LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_203407.3:c.1308C>G
EZHIP
· NP_981952.1:p.(Asn436Lys)
· NM_203407.3
GRCh37: chrX:51151176 C>G
·
GRCh38: chrX:51408324 C>G
Gene:
EZHIP
Transcript:
NM_203407.3
Final call
Benign
BA1 stand-alone benign
BS1 strong benign
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
EZHIP
Transcript
NM_203407.3
Protein
NP_981952.1:p.(Asn436Lys)
gnomAD AF
0.000693617663895708 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_203407.3:c.1308C>G (p.Asn436Lys) in EZHIP is classified as Benign based on ACMG/AMP 2015 criteria.
2
BA1 (stand-alone benign): Allele frequency exceeds 1% in gnomAD v4.1, with East Asian subpopulation AF of 1.182% (363/30706 alleles) and 3 homozygous individuals observed. grpmax FAF is 1.082%. This population frequency is incompatible with a highly penetrant Mendelian disease variant.
3
BP4 (supporting benign): Computational predictors are concordant for a benign interpretation. SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta=0.01). BayesDel score is -0.940757, strongly predicting benign effect.
4
BA1 alone is sufficient for a Benign classification under ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules. BS1 (strong benign, AF >0.3%) and BP4 (supporting benign, in silico) provide additional supporting evidence.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Benign classification because either BA1 is met or at least two strong benign criteria are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense variant (c.1308C>G, p.Asn436Lys); does not fall into null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants per ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No prior established pathogenic variant at the same amino acid position (p.Asn436) is documented. ClinVar is absent for this variant; no literature identifies a pathogenic N436 substitution. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data available for this variant. Literature pass identified 0 PMIDs; no family-based or parent-of-origin evidence present. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional studies identified for NM_203407.3:c.1308C>G or a systematically characterized range that includes position p.Asn436. Literature pass found 0 PMIDs; OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect without variant-specific functional data. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control or prevalence data comparing affected versus general population for this variant. No affected cohort data available. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No experimental evidence for a different amino acid change at the same position (p.Asn436) producing a pathogenic effect. No literature or ClinVar data identifies an alternative pathogenic substitution at this residue. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue p.Asn436 is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. While EZHIP is a functionally characterized PRC2 inhibitory protein, no domain-level evidence maps residue N436 to a critical functional domain from the available data, and no CSPEC/VCEP framework defines domain boundaries for this gene. |
oncokb
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is present in gnomAD at frequencies exceeding the 0.1% PM2 threshold. gnomAD v2.1: 53/183411 alleles (AF=0.029%), grpmax FAF=0.211%; gnomAD v4.1: 395/569478 alleles (AF=0.069%), grpmax FAF=1.082%. The grpmax FAF in both versions exceeds 0.1%, precluding PM2 application. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not met | No same-residue pathogenic comparator variants identified in ClinVar. PM5 candidate search returned 0 candidates at residue p.Asn436. Classic same-residue PM5 semantics could not be confirmed. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No confirmed de novo occurrence data available. Literature pass identified 0 PMIDs; no parent-of-origin testing or de novo confirmation reported. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No cosegregation data available. No family studies or linkage analysis reported for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | Without gene-specific metrics or a CSPEC/VCEP framework defining a low benign missense rate for EZHIP, PP2 cannot be reliably applied under generic ACMG/AMP rules. HCI prior score is not available for this gene. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.01). BayesDel score is -0.940757, strongly benign (threshold ≤ -0.36). REVEL is not available for this variant. In silico predictors favor a benign interpretation. |
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | Not met | No clinical phenotype data provided in the case files. Without patient phenotype specificity information, PP4 cannot be applied. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | This variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Met | Allele frequency exceeds 1% in gnomAD v4.1. East Asian subpopulation AF is 1.182% (363/30706 alleles) with 3 homozygous individuals. grpmax FAF is 1.082%. On chromosome X, the observation of 3 homozygotes in a general population database provides strong evidence that this is a benign polymorphism rather than a disease-causing variant. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | Allele frequency exceeds 0.3% in gnomAD. gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 1.082% and EAS subpopulation AF is 1.182%, both well above the 0.3% BS1 threshold. This criterion is independently met but is encompassed by the stronger BA1 finding. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | While the variant is observed in population controls at frequencies exceeding 1%, BS2 requires observation in a healthy adult individual for a disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. No specific disease-penetrance context or healthy control confirmation data is available. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect on gene product for this variant. BayesDel benign prediction is computational (BP4 territory), not functional evidence. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data available. No family studies demonstrating lack of cosegregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | No evidence that disease in EZHIP is caused exclusively by an alternative truncating mechanism such that missense variants are unlikely to be pathogenic. BP1 requires a gene where only truncating variants cause disease. |
|
| BP2 | N/A | No data on in trans observation with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder. EZHIP is on chromosome X and no recessive inheritance model has been established for this gene. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene product. SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta score=0.01). BayesDel score is -0.940757, strongly predicting a benign effect (threshold ≤ -0.36). REVEL is not available but the available predictors are concordant for a benign interpretation. |
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not met | No alternative molecular basis for disease has been documented in this case. BP5 requires a specific alternative cause to be identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | This variant is absent from ClinVar. No reputable source has classified this variant as benign. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Synonymous variant criterion. NM_203407.3:c.1308C>G is a missense variant (p.Asn436Lys), not a synonymous or intronic variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.