LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000059.4:c.7977-15T>G
BRCA2
· NP_000050.3:p.?
· NM_000059.4
GRCh37: chr13:32937301 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr13:32363164 T>G
Gene:
BRCA2
Transcript:
NM_000059.4
Final call
VUS
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.4
Protein
NP_000050.3:p.?
gnomAD AF
1.2467491017172721e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_000059.4:c.7977-15T>G is an intronic substitution located 15 bases upstream of BRCA2 exon 18, outside the canonical acceptor splice site consensus (+/-1,2). SpliceAI predicts no significant impact on splicing (max delta = 0.03), supporting a benign bioinformatic assessment under ENIGMA BP4_Supporting.
2
This variant is extremely rare in population databases, present in 2 of 1,604,172 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF = 1.25e-06), both in the European non-Finnish population. It is absent from gnomAD v2.1. The FAF of 2.8e-07 does not meet ENIGMA BS1 thresholds for benign population evidence, nor does it meet BA1 stand-alone benign criteria.
3
In a multifactorial likelihood analysis by Parsons et al. 2019 (PMID:31131967), this variant had a combined likelihood ratio of 1.11 (co-occurrence LR = 1.02; family history LR = 1.08), which falls within the neutral zone and does not provide evidence for either pathogenicity (PP4) or benignity (BP5).
4
The variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign by 4 clinical laboratories and as Uncertain significance by 2 laboratories (ClinVar ID: 96863), though no expert panel classification has been assigned.
5
The adjacent canonical splice acceptor variant c.7977-1G>C is a well-established pathogenic variant (Parsons et al. 2019 posterior probability = 0.999; IARC Class 5), but c.7977-15T>G does not disrupt the splice consensus and is predicted to be splicing-neutral by SpliceAI.
6
Overall, only BP4_Supporting is met. Under the ENIGMA Table 3 combining rules, a single supporting benign criterion does not reach the threshold for Likely Benign (which requires either Strong_benign + Supporting_benign or >= 2 Supporting_benign). This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
A single Supporting_benign criterion (BP4_Supporting) does not meet any ENIGMA Table 3 Likely Benign combination (requires >=2 Supporting_benign or 1 Strong/Moderate_benign + 1 Supporting_benign), and falls in the VUS range (-1 to 5) under the ENIGMA point system.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Intronic variant at c.7977-15, 15 bases upstream of exon 18 acceptor site. Not a canonical +/-1,2 splice consensus variant. Does not meet the ENIGMA PVS1 definition of a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice site, initiation codon, or exon deletion). No mRNA assay data suggestive of a damaging splicing effect (SpliceAI max delta = 0.03). |
cspec
spliceai
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified at the c.7977-15 position with the same predicted splicing effect. No comparator variant found in ENIGMA VCEP materials or ClinVar expert panel submissions. |
cspec
clinvar
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS2 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks PS2 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not met | Not listed in ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 (curated functional assay results for BRCA2). No functional assay data demonstrating a damaging effect on protein function or splicing for this intronic variant. The adjacent canonical splice variant c.7977-1G>C is pathogenic, but the -15 position has no functional evidence. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control study data available. Not listed in ENIGMA ST7 reference set. Variant absent from COSMIC. ClinVar submissions do not include PS4-level case-control evidence. Published literature reviewed consists of clinical practice guidelines and policy statements with no variant-specific case data. |
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
clinvar
|
| PS5 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks PS5 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | N/A | ENIGMA VCEP specification states PM1 is considered as a component of bioinformatic analysis (PP3/BP4) rather than an independent criterion. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | Under ENIGMA PM2_Supporting, the variant must be absent from both gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only) and gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer). The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 but is present in gnomAD v3.1/v4.1 with 1 genome allele and 2 total alleles (all in European non-Finnish, an outbred population). Additionally, ENIGMA states a single observation in an outbred population is not informative; here there are 2 observations. The variant does not meet the strict 'absent from both' requirement. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | ENIGMA PM5 is repurposed for protein termination codon (PTC) logic (PM5_PTC). This intronic substitution at -15 is not a PTC variant. Classic same-residue missense PM5 is not applicable to intronic variants. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks PM6 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data available. The variant was included in the Easton et al. 2007 dataset with 1 family history score entry (SuppT2 of Parsons et al. 2019), but no quantitative co-segregation LR has been calculated. The ENIGMA PP1 rule requires LR >= 2.08 for supporting evidence. |
