LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.3459+12G>T
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.?
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133233923 C>A
·
GRCh38: chr12:132657337 C>A
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP7 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
1.2390852081725104e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_006231.4:c.3459+12G>T is a rare intronic variant in POLE located 12 bases downstream of exon 28.
2
This variant is extremely rare in population databases, present at an allele frequency of 1.24e-6 (2/1,614,094 alleles) in gnomAD v4.1 and absent from gnomAD v2.1 (PM2_Supporting).
3
SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.0), and the variant lies outside the canonical splice consensus at the +12 intronic position (BP7_Supporting).
4
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely Benign by a single clinical laboratory (VariationID 1580883, 1-star review status), though the 1-star rating is insufficient for PP5 or BP6 application.
5
No functional data, segregation data, de novo reports, or case-control evidence are available for this variant. The León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework is exclusively missense-focused and does not provide applicable rules for this intronic variant.
6
The variant has not been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC) and is not a known hotspot (cancerhotspots.org negative).
7
With PM2_Supporting (pathogenic) and BP7_Supporting (benign), the evidence is conflicting and insufficient to reach a likely benign or likely pathogenic classification. This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Under ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules, a single supporting pathogenic criterion with a single supporting benign criterion does not meet any classified category threshold and defaults to VUS (Uncertain Significance).
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Intronic variant at c.3459+12, 12 bases downstream of exon 28. Not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice site variant. PVS1 decision tree classifies this as 'other' and does not apply the generic null-variant framework. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | Intronic variant with no protein change; no amino acid residue to compare against known pathogenic missense variants at the same position. |
|
| PS2 | Not met | No de novo evidence identified for this variant. The only literature source (PMID:28492532) is a methods paper that does not report any patient-level data for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No functional assay data exists for this intronic variant. The León-Castillo et al. 2020 framework and supplementary tables are exclusively missense-focused. SpliceAI predicts no splicing effect (delta=0.0), indicating this variant is unlikely to be functional. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323
|
| PS4 | Not met | Variant is absent from COSMIC and not present in the León-Castillo et al. 2020 recurrent variant table (Supplementary Table S1, missense-only). No germline case-control enrichment data available. Custom PS4_Supporting rule requires exact missense variant recurrence in both COSMIC and TCGA EC cohorts with combined count >=10. |
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PS5 | N/A | Variant does not alter an amino acid residue; cannot assess whether a different pathogenic missense change has been described at the same codon. |
|
| PM1 | N/A | Custom León-Castillo 2020 PM1 applies only to missense variants in the exonuclease domain. This is an intronic variant (c.3459+12G>T) that does not reside in a protein functional domain. No hotspot data (cancerhotspots.org negative). |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PM2 | Met | Extremely low allele frequency in population databases. Present at AF=1.24e-6 (2/1,614,094 alleles) in gnomAD v4.1 and absent from gnomAD v2.1. Well below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. No homozygotes observed. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | N/A | Intronic variant with no protein residue; unable to perform same-residue missense comparator search. PM5 candidate harvesting confirmed not applicable (eligible_for_classic_pm5_search=false). |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo data available in the literature or ClinVar submissions for this variant. Cannot assess PM6 without variant-specific de novo confirmation. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data available for this variant. Cannot assess co-segregation with disease in affected family members. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes with low rate of benign missense variation. This variant is intronic (c.3459+12G>T), not missense. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. SpliceAI delta=0.0 predicts no splicing impact. REVEL and BayesDel unavailable for intronic variants. The León-Castillo custom PP3 rule applies only to missense variants present in Supplementary Tables S2/S3. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype data provided for this case. Cannot assess whether the variant's phenotype is highly specific for a disease. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar classification is Likely Benign, not Pathogenic. Review status is 1-star (criteria provided, single submitter), which is below the 3-star expert panel threshold required for PP5. Additionally, PP5 requires a pathogenic assertion — the only ClinVar submission asserts Likely Benign. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 1.24e-6 (0.00012%) in gnomAD v4.1, well below the 1% BA1 threshold. Absent from gnomAD v2.1. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Allele frequency is 1.24e-6 (0.00012%) in gnomAD v4.1, well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No homozygotes observed in gnomAD v4.1 or v2.1. No evidence of homozygous or biallelic occurrence in controls. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect for this specific variant. SpliceAI prediction is computational, not a functional assay. |
spliceai
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data available. Cannot assess lack of segregation in affected family members. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where truncating variants are the primary disease mechanism. This variant is intronic (c.3459+12G>T), not missense. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in trans with a known pathogenic variant. Cannot assess BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Skipped per instructions — trivially not applicable. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Only one line of computational evidence (SpliceAI delta=0.0) is available. BP4 requires multiple lines of computational evidence suggesting no impact. REVEL and BayesDel are unavailable for intronic variants. The León-Castillo custom BP4 rule applies only to missense variants in Tables S2/S3. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No data on alternate molecular basis for disease. Cannot assess whether this variant was found in a case with a clear alternative explanation. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar classification is Likely Benign with 1-star review status (criteria provided, single submitter). BP6 requires a 3-star expert panel reputable source classification as benign. Single submitter does not meet the threshold. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Met | Intronic variant at c.3459+12, 12 bases downstream of exon 28, outside the canonical splice site consensus region. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.0, no cryptic splice site creation). Per ClinGen SVI guidance, BP7 can be applied to intronic variants beyond the +7 position when splicing prediction tools show no effect. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.