LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002691.4:c.187G>A
POLD1
· NP_002682.2:p.(Glu63Lys)
· NM_002691.4
GRCh37: chr19:50902295 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr19:50399038 G>A
Gene:
POLD1
Transcript:
NM_002691.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
POLD1
Transcript
NM_002691.4
Protein
NP_002682.2:p.(Glu63Lys)
gnomAD AF
3.151749671317534e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_002691.4:c.187G>A (p.Glu63Lys) in POLD1 is a rare missense variant absent from population databases at significant frequency (gnomAD v2.1 AF=0.00675%, v4.1 AF=0.00315%), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
Multiple in silico predictors uniformly support a benign interpretation: REVEL score 0.018 (strongly benign), BayesDel score -0.510638 (benign), and SpliceAI max delta 0.01 (no splicing impact), meeting BP4 at supporting benign strength.
3
The variant has been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 407981) as Likely benign by 3 clinical laboratories and as Uncertain significance by 2 clinical laboratories, with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star), which does not meet the threshold for PP5 or BP6.
4
No variant-specific functional studies, de novo observations, segregation data, or case-control studies were identified in the curated literature.
5
With PM2 (supporting) and BP4 (supporting benign) as the only met criteria, the evidence is insufficient to classify this variant as either pathogenic or benign; this variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense variant (c.187G>A, p.Glu63Lys) does not fall into null-variant categories (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants) required for PVS1 application per ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework (PMC6185798). |
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Glu63Lys) at this position has been identified in ClinVar or the literature. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data available for this variant; no parental confirmation studies identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No variant-specific functional studies identified in the literature or curated databases. OncoKB reports unknown oncogenic effect. REVEL and BayesDel scores are in silico predictors and do not constitute functional evidence for PS3. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control studies or statistically significant enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls has been identified. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a standard ACMG/AMP 2015 criterion; no applicable evidence type defined within the generic ACMG framework. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Variant lies at residue 63 in the N-terminal region of POLD1, upstream of the exonuclease domain (residues ~304-490) and polymerase domain. No statistically significant hotspot identified at this residue by cancerhotspots.org. No well-characterized functional domain for which missense variants at this position are established as pathogenic. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from population databases at significant frequency. gnomAD v2.1 reports an allele frequency of 0.00675% (13/192,696 alleles, no homozygotes); gnomAD v4.1 reports 0.00315% (49/1,554,692 alleles, no homozygotes). Both are well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold for a rare variant in the generic ACMG framework. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not met | No known pathogenic missense variant at the same residue (p.Glu63) has been identified. Automated PM5 candidate search returned no eligible comparators in ClinVar. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No de novo occurrence data available for this variant; no confirmed de novo reports with maternity/paternity confirmation identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | While POLD1 is a disease-associated gene with pathogenic missense variants (particularly in the exonuclease domain), no gene-level missense constraint metric (e.g., missense Z-score or observed/expected ratio) was provided to establish a low rate of benign missense variation required for PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico predictions uniformly support a benign interpretation. REVEL score is 0.018 (strongly benign; pathogenic threshold >0.5). BayesDel score is -0.510638 (benign; pathogenic threshold >0.0). SpliceAI max delta is 0.01 (no predicted splicing impact). These scores do not support a pathogenic computational prediction. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | No patient phenotype or family history data available for assessment. No evidence that the patient's clinical presentation is highly specific for a POLD1-associated disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar classification is Likely benign / Uncertain significance (Variation ID: 407981) with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). Expert panel review (3-star) is required for PP5 application. Current review status does not meet the threshold for reputable-source pathogenic attribution. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency is 0.00675% (v2.1) and 0.00315% (v4.1), far below the 1% BA1 threshold for a common benign variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | gnomAD allele frequency is 0.00675% (v2.1) and 0.00315% (v4.1), well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. The grpmax filtering allele frequency (FAF) is 0.0002173 (v2.1) and 0.0002901 (v4.1), also below threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygotes observed in gnomAD (v2.1: 0 homozygotes; v4.1: 0 homozygotes). No evidence of observation in healthy adults in a homozygous or hemizygous state. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect for this variant. In silico predictors (REVEL, BayesDel) are computational tools, not experimental functional evidence. No in vitro or in vivo functional assays identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not met | No non-segregation data available for this variant in affected families. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | POLD1 is associated with disease through both loss-of-function and missense mechanisms. Pathogenic missense variants are established in this gene, most notably in the exonuclease proofreading domain causing polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP). Therefore, a missense variant in POLD1 cannot be presumed benign solely on the basis of variant type. |
|
| BP2 | Not met | No evidence of observation in trans with a known pathogenic variant in POLD1; no data on allelic phase available. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple in silico predictors uniformly support a benign interpretation. REVEL score is 0.018 (strongly benign; threshold for pathogenic >0.5). BayesDel score is -0.510638 (benign; threshold for pathogenic >0.0). SpliceAI max delta score is 0.01, predicting no significant splicing impact. Multiple lines of computational evidence agree on absence of deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | No evidence of an alternate molecular basis for disease in this case; no information on other genetic findings available. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar classification is Likely benign / Uncertain significance (Variation ID: 407981) with review status 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star). Expert panel review (3-star) is required for BP6 application. Current review status does not meet the threshold for reputable-source benign attribution. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Missense variant (c.187G>A, p.Glu63Lys); BP7 applies only to synonymous (silent) variants with no predicted impact on splicing. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.