LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A
CHEK2
· NP_009125.1:p.?
· NM_007194.4
GRCh37: chr22:29092870 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr22:28696882 C>T
Gene:
CHEK2
Transcript:
NM_007194.4
Final call
Likely Benign
BS2 supporting
BP4 supporting
BP6 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CHEK2
Transcript
NM_007194.4
Protein
NP_009125.1:p.?
gnomAD AF
0.00012058471919319746 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant in CHEK2 located at position +19 in intron 10.
2
Computational evidence predicts no splicing impact: SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.00 across all categories, consistent with a neutral intronic change (BP4_Supporting).
3
A homozygous individual for this variant is observed in gnomAD v4.1, which is inconsistent with a highly penetrant autosomal dominant cancer predisposition variant (BS2_Supporting).
4
ClinVar reports this variant as Likely benign by 9 clinical laboratories and Benign by 3 clinical laboratories (Variation ID: 371849), providing reputable source support for a benign interpretation (BP6_Supporting).
5
The variant is observed at population frequencies of 0.017% (gnomAD v2.1) and 0.012% (gnomAD v4.1) with the highest subpopulation frequency of 0.237% in the Middle Eastern population (gnomAD v4.1), which approaches but does not exceed the BS1 threshold of 0.3%.
6
No functional studies, segregation data, case-control enrichment, or variant-specific publications were identified for this variant.
7
Three benign supporting criteria (BP4, BP6, BS2) are met. Under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868), two or more benign supporting criteria support a Likely Benign classification.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant located 19 bases downstream of exon 10, outside the canonical ±1,2 splice donor/acceptor consensus. It does not fall into the null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice consensus required for PVS1 application. The generic PVS1 decision framework confirms apply_generic_pvs1_framework=false. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 requires a different nucleotide change at the same position that has been established as pathogenic. No known pathogenic variant exists at the c.1095+19 position in CHEK2. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo data are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. No publications or ClinVar submissions report de novo occurrence of this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. No publications reporting functional characterization of this variant were identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control enrichment data are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. The variant is observed in 47/282,086 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 and 186/1,542,484 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, consistent with a benign polymorphism rather than enriched in affected individuals. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a criterion in the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 framework (PMID:25741868). The standard pathogenic criteria extend from PVS1 through PP5. No gene-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework defines a PS5 criterion for CHEK2. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is a deep intronic variant located 19 bases downstream of exon 10. It does not reside in a mutational hotspot or well-established critical functional domain. No OncoKB hotspot data support pathogenic clustering at this position. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | PM2 requires absence or extremely low frequency in population databases. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF=0.017% (47/282,086 alleles) and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF=0.012% (186/1,542,484 alleles, including 1 homozygote). While below the 0.1% threshold, the presence of a homozygous individual in an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition gene and frequencies exceeding those expected for a highly penetrant pathogenic variant argue against PM2 application. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders where the variant is detected in trans with a pathogenic variant. CHEK2-related cancer predisposition is autosomal dominant; PM3 is not applicable. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to protein length changes from non-frameshift indels, stop-loss, or initiation codon variants. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is a single nucleotide intronic substitution, not a protein-length altering change. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 applies to novel missense variants occurring at the same amino acid residue as a known pathogenic missense variant. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant with no protein consequence (NP_009125.1:p.?); no amino acid residue can be assigned, making PM5 inapplicable. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo data are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. No publications or ClinVar submissions report de novo occurrence with confirmed maternity and paternity. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. No family studies or linkage data have been reported. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation where missense variants are a common disease mechanism. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant, not a missense change. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta score = 0.00 for all categories: acceptor gain, acceptor loss, donor gain, donor loss). REVEL and BayesDel scores are not available for this intronic variant as they require missense changes. No in silico tool predicts pathogenicity. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history data are available for independent assessment. This adjudication is performed without access to the proband's clinical presentation or family history. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | PP5 requires a reputable source to have recently reported the variant as pathogenic. ClinVar classification for this variant is Likely benign (9 clinical laboratories) and Benign (3 clinical laboratories). No reputable source reports this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | BA1 requires allele frequency >1% in population databases. The highest observed population frequency is 0.237% in the Middle Eastern subpopulation (gnomAD v4.1) and 0.095% in the South Asian subpopulation (gnomAD v2.1). Neither approaches the 1% stand-alone benign threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | BS1 requires allele frequency greater than expected for disorder (>0.3% by non-VCEP threshold). The highest observed population frequency is 0.237% in the Middle Eastern subpopulation (gnomAD v4.1), which approaches but does not exceed the 0.3% threshold. The overall AF across all populations is 0.012–0.017%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Met | A homozygous individual for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is observed in gnomAD v4.1 (1 homozygote among 1,542,484 alleles). CHEK2 is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition gene where biallelic pathogenic variants would be expected to cause a severe or embryonic lethal phenotype. Observation of a homozygote in a population database is inconsistent with a highly penetrant pathogenic role and supports a benign interpretation. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect are available for NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A. While SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (computational, not functional), no experimental studies such as minigene splicing assays or RT-PCR have been performed for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available to assess lack of cosegregation with disease in affected family members. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where primarily truncating variants cause disease. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant, not a missense change. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phasing data are available to assess whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic CHEK2 variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is a single nucleotide intronic substitution, not an in-frame indel. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Computational evidence suggests no impact on splicing. SpliceAI predicts no splice alteration with a maximum delta score of 0.00 across all categories (acceptor gain, acceptor loss, donor gain, donor loss). The variant resides at position +19 in intron 10, well outside the canonical splice consensus, consistent with a neutral intronic change. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data are available indicating an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case carrying this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Met | ClinVar reports NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A as Likely benign by 9 clinical laboratories and Benign by 3 clinical laboratories (Variation ID: 371849). Multiple independent clinical laboratories have reached a benign or likely benign classification, providing reputable source support for a benign interpretation. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is defined for synonymous (silent) variants for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_007194.4:c.1095+19G>A is an intronic variant, not a synonymous coding change. BP7 does not apply. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.