LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_005228.5:c.2303G>T
EGFR
· NP_005219.2:p.(Ser768Ile)
· NM_005228.5
GRCh37: chr7:55249005 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr7:55181312 G>T
Gene:
EGFR
Transcript:
NM_005228.5
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS1 strong
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
EGFR
Transcript
NM_005228.5
Protein
NP_005219.2:p.(Ser768Ile)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
Likely Pathogenic: PS1 strong is met for the previously reported EGFR p.Ser768Ile change.
2
Likely Pathogenic: PM2 supporting is met because the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.
3
Likely Pathogenic: PP3 supporting is met because REVEL is 0.765, above the 0.644 threshold.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, 1 Strong pathogenic criterion plus 2 Supporting pathogenic criteria satisfies the Likely Pathogenic combination rule.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Met | Met: the exact EGFR p.Ser768Ile change was previously reported and ClinVar variation 45251 classifies it Pathogenic, with SpliceAI max delta 0.022. |
clinvar
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
spliceai
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented proband-specific de novo result with both maternity and paternity confirmed and no family history. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: tumor and treatment-response observations do not establish a validated, reproducible, robust assay for exact EGFR S768I functional damage. |
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: S768I occurred in 2/101 tumors, but no control frequency was reported, so a valid OR and 95% CI could not be calculated. |
PMID:15623594
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: residue 768 lies in EGFR's kinase domain, but no supplied evidence establishes absence of benign variation across that domain. |
PMID:15623594
hotspots
cosmic
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, meeting the PM2 frequency threshold of <=0.0001. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | Not applicable: the evidence is from somatic EGFR tumors, with no recessive disorder or pathogenic variant demonstrated in trans. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no verified different pathogenic missense substitution at EGFR Ser768 is supplied for comparison with p.Ser768I. |
pm5_candidates
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented assumed de novo variant in a proband lacking confirmed maternity or paternity. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives or informative meioses with documented variant co-segregation are available. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the record lacks the gene-level benign missense rate and systematic evidence required for both PP2 conditions. |
oncokb
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| PP3 | Met | Met at supporting: REVEL 0.765 meets the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >=0.644 for this missense variant. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not met | Not met: The reported phenotype is NSCLC, a heterogeneous cancer diagnosis rather than a phenotype highly specific to one genetic etiology. |
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel pathogenic classification; the available Pathogenic record is a single-submitter assertion. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with no filtering allele frequency reaching the BA1 threshold of >=0.05. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: no gnomAD filtering allele frequency is available because the variant is absent, so it cannot exceed the BS1 default of >=0.01. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented healthy adult carrier or genotype-defined cohort is available to evaluate the BS2 observation requirement. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no well-established controlled assay shows that exact EGFR S768I has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives with documented absence of the variant or family non-segregation analysis are available. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | Not met: available EGFR evidence centers on recurrent kinase-domain missense gain-of-function variants, not a disease mechanism primarily caused by truncating variants. |
oncokb
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: compound EGFR mutations were reported, but cis/trans phase and pathogenicity of the accompanying variant were not established. |
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.765 exceeds the generic BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29 for this missense variant. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: The reports show additional EGFR alterations in some tumors but do not establish an alternate molecular basis for disease in the same case. |
PMID:15623594
PMID:23242437
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely-benign classification. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.