LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_058216.3:c.493A>G
RAD51C
· NP_478123.1:p.(Met165Val)
· NM_058216.3
GRCh37: chr17:56774142 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr17:58696781 A>G
Gene:
RAD51C
Transcript:
NM_058216.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
RAD51C
Transcript
NM_058216.3
Protein
NP_478123.1:p.(Met165Val)
gnomAD AF
1.2390176572406333e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_058216.3:c.493A>G (p.Met165Val) in RAD51C is a missense variant in exon 3. The ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Expert Panel specification for RAD51C (version 1.0.0) does not provide criterion-level rules; assessment follows generic ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada and is extremely rare in gnomAD v4.1 (overall allele frequency 0.00012%, 2/1,614,182 alleles), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.046, BayesDel score -0.475, and SpliceAI max delta 0.00, meeting BP4 at supporting strength.
4
ClinVar reports this variant as uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories) and benign (1 clinical laboratory). No expert panel classification is available. No publication identified mentions this specific variant.
5
No functional studies, segregation data, case-control analyses, or de novo observations were identified for this variant. The variant has not been characterized experimentally.
6
With PM2 (supporting) and BP4 (supporting) as the only applicable criteria, the evidence is balanced but insufficient for a definitive classification; the variant remains a variant of uncertain significance.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not a null variant; missense substitution NM_058216.3:c.493A>G (p.Met165Val) does not fall into PVS1 buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice consensus). |
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No prior pathogenic variant at the same amino acid position (Met165) identified in ClinVar or VCEP materials for comparison. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo observation data with confirmed maternity/paternity available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a deleterious effect for NM_058216.3:c.493A>G were identified. OncoKB reports no variant-specific functional evidence. No publication mentions this variant. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control studies or aggregate patient data reporting NM_058216.3:c.493A>G prevalence in affected versus unaffected individuals were identified. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | ClinVar reports uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories) and benign (1 laboratory); no reputable source classifies this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue Met165 is not located in a known mutational hotspot or well-established critical functional domain. Hotspot analysis confirmed no statistically significant enrichment at this position. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_058216.3:c.493A>G is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and present at extremely low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (overall AF = 0.00012%, 2/1,614,182 alleles; highest subpopulation AF = 0.0016% in Finnish), well below the PM2 threshold of <0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variant at the same residue (Met165) with a different amino acid change was identified in ClinVar for PM5 comparator analysis. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observation (with or without confirmed parentage) has been reported for NM_058216.3:c.493A>G. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No co-segregation data available for NM_058216.3:c.493A>G in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | RAD51C is a moderate-penetrance cancer predisposition gene with both missense and truncating pathogenic variants. No VCEP-specific PP2 rule is available, and insufficient data exist to determine whether RAD51C has a low rate of benign missense variation to meet generic PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.046 (well below 0.5 damaging threshold), BayesDel score -0.475 (negative/benign), and SpliceAI max delta = 0.00 (no splicing impact). These findings support a benign interpretation rather than PP3. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or clinical data specific to NM_058216.3:c.493A>G carriers were identified for phenotype-specificity assessment. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | This variant is not classified as pathogenic by any reputable source. ClinVar reports uncertain significance (3 submitters) and benign (1 submitter). No expert panel classification is available. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases (gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00012%), far below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases (gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00012%), far below the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data on observation of NM_058216.3:c.493A>G in healthy adults in the absence of disease phenotype were identified. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect for NM_058216.3:c.493A>G were identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available to demonstrate lack of co-segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | RAD51C is a tumor suppressor gene in which both missense and truncating variants are established disease mechanisms; a missense change in this gene does not meet BP1, which requires that the gene cause disease primarily through truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation of NM_058216.3:c.493A>G in trans with a known pathogenic variant were identified. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | In-frame deletions/insertions in non-repeat regions are not applicable to this substitution variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no impact: REVEL score 0.046 (well below the 0.5 pathogenic threshold), BayesDel score -0.475 (negative/benign prediction), and SpliceAI max delta score 0.00 (no predicted splicing alteration). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on observation of NM_058216.3:c.493A>G in a case where an alternative molecular basis for disease was identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | One ClinVar submitter (Ambry Genetics) classifies this variant as benign, but this is a single submitter without expert panel review. Generic BP6 requires a reputable source classification; a single clinical laboratory report does not meet this threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_058216.3:c.493A>G is a missense variant (p.Met165Val), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies exclusively to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.