LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A
ESR1
· NP_001116212.1:p.(Pro324Thr)
· NM_001122740.1
GRCh37: chr6:152265517 C>A
·
GRCh38: chr6:151944382 C>A
Gene:
ESR1
Transcript:
NM_001122740.1
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ESR1
Transcript
NM_001122740.1
Protein
NP_001116212.1:p.(Pro324Thr)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) is a missense variant in exon 5 of ESR1.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD population databases (v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.844 (damaging) and BayesDel noAF score 0.302 (above the -0.36 damaging threshold), meeting PP3 at supporting strength.
4
No ClinVar entries exist for this variant; no functional studies, segregation data, or case-control data are available.
5
PVS1 is not applicable: this is a missense variant that does not meet null-variant criteria per PMC6185798.
6
With only two supporting pathogenic criteria (PM2, PP3) and no benign criteria met, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution (c.970C>A, p.Pro324Thr) and does not fall into the ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No known pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change (Pro324Thr) via a different nucleotide substitution has been identified in ClinVar or the literature. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation with confirmed paternity and maternity is available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional studies directly testing NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) or a systematically characterized range including residue 324 were identified. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect. Computational prediction alone (REVEL 0.844) does not satisfy PS3 experimental evidence requirements. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected individuals to controls is available for this variant. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No alternate pathogenic variant at the same residue (Pro324) has been identified in ClinVar or the literature to support PS5. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue Pro324 is not located in a statistically significant cancer hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. Although ESR1 position 324 lies within the ligand-binding domain (aa 302–552), no domain-level functional evidence was identified in the case materials to support PM1 application per generic ACMG 2015 criteria. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases (v2.1 exomes, v4.1 exomes, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 genomes), meeting the PM2 threshold of <0.1% allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not met | No pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid residue (Pro324) was identified for comparison. Automated PM5 candidate harvesting returned zero candidates. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation (without confirmation of paternity and maternity) is available for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data with disease in multiple affected family members is available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | Insufficient data to establish that ESR1 has a low rate of benign missense variation with missense variants as a common disease mechanism. gnomAD missense constraint metrics (Z-score) are not available in the case materials. |
|
| PP3 | Met | Multiple lines of in silico computational evidence support a deleterious effect. REVEL score of 0.844 falls well above the damaging threshold (>0.5). BayesDel noAF score of 0.302 is above the -0.36 damaging threshold, providing additional in silico support. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data specific to the disease gene was provided for assessment. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | This variant is absent from ClinVar and no reputable source (including 3-star expert panel) has classified it as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases; allele frequency of 0% does not exceed the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all gnomAD population databases; allele frequency of 0% does not exceed the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No data on homozygous or hemizygous observations of this variant in healthy adults are available. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No functional studies demonstrating a neutral or benign effect for NM_001122740.1:c.970C>A (p.Pro324Thr) were identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data in affected family members demonstrating lack of co-segregation with disease is available. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | ESR1 is not a gene where only truncating variants cause disease. Published evidence (PMID:41129222) suggests rare regulatory and potentially coding alleles of ESR1 may contribute to inherited breast cancer predisposition, indicating missense variants may be disease-relevant. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No data on observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic dominant variant are available. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a benign impact. REVEL score of 0.844 and BayesDel score of 0.302 both predict a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00) but this alone does not outweigh the damaging missense predictions. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No data demonstrating that this variant is consistently absent in individuals with ESR1-related disease are available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | This variant is absent from ClinVar and no reputable source (including 3-star expert panel) has classified it as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution (c.970C>A, p.Pro324Thr), not a synonymous variant; BP7 applies exclusively to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.