LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001308632.1:c.319C>T
POLD1
· NP_001295561.1:p.(Pro107Ser)
· NM_001308632.1
GRCh37: chr19:50905037 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr19:50401780 C>T
Gene:
POLD1
Transcript:
NM_001308632.1
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
POLD1
Transcript
NM_001308632.1
Protein
NP_001295561.1:p.(Pro107Ser)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001308632.1:c.319C>T (p.Pro107Ser) is a missense variant in exon 3 of POLD1. It is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada population databases (PM2_supporting).
2
Multiple in silico predictors suggest a benign effect: REVEL score 0.015, BayesDel score -0.70, and SpliceAI max delta 0.01 predict no deleterious impact on protein function or splicing (BP4_supporting).
3
This variant has been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 848162) as a Variant of Uncertain Significance by two clinical laboratories (Labcorp, GeneDx) and as Likely benign by one laboratory (Ambry Genetics). No expert panel review has been performed.
4
No variant-specific functional studies, segregation data, case-control analyses, or de novo reports were identified. OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect with no curated functional evidence.
5
Under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules, one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4) result in an overall classification of Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.319C>T, p.Pro107Ser) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. PVS1 is not applicable to missense substitutions. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No evidence that a different nucleotide change at codon 107 resulting in the same Pro107Ser amino acid substitution has been classified as pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data available for this variant. No parental testing or de novo confirmation reported in ClinVar submissions or literature. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies identified. OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect with no curated functional evidence for this variant. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or prevalence data establishing enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls. ClinVar submissions represent isolated clinical observations without cohort-level statistics. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | No family segregation data available. No multigenerational pedigree or linkage analysis data reported. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 107 is not within a recognized mutational hotspot or well-established critical functional domain without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots analysis found no statistically significant clustering at this residue. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases, consistent with rarity. Meets PM2 at supporting level under generic ACMG/AMP (allele frequency below 0.1% threshold). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid residue (Pro107) identified in ClinVar. Automated PM5 candidate harvesting found zero same-residue comparator variants. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo variant reports identified in ClinVar or literature. No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity/paternity testing. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No cosegregation data available. No family studies or pedigree analysis reported for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI Prior scores are not available for POLD1. Cannot assess the rate of benign missense variation in this gene relative to pathogenic missense variation. Insufficient data to determine whether missense variants are a common mechanism of disease in POLD1. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple computational predictors do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.015 (strongly benign-leaning; threshold >0.5 for pathogenic), BayesDel score is -0.70 (benign-leaning; threshold >0.0 for pathogenic), and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta score 0.01). These do not constitute multiple lines of computational evidence supporting pathogenicity. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No specific patient phenotype or family history data provided for assessment. Insufficient clinical information to evaluate phenotype specificity for a POLD1-associated condition. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source classifies this variant as pathogenic. ClinVar reports Uncertain significance from 2 clinical laboratories (Labcorp, GeneDx) and Likely benign from 1 laboratory (Ambry Genetics). The classification framework paper cited by Labcorp (PMID:28492532, Sherloc) is a methods reference, not a source of variant-specific evidence. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, well below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No data on observation of this variant in healthy adult controls. Absence from gnomAD is consistent with rarity but does not constitute observation in confirmed healthy individuals. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect of this specific variant. Computational predictors suggest benign impact but do not constitute functional assay evidence. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No nonsegregation data available. No family studies demonstrating absence of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | POLD1 disease mechanism includes both loss-of-function and missense variants. Pathogenic missense variants in the exonuclease domain are well-established in polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP). POLD1 is not a gene where only truncating variants cause disease. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No data on observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic POLD1 variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.015 (strongly benign-leaning; well below typical pathogenic threshold of 0.5), BayesDel score is -0.70 (benign-leaning), and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta score 0.01). GeneDx clinical submission also noted that in silico analysis supports no alteration of protein structure/function. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternate molecular basis for disease identified in cases carrying this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No consensus benign classification from a reputable source. ClinVar reports mixed classifications: Uncertain significance (Labcorp, GeneDx) and Likely benign (Ambry Genetics). A single Likely benign classification without expert panel review does not meet the threshold for BP6. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.319C>T, p.Pro107Ser), not a synonymous/silent variant. BP7 only applies to synonymous variants without predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.