LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.4477G>C
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.(Ala1493Pro)
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133219884 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr12:132643298 C>G
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
Likely Benign
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.(Ala1493Pro)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
Likely Benign: PM2 supporting reflects absence from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.
2
Likely Benign: BP4 supporting reflects a REVEL score of 0.147 below 0.250.
Final determination:
Under the local POLE framework's ACMG/AMP combination rules, two supporting benign criteria, PM2 and BP4, yield a Likely Benign classification.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: c.4477G>C is a missense substitution producing p.(Ala1493Pro), not one of the null-variant types named by PVS1. |
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no previously established pathogenic variant producing the same Ala1493Pro amino-acid change was identified in the reviewed sources. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
vcep_path_250_323_s001
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented proband phenotype, family-history assessment, parental genotypes, or confirmed maternity and paternity are available. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no variant-specific validated functional assay or result demonstrating a damaging effect on POLE p.Ala1493Pro is available. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | PS4 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Not met: Ala1493Pro is absent from all three POLE PM1 substitution lists, including the five established hotspots and ten recurrent exonuclease-domain variants. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
vcep_path_250_323_s001
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, consistent with allele frequency 0 versus the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented pathogenic second allele, parental testing, phase result, affected proband, or inheritance mode establishes a recessive in-trans observation. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: p.(Ala1493Pro) is a missense substitution with no protein-length change, whereas PM4 requires an in-frame indel or stop-loss variant. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no different pathogenic missense substitution at the same Ala1493 residue was identified in the reviewed evidence. |
pm5_candidates
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
vcep_path_250_323_s001
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no parental genotypes or parentage information establish that the variant is assumed de novo. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives, informative meioses, segregation results, or phenotype-matched family members are documented. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the reviewed evidence does not establish both a low benign-missense rate and a common missense disease mechanism for POLE. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.147 is below the generic missense PP3 threshold of >0.750 after no exact entry was found in either governing supplementary table. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | PP4 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, far below the >=0.05 stand-alone benign frequency threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 showed no variant observations, below the generic BS1 allele-frequency threshold of >=0.01. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no healthy adult carrier, zygosity, age, or penetrance observation was documented for this variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no variant-specific validated functional assay or result showing no damaging effect on POLE p.Ala1493Pro is available. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives with documented phenotypes and variant-negative genotypes are available to demonstrate lack of segregation. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the reviewed evidence does not establish that POLE disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no pathogenic variant or phase result is documented to establish the required cis or trans relationship for BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: c.4477G>C is a missense substitution, not an in-frame deletion or insertion required for BP3. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Met at supporting: REVEL 0.147 is below the generic missense BP4 threshold of <0.250 after no exact entry was found in either governing supplementary table. |
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s003
vcep_path_250_323_s004
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | BP5 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 could not be assessed because its agent did not produce valid output. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: c.4477G>C is a missense variant producing p.Ala1493Pro, not a synonymous substitution required for BP7. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.