LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-11-01
Case ID: NM_004333.6_c.1781A_G_20261101_052331
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_004333.6:c.1781A>G

BRAF  · NP_004324.2:p.(Asp594Gly)  · NM_004333.6
GRCh37: chr7:140453154 T>C  ·  GRCh38: chr7:140753354 T>C
Gene: BRAF Transcript: NM_004333.6
Final call
VUS
PS3 supporting PM1 moderate PM2 supporting PP3 supporting
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_004333.6
Protein
NP_004324.2:p.(Asp594Gly)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 Supporting: variant-specific studies show impaired or absent BRAF kinase activity and abnormal signaling.
2
PM1 Moderate: p.Asp594Gly lies within the VCEP-defined CR3 activation segment at amino acids 594-627.
3
PM2 Supporting: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.
4
PP3 Supporting: REVEL 0.989 exceeds the VCEP missense threshold of 0.7.
Final determination: Under the BRAF VCEP Version 2.3 framework, no pathogenic or benign combination rule is met by one moderate and three supporting criteria, so the variant is classified as VUS.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly marks PVS1 not applicable, and c.1781A>G produces the missense change p.(Asp594Gly).
cspec pvs1_variant_assessment
PS1 Not assessed Not assessed: D594G is reported, but no eligible previously established pathogenic comparator is documented in the reviewed VCEP-governed evidence.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025 PMID:26498038 PMID:28783719 PMID:23352452
PS2 Not assessed Not assessed: no documented germline proband result, confirmed maternity and paternity, parental testing, or disease phenotype is available for the de novo requirement.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025
PS3 Met Met, Supporting: two variant-specific studies show impaired or absent BRAF kinase activity with abnormal RAS-dependent ERK signaling, but the VCEP table does not list this variant.
cspec vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies PMID:28783719 PMID:23352452
PS4 Not assessed Not assessed: available reports are somatic cancer observations without RASopathy phenotype points or case-control counts needed to evaluate the VCEP's ≥1-point PS4 rule.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025 PMID:23352452 PMID:26498038
PM1 Met Met, moderate: residue 594 is the lower boundary of the VCEP-approved CR3 activation segment spanning amino acids 594-627.
cspec vcep_raf_alignment PMID:26498038
PM2 Met Met at Supporting: the variant is absent from both available all-comers gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 control records.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
PM3 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly designates PM3 as not applicable for this autosomal-dominant RASopathy framework.
cspec
PM4 N/A Not applicable: p.(Asp594Gly) is a missense substitution with no insertion, deletion, stop-loss event, or protein-length change.
cspec pvs1_variant_assessment
PM5 Not assessed Not assessed: alternate codon-594 substitutions are reported, but their VCEP likely-pathogenic status and required proband evidence are unavailable.
cspec pm5_candidates PMID:20141835 PMID:26498038
PM6 Not assessed Not assessed: no germline proband observation or parent-negative testing is documented to support an assumed de novo event.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025
PP1 Not assessed Not assessed: zero informative meioses or affected-relative genotype and phenotype data are documented for the required co-segregation evaluation.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025
PP2 Not assessed Not assessed: the required BRAF missense z score is unavailable, so comparison with the VCEP threshold of >3.09 cannot be made.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
PP3 Met Met: REVEL 0.989 meets the VCEP PP3 threshold of ≥0.7 for missense variants.
cspec revel
PP4 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly excludes PP4 and directs phenotype evidence to PS4.
cspec
PP5 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP states PP5 is not for use in this VCEP.
cspec
BA1 Not met Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than having the VCEP's ≥0.05% filtering allele frequency threshold.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
BS1 Not met Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than having the VCEP's ≥0.025% filtering allele frequency threshold.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
BS2 Not assessed Not assessed: no qualifying healthy individual or genotype-and-phenotype evidence is available to assign the VCEP's BS2 points.
cspec
BS3 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP v2.3 explicitly marks BS3 as not applicable for this framework.
cspec vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
BS4 Not assessed Not assessed: no informative meiosis or affected-family-member genotype and phenotype comparison is documented for non-segregation.
cspec PMID:14612909 PMID:14688025
BP1 N/A Not applicable: p.Asp594Gly is missense, whereas the VCEP BP1 rule is restricted to specified truncating variant types.
cspec
BP2 Not assessed Not assessed: a tumor report shows BRAF D594G with KRAS A59E, but neither germline cis/trans phase nor a RASopathy phenotype is documented to establish the ≥ (-1) Point BP2 threshold.
cspec PMID:26498038
BP3 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly marks BP3 not applicable, and c.1781A>G is a missense substitution.
cspec pvs1_variant_assessment
BP4 Not met Not met: REVEL 0.989 exceeds the VCEP BP4 threshold of ≤0.3 for missense variants.
cspec revel
BP5 Not assessed Not assessed: one somatic KRAS co-occurrence does not establish the VCEP's required alternative RASopathy cause or BP5 point value.
cspec PMID:26498038
BP6 N/A Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP states BP6 is not for use in this VCEP.
cspec
BP7 N/A Not applicable: the variant is exonic missense, whereas BP7 covers synonymous, qualifying intronic, or non-coding variants.
cspec
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.