LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001276270.2:c.1024T>C
MBD4
· NP_001263199.1:p.(Ser342Pro)
· NM_001276270.2
GRCh37: chr3:129155463 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr3:129436620 A>G
Gene:
MBD4
Transcript:
NM_001276270.2
Final call
Benign
BA1 stand-alone benign
BS1 strong benign
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
MBD4
Transcript
NM_001276270.2
Protein
NP_001263199.1:p.(Ser342Pro)
gnomAD AF
0.014657520327721784 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Benign
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001276270.2:c.1024T>C (p.Ser342Pro) in MBD4 is classified as Benign.
2
This variant has an allele frequency of 2.57% in gnomAD v2.1 (7258/282704 alleles, 413 homozygotes) and 1.47% in gnomAD v4.1 (23658/1614052 alleles, 1294 homozygotes), exceeding the stand-alone benign BA1 threshold of >1% (non-VCEP). The grpmax filtering AF is 12.07% in the African/African American population (v2.1).
3
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign by five clinical laboratories (ClinVar variation ID 1268570).
4
Multiple in silico tools predict a benign effect: REVEL score 0.285, BayesDel score -0.438, SpliceAI max delta score 0.03 (BP4 supporting).
5
No functional studies, segregation data, or de novo observations are available for this variant. No publications specifically mention NM_001276270.2:c.1024T>C.
6
PVS1 is not applicable as this is a missense variant, not a null variant.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Benign classification because either BA1 is met or at least two strong benign criteria are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (p.Ser342Pro), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice). The PVS1 variant assessment confirms the variant does not fall into any default null-variant bucket; generic PVS1 framework is not applicable. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not met | No alternative nucleotide change at codon 342 resulting in the same amino acid substitution (p.Ser342Pro) has been reported as pathogenic. No PS1-eligible comparator was identified. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No maternity/paternity-confirmed de novo data are available in ClinVar submissions or the literature. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies have directly tested this variant or a systematically characterized range that includes residue 342. OncoKB found no variant-specific reviewed functional evidence. The in silico scores (REVEL=0.285, BayesDel=-0.438) are computational predictors, not experimental functional data, and do not satisfy PS3 requirements. |
oncokb
revel
bayesdel
|
| PS4 | Not met | This variant is common in the general population (gnomAD AF=2.57% in v2.1, 1.47% in v4.1, grpmax FAF=12.07% in AFR). Its prevalence in cases is not enriched relative to controls; population data strongly argue against pathogenicity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PS5 | Not met | No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic. ClinVar classifies it as Benign (5 clinical laboratories, variation ID 1268570). |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue S342 is not located in a known critical functional domain of MBD4. The methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) spans approximately amino acids 82-147 and the DNA glycosylase domain spans approximately amino acids 426-580. S342 lies in the interdomain region with no established domain-level critical function. The cancerhotspots.org database does not identify this residue as a statistically significant hotspot. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is present at high frequency in gnomAD. v2.1 AF=2.57% and v4.1 AF=1.47% far exceed the PM2 threshold of <0.1% for non-VCEP framework. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not met | No same-residue pathogenic comparator variants were identified. The PM5 candidate search found no ClinVar variants at codon 342 with a different missense change classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo observation has been reported for this variant. No maternity/paternity-confirmed de novo data are available. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available for this variant. No family studies have been reported in the literature or ClinVar submissions. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | MBD4 tolerates missense variation, as evidenced by the high population frequency of this missense variant (AF=2.57% in gnomAD v2.1, 413 homozygotes). The gene does not have a low rate of benign missense variation as required by PP2. |
gnomad_v2
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple lines of in silico evidence predict a benign effect. REVEL score is 0.285 (below the 0.5 threshold), BayesDel score is -0.438 (negative score predicts benign), and SpliceAI delta score is 0.03 (no predicted splicing impact). Computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history data are available for evaluation against a disease-specific presentation. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star), not the required 3-star expert panel for PP5 application. In any case, ClinVar classifies this variant as Benign, not Pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Met | This variant has an allele frequency far exceeding 1% in gnomAD. v2.1 total AF=2.57% (7258/282704 alleles, 413 homozygotes), v4.1 total AF=1.47% (23658/1614052 alleles, 1294 homozygotes), with a grpmax filtering AF of 12.07% in the African/African American population (v2.1) and 12.45% (v4.1). This frequency is incompatible with a rare Mendelian disease-causing variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | This variant has an allele frequency far exceeding 0.3% in gnomAD. v2.1 total AF=2.57%, v4.1 total AF=1.47%. This population frequency is greater than expected for a rare disease-causing variant. Note: the frequency evidence is also captured at the higher BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | Although 413 homozygotes are observed in gnomAD v2.1 (and 1294 in v4.1), MBD4-related tumor predisposition syndrome is an adult-onset cancer predisposition disorder that does not have full penetrance expected at an early age, as required by BS2. The homozygote count is more appropriately captured by BA1 frequency-based evidence. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect are available for this variant. In silico predictors (REVEL=0.285, BayesDel=-0.438) provide computational evidence of benign effect but do not constitute well-established functional studies as required by BS3. |
revel
bayesdel
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available for evaluation. No family studies with affected and unaffected members have been reported. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | While pathogenic germline MBD4 variants include truncating mutations, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that missense variants are never or rarely disease-causing for this gene. The literature describes primarily LOF truncating variants, but the spectrum of pathogenic missense variants has not been comprehensively established to satisfy BP1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in trans with a pathogenic variant are available. No phase information is reported. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no significant impact. REVEL score is 0.285 (predicts benign), BayesDel score is -0.438 (predicts benign), and SpliceAI delta score is 0.03 (predicts no splicing impact). Three independent in silico tools concordantly predict a benign effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data are available regarding an alternate molecular basis for disease in a case harboring this variant. No patient-level data were reviewed. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). The PP5/BP6 framework rule requires a 3-star expert panel review status for supporting-strength application. Although 5 clinical laboratories classify this variant as Benign, the review status does not meet the 3-star threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted splice impact. This is a missense variant (c.1024T>C, p.Ser342Pro), not a synonymous variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions or insertions in a repetitive region without a known function. This is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is for recessive disorders (variant detected in trans with a pathogenic variant). MBD4-related tumor predisposition is an autosomal dominant disorder; PM3 is not applicable. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 applies to non-repeat in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants. This is a missense substitution, not an in-frame indel or stop-loss variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.