LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001903.5:c.1193A>G
CTNNA1
· NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser)
· NM_001903.5
GRCh37: chr5:138223228 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr5:138887539 A>G
Gene:
CTNNA1
Transcript:
NM_001903.5
Final call
VUS
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CTNNA1
Transcript
NM_001903.5
Protein
NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser)
gnomAD AF
0.00013216629871072707 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
BP4 supporting: REVEL 0.079 meets the missense BP4 threshold of <=0.29.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, one supporting benign criterion does not meet the Benign or Likely Benign thresholds, so the final call is VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_001903.5:c.1193A>G in CTNNA1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | PS1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: parental genotypes and confirmed maternity/paternity are not documented for a de novo CTNNA1 c.1193A>G observation. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no variant-specific validated functional assay or assay-control result for CTNNA1 p.Asn398Ser was identified. |
clinvar
PMID:27153395
PMID:32051609
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no exact-variant case-control enrichment, odds ratio, or adequately documented affected-case series was identified. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PMID:27153395
PMID:32051609
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | PM1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | Not met: default all-comers AF is 0.000132166 in gnomAD v4.1, exceeding the 0.0001 PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-proband observation with a pathogenic variant and no phase information establishing trans or cis is reported. |
clinvar
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_001903.5:c.1193A>G in CTNNA1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | PM5 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no variant-specific assumed de novo occurrence or family-history context is documented for CTNNA1 c.1193A>G. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no informative affected or unaffected relatives, meioses, or phenotype-concordant segregation data are reported for CTNNA1 c.1193A>G. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | PP2 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Not met: missense REVEL score 0.079 is below the PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no carrier phenotype or highly specific clinical diagnostic finding was supplied for this exact variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has 0 expert-panel submissions for the exact variant, and available laboratory assertions are not qualifying Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic expert-panel evidence. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the highest gnomAD v4.1 subgroup frequency is 0.000467065, far below the 0.05 BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: the highest gnomAD v4.1 subgroup frequency is 0.000467065, below the generic 0.01 BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 report zero homozygotes, so the BS2 healthy-homozygote observation is absent. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
PMID:25741868
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no validated normal-function assay with appropriate controls for CTNNA1 p.Asn398Ser was identified. |
clinvar
PMID:27153395
PMID:32051609
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no adequately tested affected relatives lacking CTNNA1 c.1193A>G are documented for non-segregation. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | BP1 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no second pathogenic variant or cis/trans phase information is documented for this missense variant. |
clinvar
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_001903.5:c.1193A>G in CTNNA1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Met | Met at supporting strength: missense REVEL score 0.079 meets the BP4 threshold of <=0.29. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected case with a documented alternate molecular explanation was supplied for this exact variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
clinvar
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has 0 expert-panel submissions; the exact-variant Benign and Likely benign assertions are single-submitter laboratory records. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_001903.5:c.1193A>G in CTNNA1 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_001894.2:p.(Asn398Ser). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication, because no structured VCEP criteria-combination framework governs this case (framework_complete=false); the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback applies. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.