LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002067.5:c.892C>T
GNA11
· NP_002058.2:p.(Pro298Ser)
· NM_002067.5
GRCh37: chr19:3120989 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr19:3120991 C>T
Gene:
GNA11
Transcript:
NM_002067.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
Variant details
Gene
GNA11
Transcript
NM_002067.5
Protein
NP_002058.2:p.(Pro298Ser)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_002067.5:c.892C>T (p.Pro298Ser) in GNA11 is a missense variant absent from gnomAD population databases (PM2).
2
The variant has been observed in COSMIC (COSV50138421, n=3) in somatic cancers but is absent from ClinVar with no germline classification available.
3
In silico predictors are conflicting: REVEL score 0.535 is borderline damaging while BayesDel score -0.247 is benign; SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00). Neither PP3 nor BP4 is met.
4
No functional studies, segregation data, de novo reports, or phenotype-specific evidence were identified for this variant.
5
With only PM2 (moderate) met and no supporting pathogenic or benign criteria, the variant does not meet any ACMG/AMP classification combination and defaults to Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense variant (p.Pro298Ser); does not fall into PVS1 null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) does not apply to missense substitutions. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant at amino acid position 298 has been identified. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no same-residue comparator with an established pathogenic classification was found. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo data available for this variant. No publications with de novo confirmation of NM_002067.5:c.892C>T were identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect for P298S. No publications with experimental functional data for NM_002067.5:c.892C>T were found in the case materials. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or prevalence data available. The variant has been observed in COSMIC (somatic, n=3) but no germline case data with statistical comparison to controls was identified. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No alternate source has classified this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no diagnostic laboratory classification was found. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Position 298 is not a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. No domain-level functional evidence specific to the Pro298 residue was identified in the case materials. GNA11 has well-characterized gain-of-function hotspots at R183 and Q209, but P298 is not among the established critical residues. |
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_002067.5:c.892C>T is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (allele frequency = 0%). Meets PM2 threshold (<0.1% in population databases) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue pathogenic comparator variant identified. PM5 candidate harvesting returned no candidates at Pro298 with an established pathogenic classification. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo data available for NM_002067.5:c.892C>T. No publications reporting de novo occurrence were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data available. No family studies or pedigrees with this variant were identified. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior data not available for GNA11 (gene not supported by the predictor). Missense constraint (z-score) cannot be assessed without this metric. Gene-level missense tolerance data is unavailable in the case materials. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictors are conflicting: REVEL 0.535 (borderline damaging, just above 0.5 threshold), BayesDel -0.247 (benign), SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splicing impact). Multiple lines of computational evidence do not consistently support a deleterious effect; the conflicting data does not satisfy PP3 requirements. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype data available to assess whether the clinical presentation is specific for a GNA11-related disorder. No case-level phenotypic information was provided. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | Absent from ClinVar. No 3-star expert panel or other reputable source has classified NM_002067.5:c.892C>T as pathogenic. PP5 default supporting strength cannot be applied without a ClinVar entry meeting the review status threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD (v2.1, v4.1, Canada), well below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD, below the BS1 threshold of >0.3% for non-VCEP assessment. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | Variant is absent from population databases; cannot confirm observation in healthy adults. No case-level data showing co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant or presence in an unaffected individual was identified. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect were identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect. No publications with experimental data showing benign functional impact for this variant were found. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data available. No family studies showing lack of segregation with disease were identified. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | GNA11 has established gain-of-function missense mutations (e.g., Q209, R183) causing constitutive activation in somatic disease and missense variants associated with germline vascular malformations. It cannot be concluded that only truncating variants cause GNA11-related disease; missense variants are a recognized disease mechanism. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No data on trans configuration with a known pathogenic variant. No case-level genotyping data was available to assess allelic phase. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | In silico evidence is conflicting: REVEL 0.535 is borderline damaging (>0.5 threshold), while BayesDel -0.247 is confidently benign (<0). Multiple lines of computational evidence do not consistently suggest no impact on the gene product, so BP4 is not met. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternate molecular basis identified. No case-level data showing a different causal variant in the proband was available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | Absent from ClinVar. No 3-star expert panel or other reputable source has classified NM_002067.5:c.892C>T as benign. BP6 default supporting benign strength cannot be applied without a ClinVar entry. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Missense variant; BP7 is reserved for synonymous variants with no predicted splicing impact. NM_002067.5:c.892C>T is a missense substitution (p.Pro298Ser). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.