LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000314.8:c.203A>G
PTEN
· NP_000305.3:p.(Tyr68Cys)
· NM_000314.8
GRCh37: chr10:89685308 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr10:87925551 A>G
Gene:
PTEN
Transcript:
NM_000314.8
Final call
VUS
PS3 moderate
PM2 supporting
PP2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Protein
NP_000305.3:p.(Tyr68Cys)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3_Moderate is met: Y68C has a cumulative fitness score of -2.73 in the Mighell et al. 2018 PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase activity assay (Table S2 of PMID 29706350), meeting the PTEN VCEP threshold of ≤ -1.11 for PS3_Moderate.
2
PM2_Supporting is met: NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, meeting the PTEN VCEP threshold of < 0.00001 (0.001%) allele frequency.
3
PP2_Supporting is met: PTEN has a low rate of benign missense variation and missense variants are a well-established common mechanism of disease in PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome.
4
PP3_Supporting is met: REVEL score of 0.985 exceeds the PTEN VCEP threshold of > 0.7 for missense variants.
5
No benign criteria are met. The variant is absent from population databases, functional data demonstrates a damaging effect, and computational predictions support pathogenicity.
6
Classification: VUS (Variant of Uncertain Significance). The variant has 1 moderate criterion (PS3_Moderate) and 3 supporting criteria (PM2_Supporting, PP2_Supporting, PP3_Supporting). This combination (1M + 3Spt) does not meet any PTEN VCEP Likely Pathogenic rule (Rule13 requires ≥3M; Rule14 requires 2M + ≥2Spt; others require ≥1 Strong). Under both the PTEN VCEP and generic ACMG/AMP 2015 classification frameworks, this combination falls into the VUS category.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PTEN Version 3.2 v3.2 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is a missense variant (p.Tyr68Cys). The PTEN VCEP PVS1 decision tree applies only to null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1,2 splice site disruptions, and exon-level CNVs). Missense substitutions are outside the scope of PVS1. |
|
| PS1 | Not met | PS1 requires a different nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid as a previously established pathogenic variant, or a variant at the same nucleotide position as a known pathogenic splicing variant. c.203A>G is the only nucleotide change that produces p.Tyr68Cys (TAC→TGC), and the variant is a missense, not a splicing variant. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation identified in the reviewed literature. The only case report with detailed pedigree (PMID: 26246517) describes an inherited variant — the proband's father also carries c.203A>G and has macrocephaly. No confirmed or assumed de novo evidence exists for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Met | Y68C has a cumulative fitness score (Cum_score) of -2.73 in the Mighell et al. 2018 (PMID: 29706350) PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase activity assay (Table S2), meeting the VCEP PS3_Moderate threshold of ≤ -1.11. The measurement is high-confidence (High_conf=True, Pass SE Filter). This represents systematic functional characterization of all possible missense variants at position 68 via massively parallel assay. |
vcep_mmc2
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Insufficient proband-level data with specificity scores to apply PS4 per PTEN VCEP rules. The variant is reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic by 6 clinical laboratories and Likely Pathogenic by 1, and has been observed in CS patients (PMID: 19457929, PMID: 26246517), but individual proband specificity scores required by the VCEP PS4 framework (≥16 for Very Strong, 4-15.5 for Strong, 2-3.5 for Moderate, 1-1.5 for Supporting) could not be computed from available data. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not defined in the PTEN VCEP criteria set (ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel Specifications Version 3.2). |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The PTEN VCEP defines PM1 as applicable to residues in the catalytic motifs: 90-94, 123-130, and 166-168 (NP_000305.3). p.Tyr68Cys is at position 68, which lies within the ATP-binding motif (residues 60-73) but outside the VCEP-specified catalytic motif ranges. Although residue 68 is in a statistically significant cancer hotspot per cancerhotspots.org, the VCEP definition explicitly limits PM1 to the named catalytic residues. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0. This meets the PTEN VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of allele frequency < 0.00001 (0.001%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | PM5 requires a different missense change at the same amino acid residue previously determined to be pathogenic or likely pathogenic. At codon 68, p.Tyr68Asp (Y68D, PMID: 16704655) and p.Tyr68His (Y68H, PMID: 9600246) have been reported, but neither has been confirmed with P/LP classification in ClinVar through the available data. Additionally, BLOSUM62 comparison could not be performed. Without verified P/LP comparator at the same residue, PM5 cannot be applied. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation identified. The one case with parental data (PMID: 26246517) shows inheritance from the father. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | Insufficient segregation data. PMID 26246517 reports one affected parent-child pair (father with macrocephaly), providing at most 1 meiosis. The PTEN VCEP requires ≥3 meioses for PP1_Supporting, ≥5 for Moderate, and ≥7 across ≥2 families for Strong. |
