LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004380.2:c.3215C>G
CREBBP
· NP_004371.2:p.(Ser1072Cys)
· NM_004380.2
GRCh37: chr16:3817756 G>C
·
GRCh38: chr16:3767755 G>C
Gene:
CREBBP
Transcript:
NM_004380.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
CREBBP
Transcript
NM_004380.2
Protein
NP_004371.2:p.(Ser1072Cys)
gnomAD AF
6.194796618632214e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_004380.2:c.3215C>G (p.Ser1072Cys) is a missense variant in CREBBP. It is absent from ClinVar and absent from gnomAD v2.1, with a single heterozygous observation in gnomAD v4.1 at extremely low frequency (AF=6.19×10⁻⁷, 1/1,614,258).
2
This low population frequency meets PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple computational predictors support a benign impact: REVEL score 0.046 (benign-leaning), BayesDel score -0.448 (predicted benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splice alteration (max Δ=0.00). This meets BP4 at supporting benign strength.
4
No variant-specific functional data, de novo observations, segregation data, or published case reports are available. No same-codon pathogenic comparators exist for PM5 or PS1. The variant is not in a mutational hotspot or characterized functional domain.
5
The variant does not qualify for PVS1 (missense, not a null variant). BP1 does not apply because missense variants are an established disease mechanism in CREBBP.
6
With one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), the evidence is balanced and insufficient for classification as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, likely benign, or benign. This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.3215C>G, p.Ser1072Cys), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) does not apply to missense variants. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No different nucleotide change at codon 1072 has been classified as pathogenic in ClinVar or published literature. The variant is absent from ClinVar entirely. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No publications or ClinVar submissions describe a de novo occurrence. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional data exists. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no curated functional evidence for this variant. No publications describe experimental characterization of p.Ser1072Cys or a systematically characterized range that includes residue 1072. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No variant prevalence data in affected individuals versus controls. The variant is absent from ClinVar and has not been reported in any published case series or cohorts. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | No same amino acid change (p.Ser1072Cys) resulting from a different nucleotide substitution has been classified as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar entirely. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 1072 is not in a statistically significant mutational hotspot (cancerhotspots.org: not significant). It lies in an inter-domain region between the KIX domain (~586-672) and the bromodomain (~1103-1175) and is not within a well-characterized functional domain with domain-level variant enrichment data. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes) and present at an extremely low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (AF=6.19×10⁻⁷, 1/1,614,258 alleles, 0 homozygotes), well below the PM2 threshold of 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not met | No different pathogenic missense variant at codon 1072 has been identified. Automated PM5 candidate harvesting returned zero candidates at this residue. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No publications or ClinVar submissions describe a de novo occurrence of c.3215C>G. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data is available for this variant. It has not been reported in any families or cosegregation studies. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | While missense variants are a known disease mechanism in CREBBP, PP2 requires demonstrating a low rate of benign missense variation (e.g., via gnomAD missense Z-score or constraint metrics), which was not available in the case evidence. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico predictors support a benign impact: REVEL score 0.046 (below pathogenic threshold), BayesDel score -0.448 (predicted benign), SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splice impact). Computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data is available for this adjudication. PP4 requires a phenotype highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source or expert panel has classified this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency is 0.00133% (African/African American, gnomAD v4.1), well below the BA1 threshold of 1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest population allele frequency is 0.00133% (African/African American, gnomAD v4.1), well below the BS1 threshold of 0.3% for a dominant disorder. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | A single allele was observed in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1,614,258), but this does not constitute confirmed observation in a healthy adult individual for a fully penetrant dominant disorder. The health status of the gnomAD individual is unknown. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect for this variant. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect with no curated functional evidence. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data is available for this variant. Lack of segregation in affected family members cannot be assessed. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | Missense variants are a known disease mechanism in CREBBP. Among reported CREBBP RSTS variants, 24% are missense, indicating that missense variants are not an unexpected finding and BP1 does not apply. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant (for a dominant disorder) or in cis with a pathogenic variant (for a recessive disorder) is available. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence support a benign impact: REVEL score 0.046 (well below pathogenic thresholds), BayesDel score -0.448 (predicted benign), and SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splice alteration predicted). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternative molecular basis for disease has been identified in a case carrying this variant. No case-level diagnostic data is available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | The variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source or expert panel has classified this variant as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.3215C>G, p.Ser1072Cys), not a synonymous (silent) variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.