LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002944.2:c.5977G>A
ROS1
· NP_002935.2:p.(Glu1993Lys)
· NM_002944.2
GRCh37: chr6:117639379 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr6:117318216 C>T
Gene:
ROS1
Transcript:
NM_002944.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ROS1
Transcript
NM_002944.2
Protein
NP_002935.2:p.(Glu1993Lys)
gnomAD AF
6.199897081708444e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_002944.2:c.5977G>A (p.Glu1993Lys) is a missense variant in ROS1, a receptor tyrosine kinase with germline disease associations in familial lung cancer and hereditary breast cancer.
2
This variant is extremely rare in population databases: absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and present in gnomAD v4.1 at a global frequency of 6.2e-7 (1/1,612,930 alleles), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
The variant is absent from ClinVar and has not been reported in the literature with variant-specific evidence. No functional studies, segregation data, or case-control associations are available.
4
In silico predictions are discordant: REVEL (0.739) predicts a deleterious effect while BayesDel (0.237) and SpliceAI (max delta 0.06) do not, failing to meet criteria for PP3 or BP4.
5
With only PM2 (supporting) met, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under the ACMG/AMP 2015 framework.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense substitution (p.Glu1993Lys) that does not fall into the null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus) required for PVS1 application per the ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No known pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Glu1993Lys) has been identified in ClinVar or the literature. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No evidence of de novo occurrence has been reported for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies or systematic-range characterization encompassing position p.Glu1993 have been identified. OncoKB assigns Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no supporting literature. The single COSMIC somatic observation (COSV107471481) provides no functional characterization. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control association studies or statistical evidence of enrichment in affected individuals have been identified for this variant. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a standard criterion in the ACMG/AMP 2015 classification framework and no gene-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework is available for ROS1. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Position p.Glu1993 lies in the C-terminal tail of the ROS1 receptor tyrosine kinase, beyond the catalytic kinase domain. This residue is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org, and no published functional domain characterization was identified that specifically defines this C-terminal region as a critical domain where missense variants are established as pathogenic. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases. It is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada. In gnomAD v4.1, the global allele frequency is 6.2e-7 (1/1,612,930 alleles; 0.000062%), well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2. The highest subpopulation frequency is in European (non-Finnish) at 8.48e-7 (1/1,179,298 alleles). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variants at the same amino acid residue (p.Glu1993) have been identified in ClinVar to serve as PM5 comparators. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo occurrence has been reported for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | No gene-level constraint metrics (missense Z-score or o/e ratio) were available to determine whether ROS1 has a low rate of benign missense variation. Without such data, PP2 cannot be applied. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | REVEL score of 0.739 exceeds the deleterious threshold (>0.7), but BayesDel score of 0.237 is below the damaging threshold, and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score 0.06). Only one of three computational predictors supports a deleterious effect; multiple lines of computational evidence are required for PP3. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No clinical phenotype or family history data are available for this case to evaluate phenotypic specificity. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not a standard criterion in the ACMG/AMP 2015 classification framework and no gene-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework is available for ROS1. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | Global allele frequency of 6.2e-7 (0.000062%) in gnomAD v4.1 is well below the 1% threshold required for BA1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | Global allele frequency of 6.2e-7 (0.000062%) in gnomAD v4.1 is well below the 0.3% threshold required for BS1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | The single gnomAD v4.1 observation (1/1,612,930 alleles) does not constitute observation at significant frequency in healthy adults. No evidence this variant has been observed in multiple healthy individuals. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No functional studies demonstrating a lack of deleterious effect are available for this variant. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data are available to demonstrate lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | Germline missense variants in ROS1 have been reported in disease contexts including familial lung cancer (PMID:41390056) and hereditary breast cancer (PMID:32906649), indicating that pathogenicity in ROS1 is not limited to truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No evidence of this variant observed in trans with a known pathogenic ROS1 variant. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | REVEL score of 0.739 is above the deleterious threshold, predicting a damaging effect. BayesDel (0.237) and SpliceAI (max delta 0.06) are non-supportive, but multiple lines of computational evidence do not suggest a benign impact. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No evidence of an alternative molecular basis for disease has been identified in an individual carrying this variant. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not a standard criterion in the ACMG/AMP 2015 classification framework and no gene-specific VCEP/CSPEC framework is available for ROS1. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant resulting in an amino acid change (p.Glu1993Lys). BP7 applies only to synonymous/silent variants or variants predicted to have no impact on splicing. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.