LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001128425.2:c.1255G>A
MUTYH
· NP_001121897.1:p.(Ala419Thr)
· NM_001128425.2
GRCh37: chr1:45797160 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr1:45331488 C>T
Gene:
MUTYH
Transcript:
NM_001128425.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
MUTYH
Transcript
NM_001128425.2
Protein
NP_001121897.1:p.(Ala419Thr)
gnomAD AF
8.735745555612005e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
This variant is a missense substitution (NM_001128425.2:c.1255G>A, p.Ala419Thr) in exon 13 of MUTYH.
2
The variant is present at very low frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (AF=0.00672%, 19/282,560 alleles, 0 homozygotes) and v4.1 (AF=0.00874%, 141/1,614,058 alleles, 1 homozygote), and is absent from gnomAD-Canada, meeting PM2 at the supporting level.
3
Multiple in silico tools predict no damaging effect: REVEL score 0.414 (below the 0.5 pathogenic threshold), BayesDel score -0.184886 (benign-leaning), and SpliceAI delta score 0.00 (no predicted splice impact), meeting BP4 at the supporting level.
4
No functional studies, segregation data, de novo observations, or variant-specific literature have been identified for this variant. The MUTYH VCEP (InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Specification v1.0.0) framework was present but incomplete with no gene-specific criteria rules; generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria were applied.
5
In ClinVar, the variant is reported as Uncertain significance by 11 of 14 submitters. Ambry Genetics classifies as Benign and Labcorp/Invitae as Likely benign, though the underlying evidence is not publicly accessible. The single homozygote in gnomAD v4.1 warrants attention for a recessive disorder but lacks phenotype data.
6
The only applicable criteria are PM2_supporting (pathogenic supporting) and BP4_supporting (benign supporting). These oppose each other, resulting in conflicting evidence insufficient to classify beyond Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.1255G>A, p.Ala419Thr); PVS1 applies only to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1,2 splice consensus, initiation codon, or exon-level deletions). The variant does not fall into any PVS1 null-variant bucket per ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No evidence that the same amino acid change (p.Ala419Thr) has been established as pathogenic in a different nucleotide change in MUTYH. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation reported for this variant. No parentage-confirmed de novo data available in ClinVar submissions or published literature. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies have been reported. ClinVar submitters explicitly state 'functional studies have not been reported for this variant.' OncoKB did not identify variant-specific functional evidence. In silico scores (REVEL 0.414, BayesDel -0.185) are computational predictions, not functional assay data. |
gnomad_v2
clinvar
oncokb
revel
bayesdel
|
| PS4 | Not met | The variant is present in gnomAD at low frequency (v2.1: AF=0.0067%, 19/282,560; v4.1: AF=0.0087%, 141/1,614,058 with 1 homozygote), which argues against significant enrichment in affected individuals. No case-control study demonstrating statistically significant enrichment in affected vs. controls has been identified. While the variant has been observed in individuals with colorectal cancer and suspected Lynch syndrome per ClinVar reports, the population frequency and lack of controlled association data do not meet PS4. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | PS5 requires data from a well-established assay showing a damaging effect, supported by strong in silico data. No variant-specific functional assay evidence exists, and in silico predictions are mixed to benign-leaning (REVEL 0.414, BayesDel -0.185). |
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant is located at residue 419 (p.Ala419Thr), which does not lie in a statistically significant somatic or germline hotspot. The hotspot analysis confirms the variant is not in a known functional domain cluster with excess pathogenic variation. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD-Canada and present at very low frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (AF=0.00672%, 19/282,560 alleles, 0 homozygotes) and v4.1 (AF=0.00874%, 141/1,614,058 alleles, 1 homozygote). Both frequencies are well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. The single homozygote in v4.1 is noted but does not negate PM2 at the supporting level given the overall rarity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue comparator variants identified. PM5 candidate harvesting could not confirm classic same-residue pathogenic comparator semantics (different amino acid change at p.Ala419 with established pathogenicity). |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation reported for this variant. No parentage-confirmed data available. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data available. No family studies demonstrating cosegregation of this variant with disease phenotype have been identified. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | PP2 applies to genes where missense variants are a well-established mechanism of disease and the gene has a low rate of benign missense variation. MUTYH-associated polyposis is caused by both missense and truncating variants, but MUTYH also has a substantial number of rare missense variants in the general population. The variant does not meet PP2 without gene-level calibration of benign missense constraint. