LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002468.5:c.755T>C
MYD88
· NP_002459.3:p.(Leu252Pro)
· NM_002468.5
GRCh37: chr3:38182641 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr3:38141150 T>C
Gene:
MYD88
Transcript:
NM_002468.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
MYD88
Transcript
NM_002468.5
Protein
NP_002459.3:p.(Leu252Pro)
gnomAD AF
2.6021337496747333e-05 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PM2 supporting: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 2.60213e-05, below 0.0001.
2
PP3 supporting: REVEL is 0.735, above the adjudicated threshold of 0.644.
3
VUS: two supporting criteria do not satisfy a generic ACMG/AMP 2015 classification combination rule.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, PM2 supporting plus PP3 supporting does not satisfy any pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, or likely benign rule, resulting in VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: reviewed reports describe MYD88 p.Leu265Pro, not a previously established pathogenic change at residue 252 with the same amino-acid substitution. |
PMID:21179087
PMID:22931316
PMID:23215570
PMID:23355535
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented proband phenotype, family-history status, or confirmed maternity and paternity were available for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: reviewed functional studies concern MYD88 p.Leu265Pro, whereas this variant is p.Leu252Pro, with no variant-specific validated assay evidence available. |
PMID:21179087
PMID:22931316
PMID:23355535
PMID:23836557
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no exact-variant affected-versus-control counts, odds ratio, relative risk, or 95% confidence interval were reported for MYD88 p.Leu252Pro. |
PMID:22918138
PMID:22931316
PMID:23215570
PMID:23355535
PMID:35101336
|
| PM1 | Not met | Not met: MYD88 L252P lacks evidence of a residue-specific hotspot or critical domain location without benign variation; the documented hotspot is L265P. |
PMID:21179087
PMID:23215570
PMID:23355535
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 2.60213e-05, below the PM2 supporting threshold of 0.0001. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: No parent/offspring phase data or documented recessive disorder with a trans pathogenic allele are available for MYD88 c.755T>C. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no previously pathogenic alternate missense change at MYD88 residue 252 was established, while the reported comparator p.Leu265Pro is at residue 265. |
PMID:21179087
PMID:22931316
PMID:23215570
PMID:23355535
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented proband phenotype, family-history status, or assumed de novo event without parental confirmation was available. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives or informative variant-positive and variant-negative family meioses were documented for co-segregation. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: evidence does not establish both low benign missense variation and a common missense disease mechanism for MYD88 under this criterion. |
gnomad_v4
|
| PP3 | Met | Met at supporting strength: missense REVEL score 0.735 exceeds the generic PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the case contains no patient phenotype or family-history information establishing a highly specific single-gene disease presentation. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel classification; pathogenic entries are non-expert submissions without assertion criteria. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 2.60213e-05, far below the 0.05 BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: maximum observed gnomAD v4.1 ancestry AF is 0.000101351, below the generic 0.01 BS1 default. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS2 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes among 1,614,060 alleles, with no separate healthy-adult observation. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no well-established benign assay tests MYD88 p.Leu252Pro; available studies evaluate the distinct p.Leu265Pro substitution and report activating effects. |
PMID:21179087
PMID:22931316
PMID:23355535
PMID:23836557
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives with documented variant-negative results were available to evaluate lack of segregation. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: MYD88 loss-of-function literature is present, but the evidence does not show that disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: No cis or trans observation with a pathogenic variant is documented for MYD88 c.755T>C in an informative affected individual or family. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: missense REVEL score 0.735 is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no case-specific alternate molecular basis for disease was documented alongside MYD88 p.Leu252Pro. |
PMID:22931316
PMID:23215570
PMID:23355535
clinvar
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely-benign classification for MYD88 p.Leu252Pro. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.