LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000075.4:c.719G>C
CDK4
· NP_000066.1:p.(Arg240Pro)
· NM_000075.4
GRCh37: chr12:58143065 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr12:57749282 C>G
Gene:
CDK4
Transcript:
NM_000075.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
CDK4
Transcript
NM_000075.4
Protein
NP_000066.1:p.(Arg240Pro)
gnomAD AF
2.4780107520886533e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_000075.4:c.719G>C (p.Arg240Pro) is a missense variant in CDK4 exon 7, currently classified as Uncertain significance by five clinical laboratories in ClinVar (Variation ID: 495534).
2
This variant is extremely rare in population databases, observed in 2 of 251,364 alleles (AF=0.0008%) in gnomAD v2.1 and 4 of 1,614,198 alleles (AF=0.00025%) in gnomAD v4.1, with no homozygotes, meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.097, BayesDel score -0.331, and SpliceAI max delta 0.02, meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
4
No variant-specific functional data, de novo observations, case-control data, or segregation data were identified to support other pathogenic or benign criteria.
5
The variant is in the CDK4 protein kinase domain at residue Arg240, but no statistically significant hotspot or domain-level PM1 specification was found in the current evidence.
6
Overall, the evidence for pathogenicity (PM2_supporting) is balanced by evidence for a benign effect (BP4_supporting), yielding a classification of Uncertain significance under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 framework.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_000075.4:c.719G>C is a missense variant (p.Arg240Pro) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice site variants). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No alternative nucleotide change at the same codon producing the same amino acid change (p.Arg240Pro) has been reported as pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data is available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional data is available. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect; no experimental studies of NM_000075.4:c.719G>C (p.Arg240Pro) were identified in the literature reviewed. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or cohort data demonstrating enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls is available. ClinVar submissions are all VUS with no phenotype enrichment data. |
clinvar
|
| PS5 | Not met | The variant has not been reported as a definitive disease-causing mutation in a reputable source; ClinVar reports it as Uncertain significance by all submitters. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue Arg240 is within the CDK4 protein kinase domain, but the residue is not identified as a statistically significant hotspot (cancerhotspots.org), and no VCEP/CSPEC domain specification or critical-domain literature citation is present in the case materials to support PM1 application. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent or extremely rare in large population databases. In gnomAD v2.1, it is observed in 2/251,364 alleles (AF=0.0008%), and in gnomAD v4.1 in 4/1,614,198 alleles (AF=0.00025%), with no homozygotes in either dataset. Both frequencies are well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 candidate harvesting was unable to confirm classic same-residue comparator variants; no same-position pathogenic missense comparators were identified. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation is reported for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data with the disease phenotype is available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | No gene-level missense constraint metric (Z-score, missense depletion ratio) is available in the case materials to assess whether CDK4 has a low rate of benign missense variation. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico predictors support a benign effect: REVEL score is 0.097 (well below pathogenicity threshold of ~0.5), BayesDel score is -0.331 (negative, favoring benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.02). These data support BP4 rather than PP3. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No case-specific phenotype or family history data is available to assess whether the patient's presentation is highly specific for CDK4-related disease. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as Uncertain significance with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). Under the global PP5 rule, supporting strength requires a 3-star expert panel review classification of pathogenic/likely pathogenic, which is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant allele frequency in gnomAD (v2.1: 0.0008%, v4.1: 0.00025%) is far below the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant allele frequency in gnomAD (v2.1: 0.0008%, v4.1: 0.00025%) is below the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No data is available demonstrating observation of this variant in healthy adults at sufficient frequency to meet BS2. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate a benign effect of this variant. No experimental data for p.Arg240Pro was identified in the reviewed literature. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data is available to evaluate lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | CDK4 germline disease is associated with missense variants (e.g., R24C/H in familial melanoma), not predominantly truncating variants. BP1 applies when primarily truncating variants cause disease. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No data is available demonstrating this variant observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence support a benign effect: REVEL score is 0.097 (benign), BayesDel score is -0.331 (benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.02). No in silico predictor suggests pathogenicity. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No data is available demonstrating this variant in a case with an established alternative molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as Uncertain significance, not benign/likely benign. The review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star), which does not meet the 3-star expert panel threshold required for BP6 application. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.719G>C, p.Arg240Pro) located in exon 7. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants or intronic variants outside splice consensus. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.