LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_024408.3:c.3570G>C
NOTCH2
· NP_077719.2:p.(Glu1190Asp)
· NM_024408.3
GRCh37: chr1:120478180 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr1:119935557 C>G
Gene:
NOTCH2
Transcript:
NM_024408.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
NOTCH2
Transcript
NM_024408.3
Protein
NP_077719.2:p.(Glu1190Asp)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_024408.3:c.3570G>C (p.Glu1190Asp) in NOTCH2 is absent from all population databases including gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, supporting a rare variant interpretation.
2
Multiple in silico predictors suggest no significant impact: BayesDel predicts a benign score (-0.045) and SpliceAI indicates no splicing impact (max delta 0.07).
3
The variant is a novel missense change at a residue not in a known functional domain or mutational hotspot. No functional studies, segregation data, or de novo reports are available.
4
Applying generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules: PM2 (supporting pathogenic) and BP4 (supporting benign) are both met. The single supporting pathogenic and single supporting benign criterion do not reach the threshold for Likely Pathogenic or Likely Benign.
5
This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | NM_024408.3:c.3570G>C is a missense variant (p.Glu1190Asp) and does not fall into any ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant bucket (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The generic PVS1 decision framework from PMC6185798 does not apply. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant at residue 1190 with the same amino acid change (p.Glu1190Asp) was identified. This variant is absent from ClinVar, and no literature reports an identical change at this position. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation with confirmed paternity and maternity is available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies were identified for this variant. OncoKB reports no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence (classification: Unknown Oncogenic Effect). |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or cohort data demonstrating enrichment of this variant in affected individuals is available. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar with no submitter classifications. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 1190 does not fall within a statistically significant mutational hotspot (CancerHotspots negative). No gene-specific VCEP/ClinGen domain specification is available for NOTCH2 to support a critical functional domain assignment at this position. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_024408.3:c.3570G>C is absent from all population databases: gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0. Under generic ACMG/AMP rules, absence from population databases meets PM2 at supporting strength. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue comparator variants with established pathogenicity were identified. PM5 candidate harvesting was not possible, and no pathogenic variant at residue 1190 with a different amino acid change was found. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation (without confirmation of paternity and maternity) is available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No cosegregation data in affected families is available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | NOTCH2 missense constraint data are not available (HCI prior not found). Without evidence that NOTCH2 has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense is a common disease mechanism, PP2 cannot be applied. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictions are discordant. REVEL score 0.567 is marginally above the 0.5 threshold, but BayesDel score -0.045 is below 0 (predicted benign), and SpliceAI max delta 0.07 indicates no splicing impact. Multiple lines do not consistently support a deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data are available; the variant was assessed as a standalone laboratory finding. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic; it is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | NM_024408.3:c.3570G>C is absent from all population databases. Allele frequency is 0.00%, well below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from all population databases. Allele frequency is 0.00%, below the 0.3% BS1 threshold (non-VCEP). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygous or hemizygous observations in healthy adults, and no trans observation with a known pathogenic variant, are available. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect are available for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data showing lack of cosegregation with disease is available. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | While NOTCH2 loss-of-function is a supported disease mechanism (Alagille syndrome, via NOTCH2-related disorders), missense variants have also been reported as pathogenic in Alagille syndrome. The disease mechanism is not exclusively truncating, so BP1 does not apply. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation in trans with a pathogenic variant in a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder is available. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Variant is not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene product: BayesDel score -0.045 is below 0 (predicted benign) and SpliceAI max delta score 0.07 indicates no splicing impact. REVEL score 0.567 is marginally above 0.5, but the overall in silico consensus favors a benign interpretation (2 of 3 tools predict benign/no impact). |
bayesdel
spliceai
revel
|
| BP5 | Not met | No observation of this variant in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease is available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | c.3570G>C is a missense variant (p.Glu1190Asp), not a synonymous variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.