LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_016507.4:c.2351G>A
CDK12
· NP_057591.2:p.(Arg784Gln)
· NM_016507.4
GRCh37: chr17:37650879 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr17:39494626 G>A
Gene:
CDK12
Transcript:
NM_016507.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
CDK12
Transcript
NM_016507.4
Protein
NP_057591.2:p.(Arg784Gln)
gnomAD AF
1.1183722464743315e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_016507.4:c.2351G>A (p.Arg784Gln) in CDK12 is a missense variant absent from ClinVar and present at extremely low frequency in population databases (gnomAD v2.1: 3/275,404 alleles, AF 0.00109%; gnomAD v4.1: 18/1,609,482 alleles, AF 0.00112%), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
Multiple computational predictors support a benign effect: REVEL score 0.075 (strongly benign), BayesDel score −0.516897 (benign), and SpliceAI max delta 0.01 (no predicted splicing impact), meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
3
No functional studies, de novo observations, segregation data, case-control data, or ClinVar classifications were available to support additional pathogenic or benign criteria.
4
The variant is observed once somatically in COSMIC (COSV104713462) but this does not contribute to germline ACMG/AMP classification.
5
The supporting pathogenic evidence (PM2) is balanced by supporting benign evidence (BP4). No other criteria are met. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_016507.4:c.2351G>A is a missense variant (p.Arg784Gln). It does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. The ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) is not applicable to this variant class. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Arg784Gln) has been reported. This variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect. OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect for this variant. REVEL (0.075) and BayesDel (−0.517) predict benign, and no published functional assays were identified. |
oncokb
revel
bayesdel
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected vs. general population are available for this variant. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | This variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source reports it as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 784 does not lie within a statistically significant mutational hotspot, and the variant is not listed in the Cancer Hotspots database. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at extremely low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 AF = 0.00109% (3/275,404 alleles), gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00112% (18/1,609,482 alleles), and is absent from gnomAD-Canada. The highest subpopulation frequency is 0.028% in gnomAD v2.1 Remaining individuals, well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No pathogenic missense comparator variants at the same residue (Arg784) were identified in ClinVar; PM5 candidate harvesting returned no eligible comparators. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No cosegregation data available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | PP2 requires a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. CDK12 germline disease association is primarily through prostate cancer susceptibility, not a well-characterized Mendelian disorder with established missense constraint metrics. Insufficient evidence to apply PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple computational tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.075 (strongly benign, well below 0.5 threshold), BayesDel score −0.516897 (benign), and SpliceAI max delta 0.01 (no predicted splicing impact). These do not support a deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype information was provided for this case. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | This variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source reports it as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The maximum population allele frequency (0.028% in gnomAD v2.1 Remaining individuals) is far below the 1% threshold for BA1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The maximum population allele frequency (0.028% in gnomAD v2.1 Remaining individuals) is below the 0.3% threshold for BS1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygous individuals have been observed in gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, or gnomAD-Canada. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect. While in silico predictors favor benign (REVEL 0.075, BayesDel −0.517), these do not constitute well-established functional evidence per ACMG/AMP guidelines. |
revel
bayesdel
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available to assess lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | BP1 applies when a missense variant occurs in a gene where primarily truncating variants cause disease. While CDK12 loss of function is a supported germline disease mechanism, the available literature does not establish that the disease is caused primarily by truncating variants; both missense and truncating DDR gene variants are reported in prostate cancer cohorts. Insufficient evidence to confidently apply BP1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data available regarding observation in trans with a pathogenic variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | In-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive region not relevant to this substitution variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on the gene product: REVEL score 0.075 (strongly benign, far below 0.5 threshold), BayesDel score −0.516897 (benign), and SpliceAI max delta score 0.01 (no predicted splicing alteration). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data available regarding an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | This variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source reports it as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.2351G>A, p.Arg784Gln), not a synonymous variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants without predicted splicing impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.