LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006206.6:c.2525A>T
PDGFRA
· NP_006197.1:p.(Asp842Val)
· NM_006206.6
GRCh37: chr4:55152093 A>T
·
GRCh38: chr4:54285926 A>T
Gene:
PDGFRA
Transcript:
NM_006206.6
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 moderate
PM1 moderate
PM2 moderate
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PDGFRA
Transcript
NM_006206.6
Protein
NP_006197.1:p.(Asp842Val)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PM1 (moderate): p.Asp842 is located in the activation loop (exon 18) of the PDGFRA tyrosine kinase domain, a critical functional domain and statistically significant mutational hotspot.
2
PM2 (moderate): The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada.
3
PS3 (moderate): Multiple independent functional studies demonstrate that PDGFRA D842V is a constitutively activating, gain-of-function mutation with ligand-independent autophosphorylation and transforming activity. Strength is limited to moderate because all functional evidence derives from somatic GIST contexts.
4
PP3 (supporting): REVEL predicts a damaging effect (score 0.861). BayesDel is intermediate (0.343) and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (0.02), but REVEL provides supporting computational evidence of pathogenicity.
5
Classification: Likely Pathogenic. Three moderate criteria (PM1 + PM2 + PS3) and one supporting criterion (PP3) meet the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 threshold for Likely Pathogenic (3 moderate, or 2 moderate + 2 supporting).
6
Caveat: All functional and prevalence evidence is derived from somatic (GIST) contexts. This variant has not been observed in any germline case. A definitive germline classification is constrained by this limitation.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Pathogenic classification based on the observed combination of pathogenic criteria.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_006206.6:c.2525A>T is a missense variant (p.Asp842Val) and does not fall into the default generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 applies when the same amino acid change results from a different nucleotide change that has been established as pathogenic. No alternative nucleotide change producing p.Asp842Val with an established pathogenic classification is available. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data are available for this variant. No family studies or parent-of-origin testing results were identified. |
|
| PS3 | Met | PDGFRA D842V has been characterized as a gain-of-function, constitutively activating mutation in multiple independent functional studies across several cell line systems (CHO, 293T, Ba/F3), demonstrating ligand-independent autophosphorylation and transforming activity. Five independent publications confirmed constitutive kinase activation. All functional evidence derives from somatic GIST contexts; no germline-specific functional studies are available, which limits the strength applied. |
PMID:12522257
PMID:12949711
PMID:15928335
PMID:15685537
PMID:16030188
PMID:17087943
|
| PS4 | Not met | D842V is the most common PDGFRA mutation in sporadic GIST (181/289 published cases) and is reported 211 times in COSMIC. However, all case observations are somatic; no germline case with this variant has been reported. PS4 requires significantly increased prevalence in affected individuals versus controls in a germline context, which cannot be established from somatic data alone. |
PMID:15928335
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a standard ACMG/AMP 2015 criterion. Under the generic ACMG framework, no PS5 rule is defined. |
|
| PM1 | Met | Asp842 is located in the activation loop (exon 18) of the PDGFRA tyrosine kinase domain, a critical functional domain. This residue lies within a statistically significant mutational hotspot and is the most frequently mutated codon in PDGFRA-driven GIST. |
PMID:15928335
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (exomes/genomes), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, meeting the PM2 threshold for absence from population databases (allele frequency <0.1%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No comparator missense variants at codon 842 with a confirmed pathogenic classification were identified. Automated candidate harvesting was unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data are available. PM6 cannot be applied without confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity/paternity confirmation. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available for this variant. No family studies were identified. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior score is not available for PDGFRA. The gene is not included in the HCI prior database, so the proportion of benign missense variants in this gene cannot be calculated. |
|
| PP3 | Met | REVEL predicts a damaging effect (score 0.861, well above the 0.5 threshold). BayesDel score is 0.343 (intermediate). SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.02). Multiple in silico lines are mixed, but REVEL strongly supports pathogenicity, providing supporting-level evidence. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype data or clinical information was provided for this case. PP4 requires the patient's phenotype or family history to be highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar aggregate classification for this variant is Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). The OMIM submission classifies it as Pathogenic, but lacks assertion criteria and is based on literature only with somatic origin. This does not meet the threshold for a reputable source recently reporting the variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada). Allele frequency is 0.0%, well below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all population databases. Allele frequency is 0.0%, well below the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data on healthy adult carriers are available. The variant is absent from gnomAD, so no observation in a healthy adult has been documented. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | Well-established functional studies consistently demonstrate a gain-of-function effect: constitutive autophosphorylation, ligand-independent kinase activation, and transforming activity. These findings are not supportive of a benign interpretation. |
PMID:12522257
PMID:12949711
PMID:15928335
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | PDGFRA germline disease is caused by gain-of-function missense mutations (e.g., Y555C in familial GIST), not solely by truncating variants. BP1 is not applicable when missense variants are a known disease mechanism. |
PMID:17087943
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on trans configuration with a known pathogenic variant are available. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | REVEL predicts a damaging effect (0.861). While BayesDel is intermediate (0.343) and SpliceAI shows no splicing impact, the computational evidence overall does not support a benign interpretation. REVEL strongly supports pathogenicity. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant are available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source reports this variant as benign. ClinVar aggregate classification is Uncertain significance. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution (c.2525A>T, p.Asp842Val), not a synonymous variant. BP7 only applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.