LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_133509.4:c.428C>T
RAD51B
· NP_598193.2:p.(Thr143Ile)
· NM_133509.4
GRCh37: chr14:68331832 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr14:67865115 C>T
Gene:
RAD51B
Transcript:
NM_133509.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
Variant details
Gene
RAD51B
Transcript
NM_133509.4
Protein
NP_598193.2:p.(Thr143Ile)
gnomAD AF
3.931872507473678e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
RAD51B c.428C>T (p.Thr143Ile) is observed at very low frequency in population databases (gnomAD v2.1: AF=0.0091%, 25/274,618 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.0039%, 63/1,602,290 alleles; no homozygotes), meeting PM2 at moderate strength.
2
This is a missense variant and does not qualify for PVS1 under the ClinGen SVI framework (PMC6185798), as it is not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice site variant.
3
No variant-specific functional data, case-control studies, de novo observations, co-segregation data, or same-residue comparator variants were identified. In silico predictions are conflicting (REVEL 0.603, BayesDel 0.189, SpliceAI 0.01) and do not meet PP3 or BP4 thresholds.
4
ClinVar reports this variant as Uncertain significance (1★, single submitter: Ambry Genetics). No 3★ expert panel classification exists to support PP5 or BP6.
5
With only PM2 (moderate) met and all other criteria not met or not applicable, there is insufficient evidence to classify this variant beyond Uncertain Significance under ACMG/AMP 2015 rules (PMID:25741868). This is consistent with the ClinVar classification.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This missense variant (p.Thr143Ile) does not fall into the ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus). The generic PVS1 framework (PMC6185798) does not apply to missense substitutions. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No alternative nucleotide change at codon 143 producing the same amino acid substitution (Thr143Ile) was identified as pathogenic in ClinVar or the literature. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation with confirmed parentage reported for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional data identified. OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect with no cited PMIDs, COSMIC records one somatic occurrence (COSV108918756) but somatic presence alone does not constitute functional evidence for germline PS3. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | The variant has been observed in general population databases (gnomAD, 25–63 alleles) without case-control comparison showing enrichment in affected individuals. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PS5 | Not met | No reputable source has recently reported this variant as pathogenic with inaccessible evidence. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 143 does not fall within a statistically significant cancer hotspot (cancerhotspots.org) and no gene-specific literature establishes this position as a critical functional domain enriched for pathogenic missense variants. The nearby Walker A motif (residues ~128–135) is upstream; position 143 is outside the characterized ATP-binding domain. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present in gnomAD at very low frequency (v2.1: AF=0.0091%, 25/274,618 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.0039%, 63/1,602,290 alleles; highest subpopulation AF=0.062% in South Asian, v2.1), well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 in non-VCEP context. No homozygotes observed. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense comparator variant at the same codon (position 143) was identified in ClinVar. Automated PM5 candidate search returned no candidates. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation reported for this variant (with or without confirmed parentage). |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | Insufficient evidence that RAD51B has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense is a common mechanism of disease. RAD51B is a large gene where both truncating and missense variants occur; gene-level constraint data were not assessed in this evaluation. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictions show conflicting results: REVEL score of 0.603 is moderately above the damaging threshold (0.5), but BayesDel score of 0.189 falls in the benign range (<0.27), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.01). Multiple lines of computational evidence do not consistently support a deleterious effect, and therefore PP3 is not met. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No proband phenotype or family history data are available to assess specificity for a RAD51B-associated disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain significance (1★, criteria provided, single submitter). PP5 requires a reputable source reporting the variant as pathogenic, and per global rule the ClinVar expert panel must be 3★ to qualify at supporting strength. Neither condition is met. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Maximum population allele frequency (0.062% South Asian, gnomAD v2.1) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Maximum population allele frequency (0.062% South Asian, gnomAD v2.1) is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No evidence that this variant has been observed in healthy adult individuals in a context permitting BS2 application (e.g., homozygous state or comprehensive healthy cohort data). |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect of this variant on protein function or splicing. |
spliceai
|
| BS4 | Not met | No family segregation data available to demonstrate lack of co-segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | RAD51B is a homologous recombination repair gene where both truncating and missense variants are reported in the literature. While germline truncating variants have been described (PMID:25600502), there is insufficient evidence that RAD51B disease is primarily mediated by truncating variants to apply BP1 to this missense change. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not met | No evidence that this variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in RAD51B or another gene for a fully penetrant dominant disorder. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | In-frame indels only; this is a substitution variant. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not consistently support a benign effect. While BayesDel (0.189) falls in the benign range and SpliceAI (0.01) predicts no splicing impact, REVEL (0.603) predicts a damaging effect. Conflicting in silico predictions preclude application of BP4. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified in an individual carrying this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain significance (1★), not benign or likely benign. BP6 requires a reputable source reporting the variant as benign, and per global rule the ClinVar submission must be 3★ expert panel to qualify. Neither condition is met. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Synonymous variants only; this is a missense substitution (c.428C>T, p.Thr143Ile). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.