available. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no affected-vs-control population data were identified. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No evidence of this variant occurring in trans with a pathogenic variant. EZHIP is X-linked, further complicating trans analysis. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot. Hotspot analysis returned no significance for the deleted region. No gene-specific functional domain mapping is available for PM1 adjudication. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases. gnomAD v2.1 reports an allele frequency of 0.00135% (2/147,648 alleles, 0 homozygotes). gnomAD v4.1 reports 0.00239% (13/544,257 alleles, 0 homozygotes, grpmax FAF = 2.23 × 10⁻⁵). The variant is absent from gnomAD-Canada. All observed frequencies are well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 under generic ACMG/AMP. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 (trans with pathogenic variant in recessive disorder) skipped per user directive. |
|
| PM4 | Met | NM_203407.3:c.860_892del is an in-frame deletion removing 11 amino acids (p.Gly287_Pro297del) within a non-repeat region of EZHIP. In-frame deletions in non-repeat regions meet PM4 at moderate strength under generic ACMG/AMP. The deleted region spans residues 287–297 in exon 1 with no evidence of being a repetitive domain. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 applies to missense variants at the same residue as a known pathogenic missense change. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution, and cannot be evaluated under the classic same-residue PM5 framework. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available. No publications reporting de novo occurrence of this variant were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data available. No family studies reporting this variant were identified. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta = 0.04). REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to in-frame deletions. HCI prior is not supported for EZHIP. No in silico protein structure tools assessed. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or clinical data were provided for this case. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | This variant is absent from ClinVar. No expert panel or reputable source has classified this variant, and no VCEP/CSPEC exists for EZHIP. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The highest observed population allele frequency for this variant is 8.30 × 10⁻⁵ in gnomAD v2.1 (East Asian), well below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest observed population allele frequency for this variant is 8.30 × 10⁻⁵ in gnomAD v2.1 (East Asian), well below the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | This variant is observed at extremely low frequency in gnomAD (2 of 147,648 alleles in v2.1; 13 of 544,257 alleles in v4.1) with zero homozygotes. However, carrier phenotype data are not available, and EZHIP is on the X chromosome, which complicates BS2 assessment without knowing whether carriers were healthy adult hemizygous males or heterozygous females with full penetrance expected early. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies showing no deleterious effect are available for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available. No family studies reporting lack of segregation with disease were identified. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where primarily truncating variants cause disease. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant. EZHIP is X-linked, which further limits standard BP2 assessment. |
|
| BP3 | Not met | This in-frame deletion spans residues 287–297 in exon 1 of EZHIP. There is no evidence confirming this region is a repetitive domain without known function. The deleted sequence contains GC-rich motifs but is not established as a functionally inert repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta = 0.04). However, this is an in-frame deletion whose primary effect is at the protein level, and no protein-level computational tools (e.g., for structural impact of in-frame deletions) were applied. The single line of evidence (SpliceAI) is insufficient to meet BP4. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence of an alternate molecular basis for disease was identified in this case. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | This variant is absent from ClinVar with no reputable source classifying it as benign or likely benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a synonymous substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.