LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.62+2T>G
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.?
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133263838 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr12:132687252 A>C
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
Pathogenic
PVS1 very strong
PP3 moderate
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
0.0 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
Pathogenic: PVS1 very strong supports loss of normal POLE splicing at the canonical +2 donor site.
2
Pathogenic: PP3 moderate is met by SpliceAI maximum delta 0.989.
3
Pathogenic: PM2 supporting is met because the variant is absent from gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,487,734 alleles).
Final determination:
Under the local León-Castillo 2020 POLE framework, PVS1 at very strong plus one moderate and one supporting criterion produces a Pathogenic classification.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Met | Met at very strong: canonical splice-donor c.62+2T>G in the relevant POLE transcript has SpliceAI maximum delta 0.989 and no demonstrated NMD-escape downgrade. |
pvs1_generic_framework
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
spliceai
|
| PS1 | N/A | Not applicable: the canonical splice variant has protein consequence p.?, so no amino-acid change exists for PS1 comparison. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no parental genotypes, parentage confirmation, or testing methodology are documented to establish a de novo occurrence. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: SpliceAI max delta 0.989 is computational and does not substitute for a validated variant-specific functional assay with appropriate controls. |
spliceai
|
| PS4 | Not met | Not met: the POLE PS4 rule requires an exact recurrent pathogenic missense variant with combined COSMIC/TCGA count >=10, but c.62+2T>G is absent and is splice-region. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PM1 | N/A | Not applicable: PM1 is restricted to specified exonuclease-domain missense substitutions, while this variant is intronic with protein consequence p.?. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting: AF 0 in gnomAD v4.1 (0/1,487,734 alleles) is below the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-proband observation or phased pathogenic variant in trans is documented for NM_006231.4:c.62+2T>G. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: c.62+2T>G is a canonical intronic splice variant with p.? consequence, not an established in-frame protein-length change. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | N/A | Not applicable: PM5 requires a missense residue, but this canonical splice variant has no defined protein residue or amino-acid substitution. |
pm5_candidates
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no published or clinical case evidence documents this variant as presumed de novo without parental testing. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no informative meioses or affected and unaffected relatives with genotype-phenotype segregation data are documented. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | Not applicable: PP2 evaluates missense variation, whereas this variant is canonical splice with protein consequence p.?. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
|
| PP3 | Met | Met at moderate strength: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.989 exceeds the >=0.5 threshold for predicted splice impact. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no patient phenotype or disease-specific clinical presentation is available to evaluate against a PP4 specificity rule. |
vcep_path_250_323
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: ClinVar has no exact record or expert-panel Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic classification for c.62+2T>G. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 total AF 0 (0/1,487,734 alleles), far below the >=0.05 BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 total AF 0 (0/1,487,734 alleles), below the >=0.01 BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 reports zero homozygotes and zero alleles, providing no healthy-population observation for BS2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: SpliceAI max delta 0.989 predicts splice impact and provides no validated evidence of preserved normal function for BS3. |
spliceai
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no unaffected variant carriers or other informative non-segregation observations are documented. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | Not applicable: BP1 addresses benign missense context, but this variant is canonical splice with protein consequence p.?. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no cis or trans observation with a pathogenic variant is documented for NM_006231.4:c.62+2T>G. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: the variant is a canonical splice-donor substitution, not an in-frame indel in a repetitive protein region. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: SpliceAI maximum delta 0.989 exceeds the <=0.1 threshold for BP4 supporting evidence. |
spliceai
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no phenotype, alternative molecular diagnosis, or competing cause is available to evaluate BP5. |
vcep_path_250_323
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: ClinVar has no exact record or expert-panel Benign/Likely benign classification for c.62+2T>G. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: c.62+2T>G is an intronic canonical splice variant, not a synonymous coding variant eligible for BP7. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.