LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G
BARD1
· NP_000456.2:p.(Asn470Ser)
· NM_000465.4
GRCh37: chr2:215632365 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr2:214767641 T>C
Gene:
BARD1
Transcript:
NM_000465.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BARD1
Transcript
NM_000465.4
Protein
NP_000456.2:p.(Asn470Ser)
gnomAD AF
8.798791467402956e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser) is a missense variant in exon 6 of BARD1.
2
This variant is present at extremely low frequency in gnomAD (v2.1: AF = 0.0113%, 32/282,604 alleles; v4.1: AF = 0.0088%, 142/1,613,858 alleles; 0 homozygotes), meeting PM2 at supporting level.
3
Multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.17, BayesDel score -0.585, and SpliceAI delta score 0.00, meeting BP4 at supporting level.
4
The variant was reported as a putative germline mutation in 1 of 60 Japanese familial breast cancer patients and absent from 152 controls (Ishitobi et al., 2003), but this single observation is insufficient for PS4.
5
No variant-specific functional data exist; the functional study by Toh et al. (2019) characterized BARD1 germline variants but did not include N470S.
6
BARD1 is a recognized hereditary breast cancer susceptibility gene with a loss-of-function disease mechanism, consistent with tumor suppressor biology.
7
In ClinVar, this variant is classified as Uncertain significance (review status: criteria provided, single submitter). Multiple clinical laboratories have submitted conflicting classifications: 8 laboratories as VUS, 5 as Likely benign, and 1 as Benign.
8
The variant lies within the ankyrin repeat domain, a characterized protein-protein interaction domain, but the residue is not within a statistically significant mutational hotspot.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser) is a missense variant in exon 6 of BARD1. It does not fall into the default generic PVS1 null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). Generic PVS1 framework is not applicable for this variant type. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No prior report of a different nucleotide change at codon 470 resulting in the same amino acid substitution (p.Asn470Ser) that has been classified as pathogenic. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional data exist for NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser). The functional study by Toh et al. (PMID:31371347) characterized other BARD1 germline variants but did not include N470S. The variant was listed in a pediatric oncology cohort table in PMID:36187937 but was not functionally tested. |
PMID:31371347
PMID:36187937
|
| PS4 | Not met | The variant was observed in 1 of 60 familial breast cancer patients and absent from 152 controls (PMID:14550946), but this single observation does not provide statistically significant enrichment. No case-control study with sufficient power has been conducted. |
PMID:14550946
|
| PS5 | Not met | This variant is not established as pathogenic by any reputable source. The ClinVar aggregate classification is Uncertain significance with a single-submitter review status. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant (p.Asn470Ser) lies within the ankyrin repeat domain of BARD1 (residues ~420-555), a characterized functional domain mediating protein-protein interactions. However, the residue is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot (cancerhotspots.org: residue not significant), and no cluster of pathogenic missense variants has been established specifically within the ankyrin repeat domain of BARD1. The ankyrin repeat domain crystal structure (PMID:18480049) confirms it is a structured domain, but domain-level characterization alone is insufficient for PM1 without evidence of pathogenic missense enrichment. |
PMID:16633366
PMID:18480049
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at extremely low frequency in population databases. In gnomAD v2.1, it is observed in 32 of 282,604 alleles (AF = 0.0113%; 0 homozygotes). In gnomAD v4.1, it is observed in 142 of 1,613,858 alleles (AF = 0.0088%; 0 homozygotes). The highest subpopulation frequency is in the European (Finnish) population at 0.0478% (v2.1). All frequencies are below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 under generic ACMG criteria. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:19584272
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variant at the same codon (Asn470) was identified in ClinVar. The PM5 candidate harvest did not identify any same-residue pathogenic comparators. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data are available. The proband reported in PMID:14550946 had affected family members (mother and maternal aunt with breast cancer), but DNA from other family members was unavailable, preventing segregation analysis. |
PMID:14550946
|
| PP2 | Not met | No gene-level constraint data (e.g., Missense Z-score, gnomAD constraint metrics) are available in the evidence summary to assess whether BARD1 has a low rate of benign missense variation. BARD1 is a known tumor suppressor, but PP2 requires quantitative evidence of missense constraint. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | All in silico tools predict a benign effect. REVEL score is 0.17 (below the typical 0.3-0.5 pathogenic threshold), BayesDel score is -0.585 (negative, consistent with benign), and SpliceAI delta score is 0.0 (no splicing impact). Multiple lines of computational evidence support no deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | Insufficient clinical phenotype data are available to determine whether the patient's presentation is highly specific for BARD1-related disease. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar aggregate classification is Uncertain significance (review status: criteria provided, single submitter; 1-star). No 3-star expert panel has classified this variant. Under the established rules, PP5 requires a 3-star expert panel for supporting-level application. Additionally, 6 of 17 submissions classify the variant as Likely benign or Benign. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The allele frequency in gnomAD is 0.0113% (v2.1) and 0.0088% (v4.1), both far below the 1% threshold for BA1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The allele frequency in gnomAD is 0.0113% (v2.1) and 0.0088% (v4.1), below the 0.3% threshold for BS1. The highest subpopulation frequency is 0.0478% (Finnish, v2.1), still well below 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No data are available on observation of this variant in a healthy adult at an age when full penetrance of BARD1-related disease would be expected. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies have demonstrated that NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G (p.Asn470Ser) has no deleterious effect. The only functional study of BARD1 germline variants (PMID:31371347) did not include N470S among the variants tested. |
PMID:31371347
|
| BS4 | Not met | No non-segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where the primary disease mechanism involves truncating variants. BARD1-associated disease involves both truncating and missense pathogenic variants (e.g., RING domain missense variants that disrupt BRCA1 binding), so BARD1 is not a gene where only truncating variants cause disease. |
PMID:16633366
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic BARD1 variant has been reported. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict a benign effect for this variant. REVEL score is 0.17 (well below pathogenic thresholds), BayesDel score is -0.585 (consistent with benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score = 0.00). The concordance of multiple in silico predictors supports a lack of functional impact. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified in a case harboring this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | Although 6 of 17 ClinVar submissions classify this variant as Likely benign (n=5) or Benign (n=1), the aggregate ClinVar classification remains Uncertain significance with a 1-star review status. Under the established rules, BP6 requires a 3-star expert panel classification for application at supporting level. No expert panel has reviewed this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | NM_000465.4:c.1409A>G is a missense variant resulting in p.Asn470Ser. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions; this is a single nucleotide substitution. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders where a variant is detected in trans with a pathogenic variant; BARD1-related disease is autosomal dominant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to non-frameshift insertions/deletions or stop-loss variants; this is a single nucleotide substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.