LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006445.3:c.4775A>C
PRPF8
· NP_006436.3:p.(Asp1592Ala)
· NM_006445.3
GRCh37: chr17:1563736 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr17:1660442 T>G
Gene:
PRPF8
Transcript:
NM_006445.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PRPF8
Transcript
NM_006445.3
Protein
NP_006436.3:p.(Asp1592Ala)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_006445.3:c.4775A>C (p.Asp1592Ala) in PRPF8 is a missense variant absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 population databases, meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
In silico analysis with REVEL (score: 0.909) predicts a pathogenic effect, meeting PP3 at supporting strength.
3
The variant is absent from ClinVar, COSMIC, and cancerhotspots.org, and no published literature mentions this specific variant.
4
No functional data, de novo observations, segregation data, or clinical case reports exist for this variant, leaving PVS1, PS1-PS5, PM1, PM5-PM6, PP1-PP2, PP4-PP5, and all benign criteria not met or not applicable.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense variant p.(Asp1592Ala); PVS1 requires null variants (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice ±1,2). Per ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798), this variant does not qualify for any PVS1 strength level. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No established pathogenic variant at the same amino acid position (p.Asp1592) with a different nucleotide change. This variant is entirely absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation of this variant. One de novo PRPF8 variant reported at a different position (c.5548C>T, p.Arg1850*) is not relevant to this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional data exists for this variant. No experimental studies in literature, COSMIC, or OncoKB. No systematically characterized range encompassing p.Asp1592. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or clinical cohort data available. Variant is absent from ClinVar and has no published clinical observations. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | No different pathogenic missense variant identified at codon 1592 in ClinVar or literature. PS5 requires an established pathogenic variant at the same residue with a different amino acid change. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Variant p.Asp1592 is not located in a statistically significant hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. No evidence from literature that this residue lies within a well-characterized critical functional domain with established pathogenic enrichment. |
|
| PM2 | Met | Absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 population databases, meeting the PM2 threshold of <0.1% allele frequency. The variant has not been observed in large population cohorts. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No same-residue comparator variant (p.Asp1592) classified as pathogenic identified in ClinVar. Automated PM5 candidate search returned no candidates. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation of this specific variant. While a de novo PRPF8 variant has been reported (PMID:38976971, c.5548C>T p.Arg1850*), it is at a different position and provides no evidence for NM_006445.3:c.4775A>C. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No cosegregation data available. No family studies or linkage analysis for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | PP2 requires a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common disease mechanism. Without gnomAD constraint metrics (Z-score) for PRPF8 missense variation in the evidence, PP2 cannot be confidently applied. REVEL score of 0.909 suggests deleterious effect but does not substitute for gene-level missense constraint data. |
|
| PP3 | Met | REVEL score of 0.909 predicts a pathogenic effect. Multiple in silico tools support a deleterious impact of this missense substitution. SpliceAI max delta 0.02 indicates no splicing effect, consistent with a missense mechanism. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or clinical data specific to this variant. The variant has not been observed in any clinical cohort. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | Variant is absent from ClinVar. PP5 requires a reputable source (e.g., ClinVar expert panel) to have classified this variant as pathogenic. No classification exists to evaluate. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Absent from gnomAD. BA1 requires allele frequency >1% in any population. The variant has zero observations across all population databases. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Absent from gnomAD. BS1 requires allele frequency >0.3% in population databases. The variant has zero observations. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No observation in healthy adults. The variant is absent from all population databases with no evidence of occurrence in trans with a pathogenic variant or in controls. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrate no deleterious effect for this variant. No functional data of any kind exists for p.Asp1592Ala. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data available to demonstrate lack of cosegregation with disease. No family studies exist for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | PRPF8 has documented pathogenic missense variants in addition to truncating variants (e.g., p.Tyr2334Asn associated with retinitis pigmentosa). BP1 requires the gene to be associated primarily with truncating variants causing disease. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic PRPF8 variant. Variant absent from all population and clinical databases. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | REVEL score of 0.909 strongly predicts a deleterious effect. BP4 requires multiple lines of computational evidence suggesting no impact on the gene product, which is contradicted by the high REVEL score. |
revel
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not met | No cases identified where this variant was found in an individual with an alternate molecular basis for disease. No clinical case data exists. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | Variant is absent from ClinVar. BP6 requires a reputable source to have classified this variant as benign. No classification exists. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not a synonymous (silent) variant. BP7 is specific to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. NM_006445.3:c.4775A>C is a missense substitution p.(Asp1592Ala). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.