LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_058216.3:c.141C>T
RAD51C
· NP_478123.1:p.(Ser47=)
· NM_058216.3
GRCh37: chr17:56770145 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr17:58692784 C>T
Gene:
RAD51C
Transcript:
NM_058216.3
Final call
Likely Benign
BP4 supporting benign
BP6 supporting benign
BP7 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
RAD51C
Transcript
NM_058216.3
Protein
NP_478123.1:p.(Ser47=)
gnomAD AF
4.9560767696291614e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_058216.3:c.141C>T (p.Ser47=) is a synonymous variant in RAD51C exon 1. It is present in gnomAD at low frequency (v2.1: 15/282,726 alleles, AF=0.0053%; v4.1: 80/1,614,180 alleles, AF=0.00496%) with no homozygotes.
2
SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score 0.03), consistent with a benign synonymous change.
3
Thirteen clinical diagnostic laboratories in ClinVar classify this variant as Likely benign (12) or Benign (1) (ClinVar Variation ID: 185138).
4
No functional studies, case-control data, segregation data, or de novo reports were identified for this variant in the literature. A targeted literature search including the RAD51C/RAD51D mutation analysis by Janatova et al. (PMID:26057125) did not identify c.141C>T as a pathogenic finding.
5
Three supporting benign criteria are met: BP4 (computational evidence predicts no impact), BP6 (consensus of clinical laboratories reports benign), and BP7 (synonymous variant with no predicted splicing effect). Per ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules, two or more supporting benign criteria support a classification of Likely Benign.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Synonymous variant (p.Ser47=) that does not result in a null allele. The variant falls into the 'other' bucket under the ClinGen SVI PVS1 decision tree and is not eligible for PVS1 scoring. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | Synonymous variant; no amino acid change exists to compare with established pathogenic missense variants. PS1 is not applicable to synonymous variants. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. No publications or ClinVar submissions report de novo occurrence. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional studies identified for this variant. OncoKB classifies the variant as 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no supporting functional PMIDs. No experimental functional characterization of c.141C>T was found in the literature. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control studies demonstrate enrichment of this variant in affected individuals. PMID 26057125 screened 171 ovarian cancer patients and 1,226 controls but did not report c.141C>T as a pathogenic finding; the variant is classified as a benign polymorphism in that study's context. |
PMID:26057125
|
| PS5 | N/A | Synonymous variant produces no amino acid change; PS5 requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The variant is located in exon 1 at nucleotide c.141, encoding the N-terminal region of RAD51C. No cancerhotspots.org significance was identified (residue_significant=false). The position is not within a well-characterized functional domain with established pathogenic enrichment. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | The variant is present in gnomAD population databases: v2.1 (15/282,726 alleles, AF=0.0053%) and v4.1 (80/1,614,180 alleles, AF=0.00496%). Although rare, it is not absent from controls, and PM2 for a synonymous variant without other evidence of pathogenicity is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | Synonymous variant produces no amino acid change. PM5 requires a novel missense change at a residue where a different pathogenic missense variant has been established. No missense residue context available. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available for this variant. No publications or ClinVar submissions report a confirmed de novo occurrence. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data available for this variant. No family studies with segregation analysis were identified in the literature. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes with low rates of benign missense variation. This is a synonymous variant, not a missense variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max delta score 0.03). REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to synonymous variants. The variant is a synonymous change with no predicted functional consequence. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history data were provided for this case to assess phenotypic specificity. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar classifies this variant as Likely benign (12 clinical laboratories) and Benign (1 clinical laboratory). PP5 requires a reputable source reporting the variant as pathogenic. The ClinVar consensus is benign, not pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency (0.0053% in v2.1, 0.00496% in v4.1) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold. BA1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency (0.0053% in v2.1, 0.00496% in v4.1) is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold for a dominant disorder. BS1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygous individuals observed in gnomAD v2.1 or v4.1. BS2 requires observation of the variant in a healthy adult in the homozygous or hemizygous state, which is not satisfied. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate no deleterious effect for this variant. No experimental functional data were identified in the literature for c.141C>T. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not met | No segregation data are available to assess lack of co-segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is defined for missense variants in genes where primarily truncating variants cause disease. This is a synonymous variant. Additionally, RAD51C has established pathogenic missense variants in addition to truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in RAD51C. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | SKIPPED — in-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions not applicable to this substitution variant. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence indicate no impact on gene product. SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta score 0.03). The variant is synonymous (p.Ser47=) with no predicted effect on protein sequence. REVEL and BayesDel are not available for synonymous variants. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on whether this variant is found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. |
|
| BP6 | Met | Thirteen independent clinical diagnostic laboratories classify this variant as Likely benign (12) or Benign (1) in ClinVar (Variation ID: 185138). The aggregate review status is one-star (criteria provided, single submitter). Although not meeting the three-star expert panel threshold, the strong inter-laboratory consensus across multiple clinical laboratories supports a benign interpretation at the supporting level. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Met | Synonymous variant at c.141 (p.Ser47=) in exon 1. SpliceAI predicts no impact on splicing (max delta score 0.03), indicating the variant does not alter the splice consensus sequence or create a cryptic splice site. The variant is at a wobble position and the nucleotide is not evolutionarily constrained in a manner suggesting functional significance. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.