LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-08-18
Case ID: NM_001130442.2_c.34G_A_20260818_153733
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_001130442.2:c.34G>A

HRAS  · NP_001123914.1:p.(Gly12Ser)  · NM_001130442.2
GRCh37: chr11:534289 C>T  ·  GRCh38: chr11:534289 C>T
Gene: HRAS Transcript: NM_001130442.2
Final call
Pathogenic
PS2 strong PS3 supporting PS4 strong PM1 moderate PM2 supporting PP5 supporting
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
HRAS
Transcript
NM_001130442.2
Protein
NP_001123914.1:p.(Gly12Ser)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS2 (Strong): de novo origin confirmed by parental genotyping in multiple Costello syndrome families.
2
PS3 (Supporting): functional studies show increased RAS-GTP loading and downstream MEK/ERK activation, consistent with the G12 gain-of-function mechanism.
3
PS4 (Strong): found in 30 of 37 HRAS-positive Costello syndrome patients in an independent 43-case series.
4
PM1 (Moderate): Gly12 lies in the P-loop (residues 10-17), a critical functional domain.
5
PM2 (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
6
PP5 (Supporting): the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified this exact variant as Pathogenic.
7
Overall Pathogenic: PS2 (Strong) plus PS4 (Strong) satisfy the VCEP's Rule1 and Rule5 combination rules.
Final determination: Rule5 of the ClinGen RASopathy VCEP HRAS v2.3 criteria-combination framework (>=2 criteria from the PS1/PS2/PS4/PM5_Strong/PM6_Strong/PP1_Strong strong-tier partition) is satisfied by PS2 (strong) and PS4 (strong), independently corroborated by Rule1 (>=1 of the same list), so the variant is classified as Pathogenic.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A Not applicable: p.Gly12Ser is a missense change, not a loss-of-function (null) variant.
cspec
PS1 Not assessed Not assessed: no independently established pathogenic variant producing the same p.Gly12Ser amino acid change was available as a comparator.
PS2 Met Met (Strong): de novo origin was confirmed by parental genotyping in multiple Costello syndrome families, meeting the VCEP two-point Strong threshold.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:17054105
PS3 Met Met (Supporting): functional studies show increased RAS-GTP loading and downstream MEK/ERK activation in VCEP-approved assay categories. Flagged for human review: primary assay publications not yet independently verified.
clinvar vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies cspec
PS4 Met Met (Strong): the variant was found in 30 of 37 HRAS-positive Costello syndrome patients, exceeding the VCEP's five-point Strong threshold.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:16443854 PMID:16881968 PMID:17054105
PM1 Met Met (Moderate): Gly12 lies in the P-loop (residues 10-17), a VCEP-designated critical functional domain.
cspec vcep_alignment_with_pm1_domains_pptx
PM2 Met Met (Supporting): absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
PM3 N/A Not applicable: HRAS Costello syndrome is autosomal dominant, so a criterion requiring a pathogenic variant in trans does not apply.
cspec
PM4 N/A Not applicable: a single amino acid substitution with no change in protein length.
cspec
PM5 Not assessed Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available on other pathogenic codon-12 residue changes (e.g., p.Gly12Ala, p.Gly12Cys) needed as comparators.
pm5_candidates
PM6 Not met Not met: de novo origin is already confirmed with parental genotyping and paternity verification, so it is scored under PS2 rather than assumed.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:17054105
PP1 Not assessed Not assessed: no affected-relative segregation data with informative meioses was available.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:17054105
PP2 N/A Not applicable: the RASopathy VCEP specification excludes this criterion for HRAS.
cspec
PP3 Not met Not met: REVEL score 0.695 falls below the VCEP's 0.7 threshold, and SpliceAI (max delta 0.00) shows no splice impact.
cspec revel spliceai
PP4 N/A Not applicable: the RASopathy VCEP specification excludes this criterion for HRAS.
cspec
PP5 Met Met (Supporting): the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified this exact variant as Pathogenic.
clinvar
BA1 Not met Not met: absent from gnomAD, far below the required 0.05% allele frequency threshold.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS1 Not met Not met: absent from gnomAD, below the required 0.025% allele frequency threshold.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS2 Not assessed Not assessed: no documented healthy adult carrying the variant was identified.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS3 N/A Not applicable: the RASopathy VCEP specification excludes this criterion for HRAS.
cspec
BS4 Not assessed Not assessed: no informative relatives showing the variant failing to segregate with disease were documented.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:17054105
BP1 N/A Not applicable: BP1 applies only to truncating variants, and p.Gly12Ser is a missense change.
cspec
BP2 Not assessed Not assessed: no evidence established the variant's phase (in cis or trans) relative to another pathogenic variant.
cspec
BP3 N/A Not applicable: BP3 applies to in-frame indels in repetitive regions, not to missense substitutions.
cspec
BP4 Not met Not met: REVEL score 0.695 is well above the VCEP's 0.3 threshold for benign impact.
cspec revel
BP5 Not assessed Not assessed: no alternate molecular diagnosis was documented for the affected individuals.
cspec PMID:16170316 PMID:16443854 PMID:16881968 PMID:17054105
BP6 Not met Not met: the ClinVar expert-panel classification for this exact variant is Pathogenic, not Benign.
clinvar
BP7 N/A Not applicable: BP7 applies to synonymous or non-coding variants, not missense changes.
cspec
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.