LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T
PRKD1
· NP_002733.2:p.(Glu710Asp)
· NM_002742.3
GRCh37: chr14:30068269 T>A
·
GRCh38: chr14:29599063 T>A
Gene:
PRKD1
Transcript:
NM_002742.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
Variant details
Gene
PRKD1
Transcript
NM_002742.3
Protein
NP_002733.2:p.(Glu710Asp)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T (p.Glu710Asp) is a missense variant in exon 15 of PRKD1.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, meeting PM2 at moderate strength.
3
Missense variants in PRKD1 are an established germline disease mechanism (PMID:32817298 reports de novo p.Gly592Arg and p.Arg603His causing syndromic congenital heart disease with ectodermal dysplasia); BP1 does not apply.
4
In silico predictors yield mixed results — REVEL 0.744 (damaging), BayesDel 0.117 (benign-leaning), SpliceAI 0.00 (neutral) — and do not meet the threshold for either PP3 or BP4.
5
No variant-specific functional data, de novo reports, cosegregation data, ClinVar classification, or case-control evidence are available for this variant.
6
With only one moderate criterion (PM2) met and no supporting or pathogenic moderate criteria, the variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is a missense variant (p.Glu710Asp) in exon 15. It does not fall into the default generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. The variant bucket is 'other' and generic PVS1 framework application is not triggered per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant at the same amino acid position (Glu710) with a different nucleotide change has been identified in ClinVar or the literature. This variant is absent from ClinVar entirely. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo testing data available for NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T. De novo mutations in PRKD1 have been reported at other residues (p.Gly592Arg, p.Arg603His; PMID:32817298) but not at Glu710. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific functional studies have been identified for p.Glu710Asp in PRKD1. OncoKB reports no reviewed functional evidence for this variant. Literature search across PVS1 gene-context papers and evidence pipeline yielded no functional data for this specific change. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or cohort data are available for NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T. The variant is absent from ClinVar and has not been reported in any curated disease or population cohorts. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No reputable source has classified NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant at codon 710 does not lie within a statistically significant mutational hotspot (Cancer Hotspots database negative). No evidence that it resides in a critical functional domain without benign variation. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (exomes), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (genomes). The allele frequency in all large population databases is below the 0.1% generic ACMG PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue ClinVar comparator variants at Glu710 with alternative amino acid substitutions were identified. PM5 candidate harvesting returned zero candidates and was assessed as not applicable. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data are available for this specific variant. PRKD1 de novo missense mutations have been reported in the literature at other residues (p.Gly592Arg, p.Arg603His; PMID:32817298) but none at codon 710. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data are available for NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior data is unavailable for PRKD1; the gene is not in the supported gene list for PP2. Cannot assess whether PRKD1 has a low rate of benign missense variation to satisfy this criterion. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictors show mixed results. REVEL score is 0.744 (above 0.5 damaging threshold), but BayesDel score is 0.117 (below typical 0.27 damaging threshold, benign-leaning) and SpliceAI max delta is 0.00 (no predicted splice impact). Only one of three computational tools suggests a deleterious effect; multiple lines of computational evidence do not converge on a damaging prediction. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype information is available to assess whether this variant is found in an individual with a phenotype specific for PRKD1-related disease (congenital heart disease, ectodermal dysplasia, telangiectasia, brachydactyly). |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1. The allele frequency does not exceed the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is absent from all gnomAD datasets. The allele frequency does not exceed the 0.3% BS1 threshold for generic ACMG. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data are available on observation of NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T in healthy adults to exclude full disease penetrance. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrate no deleterious effect for p.Glu710Asp in PRKD1. No functional data of any kind was identified for this specific variant. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family segregation data are available to demonstrate lack of cosegregation with PRKD1-related disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | PRKD1 missense variants are an established disease mechanism. PMID:32817298 reports de novo missense mutations (p.Gly592Arg, p.Arg603His) causing a telangiectasia-ectodermal dysplasia-brachydactyly-cardiac anomaly syndrome. BP1 applies only when primarily truncating variants cause disease, which is not the case for PRKD1. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data are available on observation of NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T in trans with a known pathogenic PRKD1 variant. PRKD1-associated disease appears to follow autosomal dominant inheritance; trans observation would not be expected in a dominant disorder. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | In silico predictors show mixed results. REVEL score of 0.744 is consistent with a damaging effect, which contradicts the BP4 requirement that multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact. BayesDel (0.117, benign-leaning) and SpliceAI (0.00, neutral) do not independently establish convergent benign predictions. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No case has been reported in which an alternate molecular basis for disease was identified alongside NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source has classified this variant as benign or likely benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_002742.3:c.2130A>T is a missense variant (p.Glu710Asp), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous (silent) variants for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no splice impact and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.