LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001274.5:c.484C>T
CHEK1
· NP_001265.2:p.(Arg162Cys)
· NM_001274.5
GRCh37: chr11:125503117 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr11:125633222 C>T
Gene:
CHEK1
Transcript:
NM_001274.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CHEK1
Transcript
NM_001274.5
Protein
NP_001265.2:p.(Arg162Cys)
gnomAD AF
1.2466107769501667e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PM2 (Supporting): gnomAD v4.1 overall allele frequency is 0.00125%, below the 0.1% rarity threshold, with no homozygotes.
2
Final: only PM2 is met at supporting strength, no ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rule is satisfied, and the variant is classified as Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback: with only PM2 (supporting) met and no other criteria met, none of the Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic/Benign/Likely Benign combination thresholds are reached, so the variant is classified as Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: as a missense substitution, it does not trigger a null-variant mechanism such as nonsense-mediated decay. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not met | Not met: no ClinVar record exists for this position, and no established pathogenic variant producing p.(Arg162Cys) from a different nucleotide change was found. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no parental testing or parentage-confirming evidence was available, so a de novo origin cannot be established. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no functional or biochemical assay data specific to p.(Arg162Cys) was available. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no case-control data or variant-specific enrichment analysis for c.484C>T was provided. |
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no curated hotspot/domain definition is available, and cancerhotspots.org does not list this position as a statistically significant hotspot. |
oncokb
|
| PM2 | Met | Met (supporting): gnomAD v4.1 overall allele frequency is 0.00125%, far below the 0.1% PM2 rarity threshold, with no homozygotes. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-proband data places this variant in trans with a pathogenic CHEK1 variant. |
clinvar
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: this missense substitution does not change protein length, leaving nothing for this criterion to evaluate. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no established pathogenic missense variant at codon 162 was identified. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no parental testing result is present, so a presumed de novo occurrence cannot be determined. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no family segregation data or informative meioses were available. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no CHEK1-specific guidance or missense-constraint data establishes missense as a common disease mechanism. |
oncokb
|
| PP3 | Not met | Not met: REVEL score 0.437 falls within the gray zone (0.250-0.750), providing no in-silico support for pathogenicity. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no proband phenotype indicating a CHEK1-specific presentation was provided. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: the exact variant has no ClinVar record, so no expert-panel pathogenic assertion exists. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: highest population frequency is 0.00450% (East Asian), far below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: highest ancestry-specific frequency is 0.00450%, below the 0.3% BS1 benign threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no phenotype-confirmed healthy adult carriers were documented; sparse heterozygous observations alone are insufficient. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no variant-specific functional assay data for p.(Arg162Cys) was available to demonstrate normal function. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no genotype-positive unaffected or genotype-negative affected relatives were documented. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no quantitative data confirms that missense variants are not a common cause of CHEK1 disease. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no phase or pedigree data places this variant in cis or trans with a pathogenic CHEK1 variant. |
clinvar
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: this missense substitution is not an in-frame insertion/deletion in a repetitive region. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL score 0.437 is above the <0.250 BP4 threshold required for benign in-silico support. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no alternate molecular diagnosis providing another basis for disease was documented. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: the exact variant has no ClinVar record, so no expert-panel benign assertion exists. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: this criterion applies to synonymous variants, and this missense substitution alters the protein sequence. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.