LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000465.4:c.1868G>A
BARD1
· NP_000456.2:p.(Gly623Glu)
· NM_000465.4
GRCh37: chr2:215609826 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr2:214745102 C>T
Gene:
BARD1
Transcript:
NM_000465.4
Final call
VUS
PS3 moderate
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BARD1
Transcript
NM_000465.4
Protein
NP_000456.2:p.(Gly623Glu)
gnomAD AF
2.2926797832735997e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BARD1 c.1868G>A (p.Gly623Glu) variant is a missense substitution classified as a variant of uncertain significance. Functional evidence from a homology-directed DNA repair assay demonstrates that this variant significantly reduces HDR activity (14–19% of wild-type) and disrupts BRCA1 binding, meeting PS3 at moderate strength (Lee et al., 2015).
2
The variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases (gnomAD v2.1 AF 0.00119%; v4.1 AF 0.00229%), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
3
Multiple computational predictors suggest a benign effect: BayesDel score is 0.016 (benign-leaning), REVEL score is 0.388 (indeterminate), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.05), meeting BP4 at supporting strength.
4
At the time of assessment, no CSPEC or VCEP framework exists for BARD1. The generic ACMG/AMP 2015 framework was applied. Combining PS3_moderate and PM2_supporting with BP4_supporting yields a net evidence profile of one moderate pathogenic criterion plus one supporting pathogenic criterion partially offset by one supporting benign criterion, resulting in an overall classification of Uncertain Significance.
5
ClinVar classifies this variant as Uncertain Significance (1-star, 8 clinical laboratories, ClinVar Variation ID 142123). The evidence from this independent adjudication is consistent with that classification.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_000465.4:c.1868G>A is a missense variant (p.Gly623Glu). It does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798). |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | No previously established pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid position with a different nucleotide change was identified for BARD1 Gly623. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation (with confirmed maternity and paternity) has been reported for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Met | The BARD1 p.Gly623Glu variant was directly tested in a homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) reporter assay in HeLa cells. The variant showed significantly reduced HDR activity (14–19% of wild-type), classified as intermediate function. It was expressed and soluble but failed to bind BRCA1, disrupting a protein–protein interaction critical for DNA repair function. This functional evidence supports a deleterious effect on protein function. |
PMID:26350354
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control study demonstrating statistically significant enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls was identified. |
|
| PS5 | Not met | No evidence that this specific nucleotide change (c.1868G>A) has been previously established as a pathogenic variant in any context. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Gly623 is located in the C-terminal region of BARD1, which contributes to BRCA1 binding and HDR function. The G623E mutant disrupts BRCA1 binding. However, the exact domain boundaries for a well-characterized critical functional domain encompassing residue 623 are not clearly defined in the available evidence. The variant is not in a statistically significant cancer hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). While the C-terminal region is functionally important, domain-level evidence is insufficient to apply PM1 at this position. |
PMID:26350354
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 AF = 0.00119% (3/251,210 alleles), gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00229% (37/1,613,832 alleles), grpmax FAF = 2.233e-05. All observed frequencies are well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 in the generic ACMG framework. No homozygotes have been observed. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | No same-residue comparator variants with expert-panel pathogenic classification could be identified for automated PM5 candidate harvesting. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation (with confirmed maternity and paternity) has been reported for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data (co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members) is available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | PP2 requires that the gene has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. For BARD1, this has not been well established — the gene's status as a definitive HBOC susceptibility gene remains under investigation, and the rate of pathogenic versus benign missense variation is not clearly defined. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of computational evidence do not support a deleterious effect. REVEL score is 0.388 (intermediate, not meeting typical pathogenic thresholds). BayesDel score is 0.016 (strongly benign-leaning). SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta = 0.05). The in silico evidence does not reach the threshold for PP3. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No variant-specific phenotype data demonstrating that the patient's phenotype or family history is highly specific for BARD1-related disease has been identified for this variant. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | The ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain Significance with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). The global PP5 rule requires ClinVar 3-star expert panel classification to apply at supporting strength. This variant does not meet that threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The maximum population frequency of this variant (gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00229%) is far below the 1% threshold for BA1 in the generic ACMG framework. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The maximum population frequency of this variant (gnomAD v4.1 AF = 0.00229%) is below the 0.3% threshold for BS1 in the generic ACMG framework. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No evidence that this variant has been observed in a healthy adult individual for a fully penetrant disorder with clear dominant inheritance. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | The well-established functional study (Lee et al., 2015, PMID:26350354) directly tested p.Gly623Glu and demonstrated significantly reduced HDR function (14–19% of wild-type). The variant was classified as intermediate — not normal/functional. This functional evidence does NOT support a benign effect; rather it supports a deleterious effect. |
PMID:26350354
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data (lack of co-segregation with disease in affected family members) is available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | BP1 requires that the gene has a primary truncating mechanism and that missense variants are not a known cause of disease. BARD1 has known pathogenic missense variants (e.g., in the RING domain) that disrupt BRCA1 binding and HDR function. Therefore BP1 does not apply. |
PMID:26350354
|
| BP2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic BARD1 variant has been reported. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on the gene product. BayesDel score is 0.016 (strongly benign-leaning). SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.05). REVEL score of 0.388 is indeterminate. The preponderance of in silico evidence suggests a benign effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | N/A | No alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified in the case materials that would make this variant less likely to be causative. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | The ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain Significance with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). The global BP6 rule requires ClinVar 3-star expert panel benign/likely benign classification to apply at supporting strength. This variant does not meet that threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants where splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact. NM_000465.4:c.1868G>A is a missense variant (p.Gly623Glu), not a synonymous variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.