LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000455.5:c.911G>A
STK11
· NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln)
· NM_000455.5
GRCh37: chr19:1221996 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr19:1221997 G>A
Gene:
STK11
Transcript:
NM_000455.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
STK11
Transcript
NM_000455.5
Protein
NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln)
gnomAD AF
1.8462517905459174e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PM2 supporting: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is below 0.0001 with zero homozygotes.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, one supporting criterion alone does not satisfy any pathogenic, likely pathogenic, likely benign, or benign combination, so the final call is VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_000455.5:c.911G>A in STK11 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | PS1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no parental testing or confirmed de novo observation is documented for the present c.911G>A (p.Arg304Gln) variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no validated functional assay tested the exact R304Q variant, while available assays studied different STK11 substitutions such as R304W. |
PMID:12552571
PMID:17404884
PMID:9837816
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no exact-variant case-control counts, enrichment statistic, odds ratio, or affected-case versus control comparison is available. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | PM1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting: gnomAD v4.1 all-comers AF 1.84625e-05 is below the generic PM2 threshold of 0.0001, with zero homozygotes. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| PM3 | N/A | Not applicable: STK11-associated Peutz–Jeghers syndrome is autosomal dominant, so recessive biallelic evidence criterion PM3 does not apply. |
PMID:17404884
PMID:25741868
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_000455.5:c.911G>A in STK11 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | PM5 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no apparently de novo occurrence is reported for c.911G>A (p.Arg304Gln), and parental testing is unavailable. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: zero informative meioses or affected relatives carrying c.911G>A (p.Arg304Gln) are documented. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | PP2 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.567 is below the supporting PP3 threshold of 0.644 for missense variants. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no patient phenotype or phenotype-specific diagnostic findings are documented for comparison with an STK11-related disorder. |
clinvar
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: the exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions and no expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: all-comers gnomAD v4.1 AF 1.84625e-05 is far below the generic BA1 threshold of 0.05. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: the highest observed gnomAD ancestry-specific AF, 0.000183666, remains below the generic BS1 threshold of 0.01. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| BS2 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 each report 0 homozygotes, so no healthy-homozygote evidence supports BS2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no validated benign functional assay tested exact STK11 R304Q with evidence of preserved biologically relevant function. |
PMID:12552571
PMID:17404884
PMID:9837816
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no tested unaffected relatives or phenotype-informed non-segregation observations are documented for c.911G>A (p.Arg304Gln). |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | BP1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented cis/trans phase or co-occurrence observation with a pathogenic STK11 variant is available. |
PMID:25741868
clinvar
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_000455.5:c.911G>A in STK11 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.567 exceeds the supporting BP4 threshold of 0.29 for missense variants. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected individual with a documented alternate molecular diagnosis is available to support BP5. |
clinvar
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: one ordinary laboratory submission is Likely benign, but the exact ClinVar record has zero expert-panel submissions. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000455.5:c.911G>A in STK11 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000446.1:p.(Arg304Gln). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.