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictions are mixed and do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.414 (below the typical pathogenic threshold of 0.5). BayesDel score is -0.184886 (benign-leaning; negative values indicate benign prediction). SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00). Multiple ClinVar submitters note that in silico tools predict a benign effect (e.g., 'three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect'). The weight of computational evidence favors a benign interpretation, supporting BP4 rather than PP3. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | PP4 requires a highly specific phenotype or family history consistent with a single genetic etiology. While MUTYH variants are associated with colorectal polyposis/cancer, the phenotype is not sufficiently specific (overlaps with FAP, AFAP, Lynch syndrome, and sporadic CRC). The variant has been reported in individuals with diverse phenotypes including colorectal cancer, suspected Lynch syndrome, and breast cancer, further reducing phenotypic specificity. |
clinvar
|
| PP5 | Not met | PP5 requires that a reputable source (e.g., expert clinical laboratory with strong reputation) has recently classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic with supporting evidence not available to this assessment. The majority of ClinVar submitters classify this as Uncertain significance (11 of 14). One submitter (Ambry Genetics) classifies as Benign and one (Labcorp/Invitae) as Likely benign. No reputable source has classified this as pathogenic. The preponderance of clinical opinion is VUS or benign-leaning. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant frequency in gnomAD is well below the 1% BA1 threshold (v2.1: AF=0.0067%; v4.1: AF=0.0087%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant frequency in gnomAD is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold (v2.1: AF=0.0067%; v4.1: AF=0.0087%). The presence of 1 homozygote in v4.1 is noted but does not elevate the allele frequency above 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | BS2 requires observation in a healthy adult homozygous for a recessive disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. While 1 homozygote is observed in gnomAD v4.1, the phenotype of this individual is unknown. Without confirmation that this individual is a healthy adult, BS2 cannot be applied. Additionally, MUTYH-associated polyposis has variable expressivity and age-dependent penetrance, complicating the application of BS2 without detailed phenotype data. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | BS3 requires well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies showing no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. No variant-specific functional studies have been performed. In silico predictions (REVEL 0.414, BayesDel -0.185) are computational only and do not constitute functional assay evidence under BS3. |
clinvar
revel
bayesdel
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data demonstrating lack of cosegregation with disease. No family studies involving this variant have been identified. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where only truncating variants cause disease. MUTYH-associated polyposis is caused by both missense (e.g., Y165C, G382D) and truncating pathogenic variants. Multiple MUTYH missense variants have established pathogenicity with functional validation, so BP1 does not apply. |
PMID:17161978
|
| BP2 | Not met | BP2 requires observation in trans with a known pathogenic variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant in a dominant disorder in a healthy individual. No such observation has been reported for this variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest this variant does not impact protein function. REVEL score is 0.414 (below the 0.5 pathogenic threshold). BayesDel score is -0.184886 (negative scores indicate benign prediction). SpliceAI predicts no splice impact (max delta = 0.00). ClinVar submitters note that multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect (e.g., 'three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect'; 'computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function'). The convergent in silico evidence supports BP4. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
clinvar
|
| BP5 | Not met | BP5 requires that the variant be found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease (e.g., a second pathogenic variant in another gene explaining the phenotype). No such data available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | BP6 requires a reputable source to classify the variant as benign/likely benign with evidence not available to this assessment. While Ambry Genetics (a reputable clinical laboratory) classifies this variant as Benign and Labcorp/Invitae classifies as Likely benign, the evidence underlying these classifications is not accessible for verification. The majority of submitters (11 of 14) classify as VUS. Without access to the internal data supporting the Benign/Likely benign classifications, BP6 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies only to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant is a missense substitution (c.1255G>A, p.Ala419Thr), not a synonymous variant. BP7 is therefore not applicable. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Skipped per adjudication instructions — trivially not applicable (in-frame indel criterion, variant is a substitution). |
|
| PM3 | N/A | Skipped per adjudication instructions — trivially not applicable (requires recessive disorder with second pathogenic allele in trans; not on assess list). |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Skipped per adjudication instructions — trivially not applicable (protein length change criterion; variant is a substitution). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.