LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000314.8:c.383A>C
PTEN
· NP_000305.3:p.(Lys128Thr)
· NM_000314.8
GRCh37: chr10:89692899 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr10:87933142 A>C
Gene:
PTEN
Transcript:
NM_000314.8
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 moderate
PM1 moderate
PM2 supporting
PP2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Protein
NP_000305.3:p.(Lys128Thr)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
Likely Pathogenic: PS3 Moderate is supported by K128T cumulative fitness score -1.97828658 below the PTEN damaging threshold.
2
Likely Pathogenic: PM1 Moderate is supported by Lys128 residing in the critical catalytic interval 123-130.
3
Likely Pathogenic: PM2 Supporting is supported by absence from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.
4
Likely Pathogenic: PP2 Supporting applies to this PTEN missense variant under the VCEP missense-disease mechanism rule.
5
Likely Pathogenic: PP3 Supporting is supported by REVEL 0.921 exceeding the PTEN threshold of 0.7.
Final determination:
Under Rule14 of the PTEN Expert Panel Version 3.2 framework, two Pathogenic moderate criteria plus at least two Pathogenic supporting criteria classify the variant as Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: c.383A>C causes missense p.Lys128Thr, whereas the PTEN PVS1 tree covers null, canonical splice-site, and deletion variants. |
cspec
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no established pathogenic comparator with the same Lys128Thr amino-acid change was identified. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no proband-level parental testing, maternity/paternity confirmation, family-history assessment, or germline de novo observation is documented. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | Met at Moderate: K128T Cum_score -1.97828658 is below the PTEN VCEP PS3 threshold of -1.11 with High_conf=True. |
vcep_mmc2
PMID:21828076
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no qualifying PTEN proband specificity score or germline affected-versus-control prevalence estimate is available for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | Met | Met at moderate strength: Lys128 lies within the PTEN VCEP critical catalytic-motif interval 123-130. |
cspec
PMID:21828076
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.00001. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | Not applicable: PTEN VCEP 3.2 excludes PM3 because PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome is autosomal dominant. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: p.Lys128Thr is a single-residue missense substitution, not an in-frame length change or stop-loss extension. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no pathogenic or likely pathogenic different missense comparator at Lys128 was available for the required BLOSUM62 comparison. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no germline proband-level presumed de novo observation, parental testing, family-history assessment, or phenotype-specific proband documentation is available. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives, pedigree genotypes, or countable meioses are documented for the variant. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: the PTEN VCEP explicitly applies PP2 to missense variants in PTEN under its specified missense-disease mechanism rule. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Met: missense REVEL score 0.921 exceeds the PTEN VCEP PP3 supporting threshold of >0.7. |
cspec
revel
|
| PP4 | N/A | Not applicable: the PTEN Expert Panel incorporates phenotype specificity into PS4 rather than allowing independent PP4 use. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | Not applicable: PTEN PP5 is VCEP-excluded and this exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than exceeding the PTEN BA1 threshold of 0.00056. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, below both PTEN BS1 frequency ranges beginning at 0.0000043. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no homozygous observation or parental confirmation is available, while gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 report the variant absent. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | Not met: K128T Cum_score -1.97828658 is not greater than the PTEN VCEP BS3 threshold of 0 and indicates loss of function. |
vcep_mmc2
PMID:21828076
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected non-carriers, family genotypes, pedigree data, or documented non-segregation observations are available. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | Not applicable: the governing PTEN VCEP explicitly excludes BP1. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-proband phase data or qualifying observations with another pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant are documented. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: the PTEN VCEP explicitly marks BP3 as Not Applicable, and this variant is missense rather than a repeat-region in-frame indel. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: missense REVEL score 0.921 is above the PTEN VCEP BP4 supporting threshold of <0.5. |
cspec
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: an acquired MITF amplification in a melanoma cohort does not establish the PTEN VCEP's required highly penetrant alternate germline disease and non-overlapping history. |
cspec
PMID:24265153
|
| BP6 | N/A | Not applicable: PTEN BP6 is VCEP-excluded and this exact variant has no ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: c.383A>C produces missense p.Lys128Thr, not a synonymous or qualifying intronic variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.