LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002072.5:c.626A>C
GNAQ
· NP_002063.2:p.(Gln209Pro)
· NM_002072.5
GRCh37: chr9:80409488 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr9:77794572 T>G
Gene:
GNAQ
Transcript:
NM_002072.5
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 supporting
PM1 moderate
PM2 supporting
PP3 strong
Variant details
Gene
GNAQ
Transcript
NM_002072.5
Protein
NP_002063.2:p.(Gln209Pro)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Tier I - Strong
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 supporting: Q209P showed diminished GTPase activity and oncogenic downstream signaling.
2
PM1 moderate: codon 209 is a recurrent statistically significant GNAQ hotspot.
3
PM2 supporting: the variant is absent from all reported gnomAD datasets.
4
PP3 strong: REVEL 0.956 exceeds the 0.932 strong threshold.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, one strong, one moderate, and two supporting pathogenic criteria support a Likely Pathogenic call.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no prior established pathogenic variant with the same GNAQ p.Gln209Pro amino-acid change was documented. |
clinvar
PMID:35804836
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no qualifying case-specific de novo report confirms both maternity and paternity or documents absence of family history. |
|
| PS3 | Met | Met at supporting strength: purified Q209P showed diminished GTPase activity, and cell assays showed downstream signaling comparable to oncogenic Q209L. |
PMID:30352874
PMID:35804836
|
| PS4 | Not met | Not met: available studies report affected tumor cohorts, not unaffected or population controls, so no valid PS4 odds ratio or confidence interval exceeds 5.0 with its interval excluding 1.0. |
PMID:29891723
PMID:21487925
|
| PM1 | Met | Met, moderate: GNAQ codon 209 is a statistically significant recurrent hotspot, with mutations reported exclusively at this codon in the cited cohort. |
hotspots
PMID:19078957
PMID:35804836
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: the variant was absent from every reported gnomAD dataset, corresponding to AF 0 versus the PM2 threshold of <=0.0001. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no pathogenic partner variant or parental/offspring testing establishes that GNAQ p.Gln209Pro is in trans in an affected proband. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: GNAQ p.Gln209Leu is a same-residue comparator, but its pathogenic status is not established by the available evidence. |
PMID:19078957
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no case-specific report establishes an assumed de novo occurrence of this variant in an affected patient. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives, genotyped family members, or informative cosegregation data are reported. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: GNAQ has a documented missense mechanism, but its low rate of benign missense variation is not established. |
PMID:19078957
PMID:35804836
|
| PP3 | Met | Met, strong: REVEL 0.956 exceeds the generic PP3 strong threshold of 0.932 for missense variants. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the patient's phenotype, family history, and a single-genetic-etiology diagnosis are not provided for evaluating PP4. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has zero expert-panel submissions and only a single-submitter somatic oncology record, not an exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification. |
clinvar
PMID:21487925
PMID:29891723
oncokb
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the variant was absent from all reported gnomAD datasets, so no grpmax FAF reaches the BA1 threshold of >=0.05. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: all reported gnomAD datasets were absent, providing no grpmax FAF at or above the generic BS1 default of 0.01. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented healthy adult germline carrier and no established full-penetrance early-onset disorder context are available. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no well-established assay in the reviewed evidence demonstrated that GNAQ p.Gln209Pro has no damaging effect. |
PMID:30352874
PMID:35804836
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives with negative variant testing are reported to demonstrate lack of segregation. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: available evidence favors recurrent activating missense disease biology, but a comprehensive truncating-versus-missense disease spectrum is unavailable. |
PMID:19078957
PMID:35804836
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no phase-tested affected proband shows GNAQ p.Gln209Pro with a pathogenic variant in cis or in trans. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.956 is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29 for missense variants. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no case-level evidence shows this exact variant alongside an alternate molecular basis that explains the patient's disease. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: no exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification is present, and the sole submitter is a somatic oncology laboratory. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.