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
cspec
|
| PP2 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks PP2 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | ENIGMA PP3 for intronic variants outside donor/acceptor +/-1,2 positions requires SpliceAI delta >= 0.2. The SpliceAI max delta score for this variant is 0.03, well below the threshold. This is an intronic variant, not a missense substitution, so the BayesDel protein prediction pathway does not apply. |
spliceai
cspec
|
| PP4 | Not met | Not found in the Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) clinical history LR table for BRCA2. The variant was assessed in Parsons et al. 2019 multifactorial analysis (SuppT1 of HUMU-40-1557-s001): combined LR = 1.11 (co-occurrence LR = 1.02; family history LR = 1.08). The combined LR of 1.11 falls within the neutral zone (>0.48, <2.08) and does not reach the ENIGMA PP4_Supporting threshold of LR >= 2.08. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification states PP5 is Not Applicable for this VCEP, as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | ENIGMA BA1 requires FAF > 0.1% (0.001) in gnomAD non-founder populations. The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07 (0.000028%), well below the BA1 stand-alone benign threshold. The variant is extremely rare in population databases. |
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | ENIGMA BS1_Strong requires FAF > 0.01% (0.0001); BS1_Supporting requires FAF > 0.002% (0.00002) and <= 0.01%. The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07 (0.000028%), which does not exceed either threshold. The variant is too rare to meet BS1 at any strength. |
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | ENIGMA BS2 requires assessment of absence of Fanconi Anemia phenotype features in probands with co-occurrent variants in BRCA2. No proband-level phenotype data or co-occurrence data are available for this variant. Cannot assign BS2 without individual-level data. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not met | Not listed in ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 (curated functional assay results for BRCA2). No published functional studies demonstrating a benign effect on protein function or splicing for this intronic variant. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | ENIGMA BS4 requires quantitative lack of segregation in affected family members (LR <= 0.48 for Supporting). No segregation data are available. The Parsons et al. 2019 SuppT1 combined LR of 1.11 is in the neutral zone, not meeting BS4 thresholds. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| BP1 | N/A | ENIGMA BP1 applies to silent substitutions, missense variants, or in-frame indels outside clinically important functional domains. This is an intronic substitution at c.7977-15; it is not a silent, missense, or in-frame coding variant. BP1 is not applicable to intronic variants. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks BP2 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Met | Intronic variant at c.7977-15, outside the native acceptor splice site +/-1,2 positions. SpliceAI max delta score = 0.03 (<= 0.1), predicting no significant splicing impact. Meets ENIGMA BP4_Supporting criteria for intronic variants outside canonical splice sites with no predicted splicing effect. |
spliceai
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not met | Not found in the Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) clinical history LR table for BRCA2. The Parsons et al. 2019 combined LR of 1.11 falls in the neutral zone (>0.48, <2.08) and does not meet the ENIGMA BP5_Supporting threshold of LR <= 0.48. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | ENIGMA BRCA2 VCEP specification marks BP6 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not met | ENIGMA BP7_Supporting for intronic variants requires position at or beyond +7 (donor) or -21 (acceptor) AND BP4 met. This variant is at c.7977-15, which is 15 bases upstream of exon 18, within the -21 boundary of the acceptor splice site. Does not satisfy the positional requirement. BP7_Strong (RNA) requires mRNA assay data showing no damaging effect; no RNA assay data are available. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP3 | N/A | ENIGMA VCEP specification states BP3 is captured by bioinformatic tool prediction and domain analysis; not independently applied. |
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | Skipped per user directive. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Skipped per user directive. Additionally, ENIGMA VCEP marks PM4 as Not Applicable. |
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.