LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004936.3:c.125G>A
CDKN2B
· NP_004927.2:p.(Gly42Glu)
· NM_004936.3
GRCh37: chr9:22008828 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr9:22008829 C>T
Gene:
CDKN2B
Transcript:
NM_004936.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
CDKN2B
Transcript
NM_004936.3
Protein
NP_004927.2:p.(Gly42Glu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The variant NM_004936.3:c.125G>A (p.Gly42Glu) in CDKN2B is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
Multiple in silico predictors consistently indicate a benign effect: REVEL 0.067, BayesDel -0.40492, and SpliceAI max delta 0.01, meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
3
The variant has not been reported in ClinVar, COSMIC, or the published literature. No functional data, segregation data, case-control data, or de novo observations are available.
4
With one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), the evidence is equivocal. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.125G>A, p.Gly42Glu) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant at the same amino acid position (Gly42) has been reported in ClinVar or the published literature, so PS1 cannot be applied. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No parental or pedigree data are available to assess de novo occurrence of this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional experimental data exist for this variant or for a systematically characterized range that includes residue Gly42. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect. No variant-specific functional studies were identified in the literature. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or cohort data comparing the prevalence of this variant in affected individuals versus controls are available. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | CDKN2B is associated with autosomal dominant cancer predisposition (renal cell carcinoma); it is not a recessive disorder gene. PS5 applies only to recessive disorders where the variant is found in trans with a pathogenic variant. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. No domain-level functional characterization data specific to the CDKN2B N-terminal region around residue Gly42 are available in the case evidence to support PM1 application. |
|
| PM2 | Met | The variant is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada), meeting the PM2 threshold for a rare variant in a gene where the variant has not been observed in large population cohorts. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue (Gly42) comparator variants with pathogenic classification were identified in ClinVar. PM5 candidate harvesting was not possible for this variant. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo data are available for this variant; PM6 cannot be applied without a reported de novo observation. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No family segregation data are available to assess co-segregation of this variant with disease. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | Insufficient data to apply PP2. Missense constraint metrics (z-score, HCI prior) are not available for CDKN2B; the HCI prior lookup returned 'gene_not_supported'. It cannot be determined whether this gene has a low rate of benign missense variation. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico predictors consistently indicate a benign effect: REVEL score 0.067, BayesDel score -0.40492, and SpliceAI max delta 0.01. In silico evidence does not support a pathogenic role and instead supports benign through BP4. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or clinical information is available to assess whether the individual's presentation is specific for a CDKN2B-associated disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada. The allele frequency does not exceed the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from all population databases. The allele frequency does not exceed the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No data on healthy adult carriers are available to assess whether this variant is observed in individuals without disease for a fully penetrant disorder. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate that this variant has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. In silico predictors alone are insufficient for BS3; they are captured under BP4. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data are available to assess lack of segregation with disease in affected family members. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | CDKN2B germline missense variants are a recognized disease mechanism. PMID:25873077 identified germline missense mutations in CDKN2B predisposing to renal cell carcinoma. BP1 applies only when truncating variants are the sole known mechanism, which is not the case for CDKN2B. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No data are available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence consistently predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.067 (benign range), BayesDel score -0.40492 (benign range), and SpliceAI max delta score 0.01 (no predicted splicing impact). All three in silico tools concordantly support a benign interpretation. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No data are available regarding an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported this variant as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant (c.125G>A, p.Gly42Glu) is a missense substitution, not a synonymous variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.