LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006908.5:c.85C>T
RAC1
· NP_008839.2:p.(Pro29Ser)
· NM_006908.5
GRCh37: chr7:6426892 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr7:6387261 C>T
Gene:
RAC1
Transcript:
NM_006908.5
Final call
VUS
PS3 strong
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
RAC1
Transcript
NM_006908.5
Protein
NP_008839.2:p.(Pro29Ser)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 strong: variant-specific biochemical, cellular, and in vivo studies show RAC1 p.Pro29Ser activation and oncogenic effects.
2
PM2 supporting: RAC1 c.85C>T is absent from the reported gnomAD datasets.
Final determination:
Under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules, one strong criterion plus one supporting criterion does not meet a pathogenic or likely pathogenic combination, and no benign rule is satisfied, resulting in VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not met | Not met: RAC1 p.Pro29Ser is recurrently oncogenic in somatic melanoma, but no previously established pathogenic germline variant is documented. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:23284172
PMID:25056119
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | Not met: no de novo germline occurrence with confirmed parentage exists, and RAC1 P29S was somatic in every matched tumour-normal sample and absent from 2,577 germline exomes. |
clinvar
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
|
| PS3 | Met | Met, strong: independent biochemical, cellular, and in vivo assays consistently show RAC1 p.Pro29Ser activation, including significantly increased GDP-to-GTP exchange and enhanced tumor growth or drug resistance. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:23284172
PMID:25056119
PMID:25465943
|
| PS4 | Not met | Not met: melanoma cohorts report RAC1 P29S in 7/147 tumors and 20/217 sun-exposed tumors, but these somatic frequencies do not establish germline PS4 case-control enrichment. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
PMID:25465943
|
| PM1 | Not met | Not met: P29 lies in RAC1 switch I, but generic PM1 lacks established no-benign-variation evidence and the somatic hotspot route is unavailable without a VCEP rule. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
hotspots
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent from all reported gnomAD datasets, giving observed frequency 0 versus the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-proband observation or parent/offspring phase testing establishes this variant in trans with a pathogenic allele. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not met | Not met: no different missense change at RAC1 Pro29 is documented as pathogenic in the supplied ClinVar or literature evidence. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
PMID:22842228
PMID:23284172
PMID:25056119
|
| PM6 | Not met | Not met: no assumed de novo occurrence is reported, and the variant has never been detected in germline, including across more than 2,500 germline exomes. |
clinvar
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no pedigree or affected relatives were ascertained, so co-segregation in multiple affected family members cannot be examined. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: target-variant absence is available, but no gene-level benign-missense rate and missense-disease-mechanism evidence are supplied. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PP3 | Not met | Not met: missense REVEL 0.585 is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not met | Not met: no patient phenotype or family history is supplied that is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
PMID:25465943
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification, and OncoKB's somatic Oncogenic label is not sufficient for PP5. |
clinvar
oncokb
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, so its filtering allele frequency is below the >=0.05 BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with no filtering allele frequency reaching the generic >=0.01 BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no healthy-adult carrier, homozygote, or hemizygote observation is documented for this variant. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | Not met: no well-established benign functional or splicing result was identified, while multiple controlled assays consistently showed RAC1 p.Pro29Ser activation and oncogenic effects. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:23284172
PMID:25056119
PMID:25465943
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no family with affected members was ascertained, so lack of segregation among affected relatives cannot be demonstrated. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no gene-level disease spectrum shows that RAC1-related disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no clinical phase data show this variant in trans or cis with a pathogenic variant under the BP2 definition. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: missense REVEL 0.585 is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not met | Not met: the evidence documents somatic melanoma observations but no clinical case showing this variant alongside an alternate molecular basis for the evaluated disease. |
PMID:22842228
PMID:25056119
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification, and no qualifying independent benign assertion is present. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.