LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001122740.1:c.1661G>A
ESR1
· NP_001116212.1:p.(Ser554Asn)
· NM_001122740.1
GRCh37: chr6:152419974 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr6:152098839 G>A
Gene:
ESR1
Transcript:
NM_001122740.1
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ESR1
Transcript
NM_001122740.1
Protein
NP_001116212.1:p.(Ser554Asn)
gnomAD AF
1.8586692671514902e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001122740.1:c.1661G>A (p.Ser554Asn) is a missense variant in exon 9 of ESR1 encoding estrogen receptor alpha.
2
The variant is extremely rare in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency 7.07×10⁻⁶ (2/282,762 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 1.86×10⁻⁶ (3/1,614,058 alleles), both well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 at supporting strength.
3
The variant is absent from ClinVar; no clinical laboratory or expert panel classification exists.
4
No functional studies, de novo observations, segregation data, case-control comparisons, or literature citations mentioning this specific variant were identified.
5
In silico predictors are mixed: BayesDel (−0.538) predicts benign, SpliceAI (max delta 0.0) predicts no splicing alteration, and REVEL (0.213) is in the indeterminate range.
6
Residue 554 lies C-terminal to the ligand-binding domain (LBD, aa ~302–552) and is not within a known critical functional domain or statistically significant mutational hotspot.
7
PVS1 does not apply (missense variant); PM5 does not apply (no same-residue comparator variants identified).
8
The only applicable criterion is PM2 at supporting strength. Per ACMG/AMP 2015 classification rules (PMID:25741868), a single supporting pathogenic criterion without any other evidence is insufficient for classification as likely pathogenic or pathogenic.
9
This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense variant (p.Ser554Asn); PVS1 applies only to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice ±1,2). Per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798), this variant does not fall into any eligible null-variant bucket. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PS1 | Not met | No known pathogenic variant with a different amino acid change at the same position (Ser554) has been reported in ClinVar or the literature. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation with confirmed maternity and paternity has been reported for this variant in the literature or ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not met | No experimental functional studies testing this exact variant or a systematically characterized range that includes residue 554 were identified. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect.' In silico predictors (REVEL 0.213, BayesDel −0.538) do not support a damaging functional effect. |
oncokb
revel
bayesdel
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or cohort prevalence data are available to assess enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No alternative variant at nucleotide position c.1661 with a different alternate allele has been classified as pathogenic in ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 554 lies C-terminal to the ESR1 ligand-binding domain (LBD, residues ~302–552) and AF-2 activation helix (helix 12, ~535–552); it is not within a known critical functional domain. Neither the residue nor the exact variant is a statistically significant mutational hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). |
oncokb
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is extremely rare in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency 7.07×10⁻⁶ (2/282,762 alleles), gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 1.86×10⁻⁶ (3/1,614,058 alleles), grpmax FAF 7.39×10⁻⁶. All frequencies are well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. Absent from gnomAD-Canada. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | Unable to confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics; no comparator variant at residue 554 with a different alternate amino acid and pathogenic classification was identified. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant in the literature or ClinVar; PM6 requires confirmed de novo status with maternity/paternity testing. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data are available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | ESR1 is not recognized as a gene where missense variants are a well-established predominant mechanism of germline disease. While somatic missense mutations in ESR1 are well-described in hormone-resistant breast cancer, the gene lacks a well-characterized germline disease spectrum meeting PP2 criteria. |
oncokb
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico tools do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.213 is in the indeterminate range (threshold for pathogenicity >0.5), BayesDel score −0.538 is negative (predicts benign), and SpliceAI max delta score is 0.0 (no predicted splicing impact). No HCI prior score is available for ESR1. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No clinical phenotype information for the proband is available; cannot assess specificity of presentation for ESR1-related disease. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable clinical laboratory or expert panel has classified this variant as pathogenic. PP5 requires a classification from a source with supporting-level credibility (ClinVar 1-star submitter or higher). |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency observed is 5.01×10⁻⁵ (0.005%, East Asian gnomAD v2.1), well below the 1% BA1 threshold for a stand-alone benign classification. |
gnomad_v2
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency is 0.005% (gnomAD v2.1 East Asian), below the 0.3% BS1 threshold for a strong benign criterion. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | Only 2–3 alleles have been observed in gnomAD across all populations (total alleles surveyed: 282,762 in v2.1 and 1,614,058 in v4.1). This is insufficient observation in healthy adults to meet BS2, which requires the variant to be observed in multiple healthy individuals in a manner consistent with benign impact. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies have been identified that demonstrate no damaging effect for this variant. OncoKB lists 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' and no variant-specific functional data. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation or non-segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | ESR1 is not a gene where predominantly truncating variants are established as the sole cause of germline disease. The PVS1 gene context identifies literature supporting LOF mechanism but no well-characterized germline syndrome where missense variants can be dismissed via BP1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder, or in cis with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder, has been reported. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Skipped: variant is a substitution, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | In silico evidence is mixed and does not reach the consensus required for BP4. BayesDel predicts benign (−0.538) and SpliceAI shows no splicing impact (max delta 0.0), but REVEL (0.213) is indeterminate. The evidence does not meet the 'multiple lines of computational evidence suggesting no impact' standard. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No case has been identified in which this variant is present in a patient with an alternate molecular basis for disease (i.e., a co-occurring pathogenic variant explaining the phenotype). |
|
| BP6 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has classified it as benign. BP6 requires a classification from a source with supporting-level credibility. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splicing impact. This variant is missense (p.Ser554Asn), not synonymous. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.