|
| PP2 | Met | PTEN is a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation (high missense constraint) and missense variants are a well-established common mechanism of disease in Cowden syndrome and related PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes. NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is a missense variant meeting the PTEN VCEP PP2_Supporting criteria. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | REVEL score of 0.985 exceeds the PTEN VCEP PP3_Supporting threshold of >0.7 for missense variants. BayesDel score of 0.594 provides additional supporting computational evidence, though the VCEP rule specifies REVEL for missense variants. |
revel
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is designated as Not Applicable by the PTEN VCEP. Phenotype specificity has been incorporated into the PS4 rule specifications instead. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is designated as Not Applicable by the PTEN VCEP. ClinVar review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (not 3-star expert panel), so even the PP5 override policy would not apply. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from all gnomAD populations. The PTEN VCEP BA1 threshold is filtering allele frequency > 0.00056 (0.056%). Zero allele count does not meet this threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD. The PTEN VCEP BS1 threshold is allele frequency ≥ 0.000043 (0.0043%) for strong and ≥ 0.0000043 (0.00043%) for supporting. Zero allele count does not meet either threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygous observations of c.203A>G in any population database or published report. The PTEN VCEP BS2 requires observation in the homozygous state in a healthy or PHTS-unaffected individual. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | Functional data from Mighell et al. 2018 saturation mutagenesis (mmc2.xlsx) shows Y68C has a damaging effect on phosphatase activity (Cum_score = -2.73). The PTEN VCEP BS3 requires functional studies showing no damaging effect. The available evidence demonstrates the opposite — a deleterious functional consequence. |
vcep_mmc2
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data demonstrating lack of segregation in affected family members. PMID 26246517 shows co-occurrence of variant and phenotype (macrocephaly) in both proband and father, which is consistent with segregation, not lack thereof. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is designated as Not Applicable by the PTEN VCEP. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No evidence of the variant observed in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant, nor ≥3 observations in cis/phase unknown with different P/LP PTEN variants. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | The PTEN VCEP BP4 rule for missense variants requires REVEL score < 0.5. The REVEL score for c.203A>G is 0.985, strongly predicting a deleterious effect rather than no impact. SpliceAI shows no splicing impact (max delta = 0.01), but the REVEL criterion for missense variants is not met. |
revel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No evidence that this variant has been found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease meeting the PTEN VCEP BP5 criteria (other gene/disorder must be highly penetrant, and the patient's personal/family history must show no overlap between the other gene disorder and PTEN). |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is designated as Not Applicable by the PTEN VCEP. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) or intronic variants at or beyond +7/-21 with no predicted splice impact. NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is a missense variant (p.Tyr68Cys) and does not meet the variant type criteria for BP7. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions without a known function. NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 applies to recessive disorders where the variant is detected in trans with a pathogenic variant. PTEN-associated disorders are autosomal dominant, and PM3 is designated Not Applicable by the PTEN VCEP. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in non-repeat regions or stop-loss variants. NM_000314.8:c.203A>G is a single-nucleotide missense substitution, not an in-frame indel or stop-loss variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.